Robust minimum distance inference based on combined distances

The minimum disparity estimators proposed by Lindsay (1994) for discrete models form an attractive subclass of minimum distance estimators which achieve their robustness without sacrificing first order efficiency at the model. Similarly, disparity test statistics are useful robust alternatives to the likelihood ratio test for testing of hypotheses in parametric models; they are asymptotically equivalent to the likelihood ratio test statistics under the null hypothesis and contiguous alternatives. Despite their asymptotic optimality properties, the small sample performance of many of the minimum disparity estimators and disparity tests can be considerably worse compared to the maximum likelihood estimator and the likelihood ratio test respectively. In this paper we focus on the class of blended weight Hellinger distances, a general subfamily of disparities, and study the effects of combining two different distances within this class to generate the family of “combined” blended weight Hellinger distances, and identify the members of this family which generally perform well. More generally, we investigate the class of "combined and penal-ized" blended weight Hellinger distances; the penalty is based on reweighting the empty cells, following Harris and Basu (1994). It is shown that some members of the combined and penalized family have rather attractive properties     

Improvements in the small sample efficiency of the minimum S-divergence estimators under discrete models

This paper considers the problem of inliers and empty cells and the resulting issue of relative inefficiency in estimation under pure samples from a discrete population when the sample size is small. Many minimum divergence estimators in the S-divergence family, although possessing very strong outlier stability properties, often have very poor small sample efficiency in the presence of inliers and some are not even defined in the presence of a single empty cell; this limits the practical applicability of these estimators, in spite of their otherwise sound robustness properties and high asymptotic efficiency. Here, we study a penalized version of the S-divergences such that the resulting minimum divergence estimators are free from these issues, without altering their robustness properties and asymptotic efficiencies. We present a general proof for the asymptotic properties of these minimum penalized S-divergence estimators. This provides a significant addition to the literature, as the asymptotics of penalized divergences which are not finitely defined are currently unavailable in the literature. The small sample advantages of the minimum penalized S-divergence estimators are examined through an extensive simulation study and some empirical suggestions regarding the choice of the relevant underlying tuning parameters are also provided.     

Unbiased variance estimation in a simple exponential population using ranked set samples

The problem considered in this paper is that of unbiased estimation of the variance of an exponential distribution using a ranked set sample (RSS). We propose some unbiased estimators each of which is better than the non-parametric minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimator based on a balanced ranked set sample as well as the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator based on a simple random sample (SRS) of the same size. Relative performances of the proposed estimators and a few other properties of the estimators including their robustness under imperfect ranking have also been studied.     

Combined estimators for the correlation coefficient

Three combined estimators for the bivariate normal correlation parameter are considered. The data consist of k independent sample correlation coefficients and it is assumed that the underlying correlation parameters are all equal to ρ. Based upon the joint density function of the sample correlations a combined estimator of ρ is obtained as an approximation to the maximum likelihood solution. Two linearly combined estimators are also considered. One of them is based on Fisher's z-transformation of the sample correlations and the other on an unbiased estimator of ρ. The comparison of these three estimators indicates that the combined (approximate) MLE has a slightly smaller estimated mean squared error relative to the other two combined methods of estimation, but it does so at the expense of a relatively larger bias.     

Profile Hellinger distance estimation

The successful application of the Hellinger distance approach to fully parametric models is well known. The corresponding optimal estimators, known as minimum Hellinger distance (MHD) estimators, are efficient and have excellent robustness properties [Beran R. Minimum Hellinger distance estimators for parametric models. Ann Statist. 1977;5:445–463]. This combination of efficiency and robustness makes MHD estimators appealing in practice. However, their application to semiparametric statistical models, which have a nuisance parameter (typically of infinite dimension), has not been fully studied. In this paper, we investigate a methodology to extend the MHD approach to general semiparametric models. We introduce the profile Hellinger distance and use it to construct a minimum profile Hellinger distance estimator of the finite-dimensional parameter of interest. This approach is analogous in some sense to the profile likelihood approach. We investigate the asymptotic properties such as the asymptotic normality, efficiency, and adaptivity of the proposed estimator. We also investigate its robustness properties. We present its small-sample properties using a Monte Carlo study.     

