供应链知识共享的决策行为及影响因素研究

识别知识共享的影响因素是成功实施供应链知识共享的重点。以具有Stackelberg博弈特征的供应链为研究对象,分析了3种不同情况下供应链知识共享的决策行为,在定量分析的基础上讨论了供应链知识共享行为的影响因素。研究结果表明,供应链知识共享行为受到了知识价值、共享收益以及企业在供应链中的地位等诸多因素的影响。     

基于多Agent的敏捷供应链知识服务网络构建研究

针对敏捷供应链知识服务网络中的节点分布、异构及自治等特点,本文引入多Agent技术,建立了基于多Agent的敏捷供应链知识服务网络体系结构,并给出了其关键实现技术.     

供应链企业间的知识管理研究

随着知识经济时代的到来,知识管理成为供应链管理的核心内容。本文探讨了供应链中的知识管理的含义,分析了供应链企业间的知识共享模式,并提出了基于知识共享的供应链管理的实施策略。     

面向服务的敏捷供应链协同与集成技术研究

语义网作为下一代Web能够实现计算机自动处理功能。通过在Web服务中引入面向供应链的领域语义本体,将语义网与Web服务结合的语义Web服务技术为Web服务加入语义描述,可完成Web服务之间的语义级交互,从而实现敏捷供应链的复杂业务流程协同与动态组合,实现跨企业的应用系统集成。建立基于面向服务的敏捷供应链协同与集成系统架构,其松散耦合、跨企业、跨平台、支持异构系统的互操作且具有系统快速重构等能力,成为实现敏捷供应链的敏捷性、虚拟性和可重构性等特征的有效解决方案。     

论高校与企业的知识合作机制

高校与企业建立基于知识链的合作关系,通过互补性知识的共享与积累,从而提升整个供应链的核心能力。本文从高校与企业的知识需求与合作的价值分析出发,对高校与企业合作的影响因素及合作机制进行了探讨。     

考虑监控信号的供应链知识共享激励机制研究

基于委托代理理论,构建了供应链知识共享的基本激励模型和考虑监控信号的激励模型,研究了监控信号对增加供应链企业间知识共享激励契约合理性、降低成员企业知识共享过程道德风险的作用,分析了监控信号下激励契约设计有效性的影响因素。     

信息技术治理影响分销渠道敏捷的机理研究

如何获取供应链敏捷是信息系统和运作管理领域共同关注的热点和前沿问题。然而，当前研究主要关注供应链流程柔性或信息技术柔性对于供应链敏捷形成的作用，忽视了供应链环境中如何通过IT治理来实现供应链的分销渠道敏捷。基于IT治理和IT-商务战略匹配理论，本文构建了一个有调节的中介模型来实证研究IT治理、企业间电子商务战略匹配（知识匹配和运作匹配）和环境动荡性影响渠道敏捷的机理。通过对209家被调查企业的数据分析发现：IT治理通过知识匹配和运作匹配对渠道敏捷产生积极正向影响；环境动荡水平越高，运作匹配所发挥的中介作用越强；环境动荡性在IT治理和知识匹配之间存在负向调节作用，而在知识匹配和渠道敏捷之间存在正向调节作用。本文通过融合IT治理和IT-商务战略匹配理论，揭示了焦点企业和渠道伙伴的IT治理对渠道敏捷的作用机理，为供应链敏捷理论贡献新知。     

供应链企业间知识共享和谐性评价体系构建

为了更好地表述供应链企业间知识共享的状态,提出供应链企业间知识共享和谐性的概念,并用“和则”与“谐则”来表述和谐性.在此基础上,通过分析供应链企业间知识共享和谐性的影响因素,提出供应链企业间知识共享和谐性的评价指标体系.     

供应链知识共享的囚徒困境及经济学的解决方法研究

在理性约束下供应链知识共享是一种囚徒困境。通过构建博弈支付模型,本文分析了成员企业在知识共享过程中的决策行为,提出可通过改变供应链成员企业的偏好、使用显性合同、利用隐性合同、进行重复博弈等方法改变原有博弈结构,创造新的激励机制,在满足成员个人理性前提下实现供应链整体的理性,使知识共享走出囚徒困境,实现供应链知识共享的帕累托最优均衡。     

