A powerful and efficient algorithm for breaking the links between aliased effects in asymmetric designs

Fractional factorial (FF) designs are no doubt the most widely used designs in experimental investigations due to their efficient use of experimental runs. One price we pay for using FF designs is, clearly, our inability to obtain estimates of some important effects (main effects or second order interactions) that are separate from estimates of other effects (usually higher order interactions). When the estimate of an effect also includes the influence of one or more other effects the effects are said to be aliased. Folding over an FF design is a method for breaking the links between aliased effects in a design. The question is, how do we define the foldover structure for asymmetric FF designs, whether regular or nonregular? How do we choose the optimal foldover plan? How do we use optimal foldover plans to construct combined designs which have better capability of estimating lower order effects? The main objective of the present paper is to provide answers to these questions. Using the new results in this paper as benchmarks, we can implement a powerful and efficient algorithm for finding optimal foldover plans which can be used to break links between aliased effects.     

De-aliasing effects using semifoldover techniques

Semifoldover designs, obtained by semifolding a regular two-level factorial design, have been discussed recently in the literature. In this article, with the use of indicator functions, we investigate various semifoldover designs that are obtained from a general two-level factorial design. We discuss when a main factor or a two-factor interaction can be de-aliased from their aliased two-factor interactions, and extend some of the existing results from regular designs to non-regular designs. Finally, we present some examples to illustrate the results developed here.     

A method for screening active effects in supersaturated designs

A supersaturated design (SSD) is a design whose run size is not enough for estimating all the main effects. The goal in conducting such a design is to identify, presumably only a few, relatively dominant active effects with a cost as low as possible. However, data analysis of such designs remains primitive: traditional approaches are not appropriate in such a situation and several methods which were proposed in the literature in recent years are effective when used to analyze two-level SSDs. In this paper, we introduce a variable selection procedure, called the PLSVS method, to screen active effects in mixed-level SSDs based on the variable importance in projection which is an important concept in the partial least-squares regression. Simulation studies show that this procedure is effective.     

On the analysis of unbalanced two-level supersaturated designs via generalized linear models

Supersaturated designs (SSDs) are factorial designs in which the number of experimental runs is smaller than the number of parameters to be estimated in the model. While most of the literature on SSDs has focused on balanced designs, the construction and analysis of unbalanced designs has not been developed to a great extent. Recent studies discuss the possible advantages of relaxing the balance requirement in construction or data analysis of SSDs, and that unbalanced designs compare favorably to balanced designs for several optimality criteria and for the way in which the data are analyzed. Moreover, the effect analysis framework of unbalanced SSDs until now is restricted to the central assumption that experimental data come from a linear model. In this article, we consider unbalanced SSDs for data analysis under the assumption of generalized linear models (GLMs), revealing that unbalanced SSDs perform well despite the unbalance property. The examination of Type I and Type II error rates through an extensive simulation study indicates that the proposed method works satisfactorily.     

An optimality criterion for supersaturated designs with quantitative factors

A supersaturated design (SSD) is a factorial design in which the degrees of freedom for all its main effects exceed the total number of distinct factorial level-combinations (runs) of the design. Designs with quantitative factors, in which level permutation within one or more factors could result in different geometrical structures, are very different from designs with nominal ones which have been treated as traditional designs. In this paper, a new criterion is proposed for SSDs with quantitative factors. Comparison and analysis for this new criterion are made. It is shown that the proposed criterion has a high efficiency in discriminating geometrically nonisomorphic designs and an advantage in computation.     

Sure independence screening for analyzing supersaturated designs

ABSTRACT

Supersaturated designs (SSDs) constitute a large class of fractional factorial designs which can be used for screening out the important factors from a large set of potentially active ones. A major advantage of these designs is that they reduce the experimental cost dramatically, but their crucial disadvantage is the confounding involved in the statistical analysis. Identification of active effects in SSDs has been the subject of much recent study. In this article we present a two-stage procedure for analyzing two-level SSDs assuming a main-effect only model, without including any interaction terms. This method combines sure independence screening (SIS) with different penalty functions; such as Smoothly Clipped Absolute Deviation (SCAD), Lasso and MC penalty achieving both the down-selection and the estimation of the significant effects, simultaneously. Insights on using the proposed methodology are provided through various simulation scenarios and several comparisons with existing approaches, such as stepwise in combination with SCAD and Dantzig Selector (DS) are presented as well. Results of the numerical study and real data analysis reveal that the proposed procedure can be considered as an advantageous tool due to its extremely good performance for identifying active factors.     

