| 相对不起诉制度的监督制约机制研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 侯登华,赵莹雪.相对不起诉制度的监督制约机制研究[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):160-166. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 侯登华 赵莹雪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 北京科技大学 文法学院, 北京 100083; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 相对不起诉，又称酌定不起诉，该制度的确立对于司法资源合理配置、社会矛盾化解、社会关系修复以及检察机关认罪认罚轻微刑事案件治理能力现代化水平提升均起到促进作用。该制度赋予了检察机关较大的自由裁量权，但对其监督制约仍然存在监督标准不易把握、监督制约不全面、监督制约机制得不到充分发挥的困境。面对该困境，应当从强化事前监督意识、事中监督制约、事后正负激励三个方面，通过对检察人员岗位廉政教育、查找廉政风险点，形成相对不起诉风险防控措施，以严明相对不起诉认定标准、严格相对不起诉办理、公开、报备、衔接、救济等程序方面，加强相对不起诉裁量权运行中的监督管理，并按照案件评查、监督巡查、能力考察“三查”方式，着力提升敢用、善用不起诉裁量权的能力，以期不断完善相对不起诉监督制约机制，构建严密的法治监督体系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 相对不起诉 认罪认罚从宽 轻微刑事案件 监督制约 办案质效 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-12-20 |
Study on the Discretionary Non-prosecution and the Perfection of Its Supervision and Restriction |
| |
| HOU Deng-hua,ZHAO Ying-xue.Study on the Discretionary Non-prosecution and the Perfection of Its Supervision and Restriction[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition),2021,37(2):160-166. |
| |
| Authors: | HOU Deng-hua ZHAO Ying-xue |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Humanities and Socail Sciences' University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;2. The People's Procuratorate of Huairou District of Beijing, Beijing 101400, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The discretionary non-prosecution has contributed to the promotion of the modernization of governance capabilities for procurators to handle the minor criminal cases of pleading guilty and accepting punishment, which is beneficial for the appropriate allocation of judicial resources. And it can defuse social conflicts and repair social relations. Nevertheless, prosecutors have been empowered with more discretion by the discretionary non-prosecution, which has bad effects on its Supervision and Restriction in all rounds. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the consciousness of supervision in advance, supervision in the middle and the motivation afterward. The risk control measures of discretionary non-prosecution must be implemented by strengthening anti-corruption education and ascertaining the risk points. Supervision and Restriction of the discretionary nonprosecution must be enhanced by setting clear standards and following the procedures strictly, such as the procedures for handling cases, and so on. It's worth noting that the evaluation of cases, supervision with checks and the ability examination can be used to improve the discretion of discretionary non-prosecution. Thus, the ultimate aim is to perfect the supervision and restriction of discretionary non-prosecution constantly. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