A comparison of estimators for the proportion in the tail of a normal distribution

Three estimators of the proportion in a tail of the normal distribution are compared using the criteria of mean squared error and mean absolute error. The estimators that we compare are the maximum likelihood estimator, the minimum variance unbiased estimator, and an intuitive estimator that is frequently used in practice. The intuitive estimator is similar to the MLE but uses the usual unbiased estimator of σ² rather than the MLE of σ². We show that the intuitive estimator has low efficiency, and for this reason it is not recommended. For very smallp and for largep the MVUE has the highest efficiency. The MLE is best for moderate values ofp.     

Mixed Liu estimator in linear measurement error models

In this paper, we introduce mixed Liu estimator (MLE) for the vector of parameters in linear measurement error models by unifying the sample and the prior information. The MLE is a generalization of the mixed estimator (ME) and Liu estimator (LE). In particular, asymptotic normality properties of the estimators are discussed, and the performance of the MLE over the LE and ME are compared based on mean squared error matrix (MSEM). Finally, a Monte Carlo simulation and a numerical example are also presented for analysis.     

C335. Some numerology for the mass ratio of proton to electron,and a partially Bayesian evaluation

Recent small sample studies of estimators for the shape parameter a of the negative binomial distribution (NBD) tend to indicate that the choice of estimator can be reduced to a choice between the method of moments estimator, maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), maximum quasi-likelihood estimator and the conditional likelihood estimator (CLE). In this paper the results of a comprehensive simulation study are reported to assist with the choice from these four estimators. The study includes a traditional procedure for assessing estimators for the shape parameter of the NBD and in addition introduces an alternative assessment procedure. Based on the traditional approach the CLE is considered to perform the best overall for the range of parameter values and sample sizes considered. The alternative assessment procedure indicates that the MLE is the preferred estimator.     

Robust estimation of the mean vector for high-dimensional data set using robust clustering

The first step in statistical analysis is the parameter estimation. In multivariate analysis, one of the parameters of interest to be estimated is the mean vector. In multivariate statistical analysis, it is usually assumed that the data come from a multivariate normal distribution. In this situation, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), that is, the sample mean vector, is the best estimator. However, when outliers exist in the data, the use of sample mean vector will result in poor estimation. So, other estimators which are robust to the existence of outliers should be used. The most popular robust multivariate estimator for estimating the mean vector is S-estimator with desirable properties. However, computing this estimator requires the use of a robust estimate of mean vector as a starting point. Usually minimum volume ellipsoid (MVE) is used as a starting point in computing S-estimator. For high-dimensional data computing, the MVE takes too much time. In some cases, this time is so large that the existing computers cannot perform the computation. In addition to the computation time, for high-dimensional data set the MVE method is not precise. In this paper, a robust starting point for S-estimator based on robust clustering is proposed which could be used for estimating the mean vector of the high-dimensional data. The performance of the proposed estimator in the presence of outliers is studied and the results indicate that the proposed estimator performs precisely and much better than some of the existing robust estimators for high-dimensional data.     

Reliability estimation for the exponential distribution

This paper is concerned with classical statistical estimation of the reliability function for the exponential density with unknown mean failure time θ, and with a known and fixed mission time τ. The minimum variance unbiased (MVU) estimator and the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator are reviewed and their mean square errors compared for different sample sizes. These comparisons serve also to extend previous work, and reinforce further the nonexistence of a uniformly best estimator. A class of shrunken estimators is then defined, and it produces a shrunken quasi-estimator and a shrunken estimator. The mean square errors for both these estimators are compared to the mean square errors of the MVU and ML estimators, and the new estimators are found to perform very well. Unfortunately, these estimators are difficult to compute for practical applications. A second class of estimators, which is easy to compute is also developed. Its mean square error properties are compared to the other estimators, and it outperforms all the contending estimators over the high and low reliability parameter space. Since, for all the estimators, analytical mean square error comparisons are not tractable, extensive numerical analyses are done in obtaining both the exact small sample and large sample results.     

On improved estimation of a gamma shape parameter

This paper deals with improved estimation of a gamma shape parameter from a decision-theoretic point of view. First we study the second-order properties of three estimators – (i) the maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE), (ii) a bias corrected version of the MLE, and (iii) an improved version (in terms of mean squared error) of the MLE. It is shown that all the three estimators mentioned above are second-order inadmissible. Next, we obtain superior estimators which are second order better than the above three estimators. Simulation results are provided to study the relative risk improvement of each improved estimator over the MLE.     