A method for analyzing supersaturated designs inspired by control charts

The identification of active effects in supersaturated designs (SSDs) constitutes a problem of considerable interest to both scientists and engineers. The complicated structure of the design matrix renders the analysis of such designs a complicated issue. Although several methods have been proposed so far, a solution to the problem beyond one or two active factors seems to be inadequate. This article presents a heuristic approach for analyzing SSDs using the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) under a sure independence screening approach. Simulations are used to investigate the performance of the method comparing the proposed method with other well-known methods from the literature. The results establish the powerfulness of the proposed methodology.     

Switching-one-column follow-up experiments for Plackett-Burman designs

Industrial experiments are frequently performed sequentially using two-level fractional factorial designs. In this context, a common strategy for the design of follow-up experiments is to switch the signs in one column. It is well known that this strategy, when applied to two-level fractional factorial resolution III designs, will clear the main effect, for which the switch was performed, from any confounding with any other two-factor interactions and will also clear all the two-factor interactions between that factor and the other main effects from any confounding with other two-factor interactions. In this article, we extend this result and show that this strategy applies to any orthogonal two-level resolution III design and therefore specifically to any two-level Plackett- Burman design .     

A New Analysis Strategy for Designs With Complex Aliasing

Abstract

Nonregular designs are popular in planning industrial experiments for their run-size economy. These designs often produce partially aliased effects, where the effects of different factors cannot be completely separated from each other. In this article, we propose applying an adaptive lasso regression as an analytical tool for designs with complex aliasing. Its utility compared to traditional methods is demonstrated by analyzing real-life experimental data and simulation studies.     

Breaking alias chains in fractional factorials

Some experimenters carry out their investigation in stages. They begin with an initial 2^n-p fraction of resolution IV, in which the main effects are clean and the interactions are aliased in chains, Then, having analyzed the initial experiment, they plan further runs to isolate certain interactions by breaking the chains. In this paper a method called semifolding, for choosing the points in the second experiment, is presented.     

Testing treatment‐by‐period interaction in four‐period crossover trials

Statistical analyses of crossover clinical trials have mainly focused on assessing the treatment effect, carryover effect, and period effect. When a treatment‐by‐period interaction is plausible, it is important to test such interaction first before making inferences on differences among individual treatments. Considerably less attention has been paid to the treatment‐by‐period interaction, which has historically been aliased with the carryover effect in two‐period or three‐period designs. In this article, from the data of a newly developed four‐period crossover design, we propose a statistical method to compare the effects of two active drugs with respect to two response variables. We study estimation and hypothesis testing considering the treatment‐by‐period interaction. Constrained least squares is used to estimate the treatment effect, period effect, and treatment‐by‐period interaction. For hypothesis testing, we extend a general multivariate method for analyzing the crossover design with multiple responses. Results from simulation studies have shown that this method performs very well. We also illustrate how to apply our method to the real data problem.     

Three-level main-effects designs exploiting prior information about model uncertainty

To explore the projection efficiency of a design, Tsai, et al [2000. Projective three-level main effects designs robust to model uncertainty. Biometrika 87, 467–475] introduced the Q criterion to compare three-level main-effects designs for quantitative factors that allow the consideration of interactions in addition to main effects. In this paper, we extend their method and focus on the case in which experimenters have some prior knowledge, in advance of running the experiment, about the probabilities of effects being non-negligible. A criterion which incorporates experimenters’ prior beliefs about the importance of each effect is introduced to compare orthogonal, or nearly orthogonal, main effects designs with robustness to interactions as a secondary consideration. We show that this criterion, exploiting prior information about model uncertainty, can lead to more appropriate designs reflecting experimenters’ prior beliefs.     

Split-plot designs with mirror image pairs as sub-plots

In this article we investigate two-level split-plot designs where the sub-plots consist of only two mirror image trials. Assuming third and higher order interactions negligible, we show that these designs divide the estimated effects into two orthogonal sub-spaces, separating sub-plot main effects and sub-plot by whole-plot interactions from the rest. Further we show how to construct split-plot designs of projectivity P≥3. We also introduce a new class of split-plot designs with mirror image pairs constructed from non-geometric Plackett-Burman designs. The design properties of such designs are very appealing with effects of major interest free from full aliasing assuming that 3rd and higher order interactions are negligible.     

OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR 2 k PAIRED COMPARISON EXPERIMENTS

In this paper we establish the form of the optimal paired comparison design when there are k attributes, each with two levels, for testing for main effects, for main effects and two factor interactions and for main effects and two and three factor interactions. In all cases we assume that all pairs with the same number of attributes different appear equally often. In this setting the D and A optimal designs for main effects are the foldover pairs and those for main effects and two factor interactions have pairs in which about half the attributes are different.     

A series of single array 2m factorial search designs for even m

By means of a search design one is able to search for and estimate a small set of non‐zero elements from the set of higher order factorial interactions in addition to estimating the lower order factorial effects. One may be interested in estimating the general mean and main effects, in addition to searching for and estimating a non‐negligible effect in the set of 2‐ and 3‐factor interactions, assuming 4‐ and higher‐order interactions are all zero. Such a search design is called a ‘main effect plus one plan’ and is denoted by MEP.1. Construction of such a plan, for 2^m factorial experiments, has been considered and developed by several authors and leads to MEP.1 plans for an odd number m of factors. These designs are generally determined by two arrays, one specifying a main effect plan and the other specifying a follow‐up. In this paper we develop the construction of search designs for an even number of factors m, m≠6. The new series of MEP.1 plans is a set of single array designs with a well structured form. Such a structure allows for flexibility in arriving at an appropriate design with optimum properties for search and estimation.     

Bounds on the maximum number of clear two‐factor interactions for 2m‐p designs of resolution III and IV

The authors derive upper and lower bounds on the maximum number of clear two‐factor interactions in 2^m?p fractional factorial designs of resolution III and IV. A two‐factor interaction is said to be clear if it is not aliased with any main effect or with any other two‐factor interaction. The lower bounds are obtained by exhibiting specific designs. By comparing the bounds with the values of the maximum number of clear two‐factor interactions in cases where it is known, one concludes that the construction methods perform quite well.     

Projection estimation capacity of Hadamard designs

In a screening design, often only a few factors among a large number of potential factors are significantly important. Usually, it is not known which factors will be important ones. Thus, it is of practical interest to know if each projection of a design onto a small subset of factors is able to entertain and estimate all two-factor-interactions along with its main effects, assuming higher order interactions are negligible. In this paper, we investigate the estimation capacity of projections of Hadamard designs with run size up to 60. Possible applications of our results to robust parameter designs are also discussed.     

Model-Robust Design of Conjoint Choice Experiments

Within the context of choice experimental designs, most authors have proposed designs for the multinomial logit model under the assumption that only the main effects matter. Very little attention has been paid to designs for attribute interaction models. In this article, three types of Bayesian D-optimal designs for the multinomial logit model are studied: main-effects designs, interaction-effects designs, and composite designs. Simulation studies are used to show that in situations where a researcher is not sure whether or not attribute interaction effects are present, it is best to take into account interactions in the design stage. In particular, it is shown that a composite design constructed by including an interaction-effects model and a main-effects model in the design criterion is most robust against misspecification of the underlying model when it comes to making precise predictions.     

Analysis of a supersaturated design using Entropy Prior Complexity for binary responses via generalized linear models

A supersaturated design is a factorial design in which the number of effects to be estimated is greater than the available number of experimental runs. It is used in many experiments for screening purposes, i.e., for studying a large number of factors and then identifying the active ones. The goal with such a design is to identify just a few of the factors under consideration, that have dominant effects and to do this at minimum cost. While most of the literature on supersaturated designs has focused on the construction of designs and their optimality, the data analysis of such designs remains still at an early stage. In this paper, we incorporate the parameter model complexity into the supersaturated design analysis process, by assuming generalized linear models for a Bernoulli response, for analyzing main effects designs and discovering simultaneously the effects that are significant.     

D-optimal minimax design criterion for two-level fractional factorial designs

A D-optimal minimax design criterion is proposed to construct two-level fractional factorial designs, which can be used to estimate a linear model with main effects and some specified interactions. D-optimal minimax designs are robust against model misspecification and have small biases if the linear model contains more interaction terms. When the D-optimal minimax criterion is compared with the D-optimal design criterion, we find that the D-optimal design criterion is quite robust against model misspecification. Lower and upper bounds derived for the loss functions of optimal designs can be used to estimate the efficiencies of any design and evaluate the effectiveness of a search algorithm. Four algorithms to search for optimal designs for any run size are discussed and compared through several examples. An annealing algorithm and a sequential algorithm are particularly effective to search for optimal designs.