论刑事古典学派内部死刑观的异同及其借鉴意义

吉首大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 116-121.

论刑事古典学派内部死刑观的异同及其借鉴意义

(湖南公安高等专科学校，湖南长沙 410006)

出版日期:2005-10-15 发布日期:2012-08-05
作者简介:郭子贤（1968-），男，湖南永兴人，湖南公安高等专科学校副教授，主要从事犯罪心理、犯罪学研究。

On the Different Views and Their Significance of Death Penaty among the Classical Criminal Schools

(Hunan Public Security College,Changsha,Hunan 410006,China)

Online:2005-10-15 Published:2012-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：刑事古典学派内部对死刑的态度，可分为两派：保存论和废除论。贝卡利亚、边沁基于社会契约论和功利论，认为死刑存在许多弊端和坏的特性，极力主张废除死刑。费尔巴哈、康德、黑格尔等人，基于心理强制论、等量报应论和等价报应论，认为死刑有其特有的有益性或功效，主张死刑存在是合理的。但其具体观点又有差异。

关键词： 刑事古典学派, 死刑观, 保存论, 废除论, 借鉴意义

Abstract: Two opinions exist in the classical criminal schools in their attitude toward death penalty:to keep it and to rid it.Beccaria and Benthan,in the perspective of social charter and function,regarded that death penalty should be eliminated due to its malpractice,while Feuerbach,Kant and Hegel thought that based on the theories of psychological force,equal-amount punishment and equal-cost punishment,death penalty should be kept.Difference can be seen in their ideas in detail.

Key words: classical criminal schools, view of death penalty, keep, rid, significance

郭子贤. 论刑事古典学派内部死刑观的异同及其借鉴意义[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2005, 26(4): 116-121.

GUO Zi-Xian. On the Different Views and Their Significance of Death Penaty among the Classical Criminal Schools[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, 2005, 26(4): 116-121.