| 激进的诠释策略:引用、延异、异轨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 葛体标.激进的诠释策略:引用、延异、异轨[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2020,33(1):13-18. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 葛体标 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (宁波大学 人文与传媒学院,浙江 宁波 315211) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本雅明、德里达和德波建构了一种激进的诠释学，它打破文本的原意，寻求创造性解释的空间。本雅明的策略是“引用”，德里达的策略是“延异”，而德波的策略是“异轨”。这种激进诠释提供了新的文本意义，但同时也落入责任和虚无之间抉择的伦理困境。
|
| 关 键 词： | 激进诠释 引用 延异 异轨 |
GE Ti-biao |
| |
| GE Ti-biao.GE Ti-biao[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition),2020,33(1):13-18. |
| |
| Authors: | GE Ti-biao |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Faculty of Humanities and Media, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Benjamin, Derrida and Debord constructed a radical hermeneutics, which breaks the original meaning of the text and seeks new space for creative interpretation. Benjamin’s strategy is “quote” while Derrida’s and Debord’s strategies are “différance”, and “détournement”. This radical hermeneutics provides us a new meaning of the text, but it also gets itself into the ethical predicament of choosing between responsibility and meaninglessness. |
| |
| Keywords: | radical hermeneutics quote difference détournement |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》下载全文 |