敏捷供应链企业间的知识交易

知识经济时代，知识成为一种重要资源．对于敏捷供应链来说为了应对目前复杂多变的市场环境，提高整体竞争力，节点间的企业必须注重知识的创新、交流与应用。本文在分析通过引入市场知识交易的方式来促进知识交流的基础上，分析了知识交易的主要障碍以及敏捷供应链企业闻进行知识交易的优势，在此基础上构建了知识交易模型。     

Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance

Based on the environment-strategy performance perspective and dynamic capabilities framework, we develop a theoretical model and hypotheses specifying how supply chain collaboration as a response to environment context factors – competitive intensity, supply uncertainty, technological turbulence and market turbulence, using a lean and agile strategy may influence firm performance. We test the model using partial least square structural equation modelling on data collected from a field survey with responses from 152 manufacturing firms representing a variety of industries. Empirical findings generally support the relationship between collaboration and firm performance using a lean and agile strategy. Also, for firms in industries that face environments characterised by high supply uncertainty and competitive intensity with, technological turbulence, the study finds evidence of a direct relationship between these environmental factors and supply chain collaboration. The findings provide an initial strategic response framework for appropriately aligning a lean and agile supply chain strategy through collaboration with environment context factors to achieve firm performance improvements.     

供应链式产业集群技术创新博弈分析

供应链式产业集群具备集群和供应链特性,这类集群的技术创新活动存在两种类型:供应链上下游企业创新活动和供应链间企业创新活动。从技术创新视角出发,将集群创新过程分成研发阶段和产出阶段,并引入技术溢出系数、研发资金、技术创新成功概率等变量,用动态博弈方法分别对供应链上下游企业及供应链间企业的技术创新进行分析,推导出企业利润均衡函数,最后得出如下结论:①供应链上下游企业不创新或同时创新的情况下,双方将共享利润;②由于存在技术溢出现象,供应链内某一企业进行创新,该企业及其上下游企业利润都将提高;③供应链内上下游企业采取合作创新的利润大于未创新和独立创新情况下的利润;④供应链核心企业间的竞争激烈,链间技术溢出程度变小,不创新的企业市场份额将降低,利润减少。     

Leveraging global sources of knowledge for business model innovation

This article explores the concept of leveraging global knowledge for business model innovation, whereby knowledge is transferred across space and firm boundaries for the reconfiguration of an incumbent firm's business model. Considering the implications of an ever-increasing fragmentation of global value chains and the associated dispersion of global knowledge sources, we propose that supply chain partners at foreign locations can provide valuable knowledge that incumbents can leverage to change their business model. Integrating insights from global supply chain, business model, and organizational learning literature, we theorize and empirically test how different organizational capabilities enable firms to acquire knowledge from foreign partners, integrate external with internal knowledge, transform knowledge through experimentation, and finally apply global knowledge in the form of business model innovation. We conclude with suggestions for future research.     

创新驱动下光伏产业供应链的竞协研究——基于政府竞争政策

将政府竞争政策与技术创新因素引入到两级多晶硅供应链博弈模型中,研究不同情形下政府竞争奖励与技术创新努力水平对于各级制造商最优利润的影响。构建关于硅片批发价与光伏系统销售量的利润博弈模型,求得了各级制造商的最优利润函数,并通过实证研究分析了竞争与协调两种情形下竞争政策与技术创新因素对于各级制造商最优与整体供应链总利润的影响。研究表明：(1)政府竞争政策有利于增加制造商的利润;(2)技术创新努力水平的升高可以较快的增加制造商的利润;(3)与竞争情形相比,协调情形下各制造商的利润及整个供应链总利润更高。     

供应商协同知识创新的定价策略研究

为了提高供应链协同知识创新的可行性,从知识创新对供应链存在和发展的重要性出发,首先研究了供应链中知识创新的涵义,指出协同知识创新是其特点,接着根据供应商参与的不同程度,构建了供应商协同知识创新的四个层次:承诺供应价格、提供信息、设计反馈和合作研发.在此基础上,指出协同知识创新的第一层次,承诺供应价格有着积极意义.然后,基于制造商和供应商一对一的供应链模型,提出供应商定价策略的经济决策的前提条件,在供应商承诺价格和不承诺供应价格两种情形下,分别构造了制造商与供应商的获利函数,并通过对获利函数的求解,得出供应商承诺供应价格的经济决策条件,即承诺供应价格时所获得的利润要大于不承诺供应价格时所获得的利润.     

