| 中日水污染刑事立法比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴献萍.中日水污染刑事立法比较研究[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2010,31(2):136-141. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴献萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （中南林业科技大学 政法学院，湖南 长沙 410004） |
| |
| 基金项目： | 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目，湖南省高等学校科学研究项目(09C1045)}湖南省哲学社会科学成果评审委员会立项课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 相对日本完善的水污染刑事立法，我国对水污染犯罪仅作了原则性规定，不仅缺乏独立的罪名，而且具有处罚范围狭窄，刑事处罚不力等弊端，从而影响到对水污染犯罪的刑事制裁。借鉴日本经验，我国应在以下几个方面对水污染刑事立法加以完善：设置独立的水污染罪；规定故意和过失两种犯罪形态；明确水污染刑事制裁范围，并设置水污染罪危险犯；加大水污染犯罪的处罚力度并充分发挥罚金刑的作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 相对日本完善的水污染刑事立法，我国对水污染犯罪仅作了原则性规定，不仅缺乏独立的罪名，而且具有处罚范围狭窄，刑事处罚不力等弊端，从而影响到对水污染犯罪的刑事制裁。借鉴日本经验，我国应在以下几个方面对水污染刑事立法加以完善：设置独立的水污染罪 规定故意和过失两种犯罪形态 明确水污染刑事制裁范围，并设置水污染罪危险犯 加大水污染犯罪的处罚力度并充分发挥罚金刑的作用。 |
Comparative Study On the Sino-Japanese Water Pollution Criminal Legislation |
| |
| WU Xian-ping.Comparative Study On the Sino-Japanese Water Pollution Criminal Legislation[J].Journal of Jishou University(Social Science),2010,31(2):136-141. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Xian-ping |
| |
| Affiliation: | (College of Law,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha,Hunan 410004,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Japan has constituted perfect water pollution criminal legislation.Chinese water pollution criminal legislation is only provided in principle.This legislation has many shortcomings,for example,it lacks standalone accuse and effective criminal penalty,and the punishment is in a narrow range,which makes it difficulty to implement criminal sanctions to punish the water pollution crime.Learning from Japan,we should perfect Chinese water pollution criminal legislation in the following ways:setting standalone accuse of water pollution with two forms of criminaldeliberateness and negligence;confirming punishment range;setting potential damage accuse,imposing a more severe penalty,and making use of pecuniary penalty,and so on. |
| |
| Keywords: | water pollution crime serious environmental pollution accident crime potential damage offense pecuniary penalty |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
