| 量刑建议的文本解读及规范适用研究——基于91份规范性文件的分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王瑞君,翟宇航.量刑建议的文本解读及规范适用研究——基于91份规范性文件的分析[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):167-176. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王瑞君 翟宇航 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学(威海) 法学院, 威海 264209 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 山东省社会科学规划研究重点项目"认罪认罚从宽司法改革疑难问题研究";国家社科基金青年项目"社会矛盾预防与化解中的第三方介入机制研究" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 量刑建议是检察机关求刑权的一种表达形式。量刑建议可以区分为认罪认罚案件中的量刑建议和不认罪认罚案件中的量刑建议。“认罪认罚从宽制度”和“量刑规范化司法改革”是量刑建议价值与定位实现“质的飞跃”的关键因素。自从《刑事诉讼法》确立了认罪认罚从宽制度之后，在适用认罪认罚从宽程序的案件中，量刑建议呈现出提出义务化、内容精准化以及法院应当采纳原则化等特征。由检察机关提出量刑建议并实现精准化，是对检察官的检察业务能力和刑罚裁量理论功底的考验。量刑建议的规范适用，首先在宏观价值层面上需要检察机关从刑罚裁量的基本原理出发，贯彻认罪认罚从宽司法改革的理念内涵，厘清量刑建议在认罪认罚案件与非认罪认罚案件中的不同价值定位；其次在顶层设计层面上需要对现行涉及量刑建议的规范性法律文件进行体系性的补充与完善，为量刑建议的提出提供行之有效的宏观指导；最后在司法实践层面上，需要检察机关与其他刑事诉讼主体进行充分地沟通与协商，发挥人工智能司法系统的辅助作用，完善认罪认罚从宽量刑建议的配套机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 量刑建议 规范化 量刑规范化 认罪认罚从宽制度 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-12-08 |
On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples |
| |
| WANG Rui-jun,ZHAI Yu-hang.On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition),2021,37(2):167-176. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Rui-jun ZHAI Yu-hang |
| |
| Affiliation: | Law School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The sentencing suggestion is an expression form of the procuratorial organ's right to ask for punishment. The sentencing suggestions can be divided into the sentencing suggestions in the case of pleading guilty and the sentencing suggestions in the case of not pleading guilty. “Lenient system of confession and punishment” and “judicial reform of standardized sentencing” are the key factors to realize the “qualitative leap” in the value and orientation of sentencing suggestions. Since the criminal procedure law has established the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment, in the cases of applying the leniency procedure of pleading guilty and punishment, the sentencing suggestions show the characteristics of the compulsory proposal, accurate content and the principle that the court should adopt. It is a test of the procuratorial professional ability and the theoretical foundation of penalty discretion for prosecutors to put forward sentencing suggestions and achieve accuracy. The standard application of sentencing recommendations, first of all, from the perspective of macro value, the procuratorial organs need to carry out the concept of lenient judicial reform of confession and punishment from the perspective of the basic principles of penalty discretion, clarify the different value positions of sentencing suggestions in cases of confession and non-confession of punishment;Secondly, at the top-level design level, we need to further supplement and improve the current system of normative legal documents involving sentencing suggestions. Finally, on the level of judicial practice, we need the procuratorial organs to fully communicate and negotiate with other subjects of criminal proceedings, play the auxiliary role of the artificial intelligence judicial system, and improve the supporting mechanism of lenient sentencing suggestions. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
