| 污染环境罪入罪标准及其认定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵睿英.污染环境罪入罪标准及其认定[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(5):169-179. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵睿英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京理工大学 法学院，北京 100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金重大项目“污染环境犯罪多元治理机制研究”（19ZDA161） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2016年两高污染环境罪司法解释的出台，为一直存在争议的污染环境罪的入罪标准提供指导。然而司法解释在实践中却引发新的适用争议，其缘由既有司法解释准立法化的原因，也有立法规范不明确的原因。为实现污染环境罪的正确适用，应结合《刑法修正案（十一）》重新理解环境立法与司法解释之关系，确定环境法益具体危险的入罪标准，并在司法认定中正确把握入罪中的具体危险和因果关系等要素，同时也应在制度上减少“规定” “解释”等准立法形式的司法解释，引入污染环境案例指导制度和相关专家制度，真正实现污染环境罪的正确适用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 污染环境罪 司法解释 入罪标准 环境法益 具体危险犯 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-11-24 |
Research on Standard of Environmental Pollution Crime |
| |
| Affiliation: | School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The judicial interpretation of environmental pollution crime issued in 2016 provides guidance for the trial of environmental pollution crime. However, the judicial interpretation has caused new application disputes. The reasons are as follows: judicial interpretation exceeds the authority; the current legislative norms are not perfect. In order to apply the crime of environmental pollution correctly, we should understand the relationship between environmental legislation and judicial interpretation in combination with N0 11 Criminal Law Amendment, determine the standard of incriminating the specific danger of environmental legal interest, correctly grasp the specific danger and causality in judicial determination, and reduce judicial interpretation in the form of “provision” and “interpretation”. The introduction of environmental pollution case guidance system and related expert system can truly achieve the correct application of environmental pollution crime. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
