| 政策工具视角下能源行业发展差异分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐葆君,陈俊宇,王崇州.政策工具视角下能源行业发展差异分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(2):21-27. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐葆君 陈俊宇 王崇州 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京理工大学 管理与经济学院 能源与环境政策研究中心 能源经济与环境管理北京重点实验室 北京电动车辆协同创新中心 北京经济社会可持续发展研究基地，北京 100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金;国家重点研发计划 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 新冠疫情时代能源格局加速演进和重塑，能源技术及其关联产业成为经济新增长点。能源行业发展离不开政策的多维度引导和支持，政策分析可作为预判能源行业发展趋势的重要指标之一。因此，从政策视角入手，建立一套客观标准化的政策文本量化体系，结合政策目标、行政措施、引导措施、金融措施、财政措施五维度测算细分能源行业的政策支持度，分析能源行业发展差异。梳理2015年第一季度至2021年第三季度出台的能源政策文件进行实证研究，历史趋势对比结果显示，能源行业整体受政策支持度在“十三五”时期维持稳定，2020年后持续走高；行业间对比结果显示，当前可再生能源行业的政策工具侧重技术与资源扶持，传统能源行业的政策工具更侧重于引导行业高效运行。
|
| 关 键 词： | 政策工具 能源行业 文本量化 政策支持度 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-01-25 |
Analysis of Development Differences of Energy Industry under the Perspective of Policy Tool |
| |
| TANG Baojun,CHEN Junyu,WANG Chongzhou.Analysis of Development Differences of Energy Industry under the Perspective of Policy Tool[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2022,24(2):21-27. |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Baojun CHEN Junyu WANG Chongzhou |
| |
| Affiliation: | Beijing Research Base for Sustainable Economic and Social Development, Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Electric Vehicles, Energy and Environmental Policy Research Center, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In the era of COVID-19 epidemic, the evolution and remolding of energy pattern were accelerated, energy technology and its related industries became the new economic growth point. The development of energy industry can’t be separated from the multi-dimensional guidance and support of policy, and policy analysis can be used as one of the important indicators to predict the development trend of energy industry. Therefore, this research starts with the policy perspective, establishes an objective standardization policy text quantification system, based on the five dimensions of policy objective, administrative measures, guidance measures, financial measures and fiscal measures. In this paper, the policy support degree of subdivided energy industry was calculated and the development differences of energy industry were analyzed. Combing the energy policy documents issued from the first quarter of 2015 to the third quarter of 2015, the comparative results of historical trends show that: the overall policy support for the energy sector has remained stable during the 13th five-year plan period and has continued to rise after 2020. The results of the inter-industry comparison show that the current policy tools for the renewable energy sector focus on technical and resource support, while traditional energy industry policy tools are more focused on guiding the efficient operations of the industry. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
|