敏捷供应链背景下企业合作关系对企业绩效的影响

现有理论文献认为,良好的企业合作关系能够提高企业绩效,但对于其作用效果和作用路径仍缺乏实证研究的支持.本文以重庆市的242家企业为研究样本,通过因子分析和结构方程模型研究了企业合作关系、敏捷供应链和企业绩效三者之间的关系,验证了企业合作关系对敏捷供应链效益、企业绩效水平具有显著的正向影响,而敏捷供应链效益可以很好地提高企业的绩效水平.     

Supply Chain Strategy,Product Characteristics,and Performance Impact: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturers*

Supply chain management has become one of the most popular approaches to enhance the global competitiveness of business corporations today. Firms must have clear strategic thinking in order to effectively organize such complicated activities, resources, communications, and processes. An emerging body of literature offers a framework that identifies three kinds of supply chain strategies: lean strategy, agile strategy, and lean/agile strategy based on in‐depth case studies. Extant research also suggests that supply chain strategies must be matched with product characteristics in order for firms to achieve better performance. This article investigates supply chain strategies and empirically tests the supply chain strategy model that posits lean, agile, and lean/agile approaches using data collected from 604 manufacturing firms in China. Cluster analyses of the data indicate that Chinese firms are adopting a variation of lean, agile, and lean/agile supply chain strategies identified in the western literature. However, the data reveal that some firms have a traditional strategy that does not emphasize either lean or agile principles. These firms perform worse than firms that have a strategy focused on lean, agile, or lean/agile supply chain. The strategies are examined with respect to product characteristics and financial and operational performance. The article makes significant contributions to the supply chain management literature by examining the supply chain strategies used by Chinese firms. In addition, this work empirically tests the applicability of supply chain strategy models that have not been rigorously tested empirically or in the fast‐growing Chinese economy.     

Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Supplier Innovation Generation in Customer–Supplier Relationships: The Role of Power‐Dependence

While innovations generated by supply channel relationships, as opposed to individual partners, play an increasingly important role in the success of all supply chain partners, there has been a dearth of research in the literature on how supply chain relationships cultivate the process of such innovation generation. We explore supplier market knowledge acquisition, relationship learning, systems collaboration, and technological uncertainty as antecedents of supplier innovation generation, which is in turn hypothesized to positively affect the relationship performance of the supplier. Furthermore, supplier dependence on the buyer is investigated as a moderator of the effects of such antecedents on supplier innovation generation. Empirical tests, which used a sample of 236 Taiwanese executives, supported most of the hypotheses, and some implications of the results are discussed.     

The Roles of Supply Chain Intelligence and Adaptability in New Product Launch Success

Many new product introductions continue to be unsuccessful, and while researchers have studied product development processes, relatively few studies directly address new product launch. We do so in the present research and posit that supply chain intelligence, defined as technological and competitive knowledge sourced and integrated from suppliers, customers, and competitors, plays an important role in explaining new product launch success. We further employ the knowledge‐based view to theorize that both supply chain adaptability and product innovation capability act as important mediators of the effects of supply chain intelligence on new product launch success and firm financial performance. While the former capability refers to a firm's ability to quickly adjust its supply chain to react to market and product design changes, the latter refers to the firm's proficiency in developing innovative new products. We test hypothesized relationships among these factors utilizing data collected in a survey of 229 U.S. manufacturing firms. Results point to the central role of supply chain adaptability in capturing the benefits of supplier technological intelligence for enhanced product innovation capability, new product launch success, and firm financial performance. In contrast, product innovation capability serves as the generative means by which customer and competitor intelligence is translated into more successful new product launches, which, in turn, produce superior firm financial performance. Overall, these findings contribute to a better understanding of factors that can explain why certain product launches are more successful than others, and offer practical insights for appropriate investments in the development of related knowledge resources.     

协作研发与在位企业突破性技术创新及代际知识桥的中介作用——以汽车行业为例

鉴于代际知识桥对企业突破性技术创新的作用可能不同,以65家汽车行业整车在位企业为样本,对其2009~2019年的面板数据进行负二项回归分析后发现:协作研发能够直接提升在位企业的突破性技术创新绩效,且显性代际知识桥与隐性代际知识桥在其间均可发挥积极中介作用;旧技术创新绩效对协作研发与突破性技术创新绩效的关系会产生积极作用,对显性代际知识桥与突破性技术创新绩效的关系会产生消极作用,但均不显著;旧技术创新绩效对隐性代际知识桥与突破性技术创新绩效的关系会产生显著消极作用。