Estimation of common location parameter of two exponential populations based on records

Consider the problem of estimating the common location parameter of two exponential populations using record data when the scale parameters are unknown. We derive the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), the modified maximum likelihood estimator (MMLE) and the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of the common location parameter. Further, we derive a general result for inadmissibility of an equivariant estimator under the scaled-squared error loss function. Using this result, we conclude that the MLE and the UMVUE are inadmissible and better estimators are provided. A simulation study is conducted for comparing the performances of various competing estimators.     

Estimation of parameters for the truncated exponential distribution

We consider the right truncated exponential distribution where the truncation point is unknown and show that the ML equation has a unique solution over an extended parameter space. In the case of the estimation of the truncation point T we show that the asymptotic distribution of the MLE is not centered at T. A modified MLE is introduced which outperforms all other considered estimators including the minimum variance unbiased estimator. Asymptotic as well as small sample properties of different estimators are investigated and compared. The truncated exponential distribution has an increasing failure rate, ideally suited for use as a survival distribution for biological and industrial data.     

A comparison of some robust,adaptive, and partially adaptive estimators of regression models

Numerous estimation techniques for regression models have been proposed. These procedures differ in how sample information is used in the estimation procedure. The efficiency of least squares (OLS) estimators implicity assumes normally distributed residuals and is very sensitive to departures from normality, particularly to "outliers" and thick-tailed distributions. Lead absolute deviation (LAD) estimators are less sensitive to outliers and are optimal for laplace random disturbances, but not for normal errors. This paper reports monte carlo comparisons of OLS,LAD, two robust estimators discussed by huber, three partially adaptiveestimators, newey's generalized method of moments estimator, and an adaptive maximum likelihood estimator based on a normal kernal studied by manski. This paper is the first to compare the relative performance of some adaptive robust estimators (partially adaptive and adaptive procedures) with some common nonadaptive robust estimators. The partially adaptive estimators are based on three flxible parametric distributions for the errors. These include the power exponential (Box-Tiao) and generalized t distributions, as well as a distribution for the errors, which is not necessarily symmetric. The adaptive procedures are "fully iterative" rather than one step estimators. The adaptive estimators have desirable large sample properties, but these properties do not necessarily carry over to the small sample case.

The monte carlo comparisons of the alternative estimators are based on four different specifications for the error distribution: a normal, a mixture of normals (or variance-contaminated normal), a bimodal mixture of normals, and a lognormal. Five hundred samples of 50 are used. The adaptive and partially adaptive estimators perform very well relative to the other estimation procedures considered, and preliminary results suggest that in some important cases they can perform much better than OLS with 50 to 80% reductions in standard errors.

     

Estimation of risk ratio in a noncompliance randomized clinical trial with trichotomous dose levels

In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), we may come across the situation in which some patients do not fully comply with their assigned treatment. For an experimental treatment with trichotomous levels, we derive the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the risk ratio (RR) per level of dose increase in a RCT with noncompliance. We further develop three asymptotic interval estimators for the RR. To evaluate and compare the finite sample performance of these interval estimators, we employ Monte Carlo simulation. When the number of patients per treatment is large, we find that all interval estimators derived in this paper can perform well. When the number of patients is not large, we find that the interval estimator using Wald’s statistic can be liberal, while the interval estimator using the logarithmic transformation of the MLE can lose precision. We note that use of a bootstrap variance estimate in this case may alleviate these concerns. We further note that an interval estimator combining interval estimators using Wald’s statistic and the logarithmic transformation can generally perform well with respect to the coverage probability, and be generally more efficient than interval estimators using bootstrap variance estimates when RR>1. Finally, we use the data taken from a study of vitamin A supplementation to reduce mortality in preschool children to illustrate the use of these estimators.     

Hellinger distance as a penalized log likelihood

The present paper studies the minimum Hellinger distance estimator by recasting it as the maximum likelihood estimator in a data driven modification of the model density. In the process, the Hellinger distance itself is expressed as a penalized log likelihood function. The penalty is the sum of the model probabilities over the non-observed values of the sample space. A comparison of the modified model density with the original data provides insights into the robustness of the minimum Hellinger distance estimator. Adjustments of the amount of penalty leads to a class of minimum penalized Hellinger distance estimators, some members of which perform substantially better than the minimum Hellinger distance estimator at the model for small samples, without compromising the robustness properties of the latter.     

A comparison of some robust, adaptive, and partially adaptive estimators of regression models

Numerous estimation techniques for regression models have been proposed. These procedures differ in how sample information is used in the estimation procedure. The efficiency of least squares (OLS) estimators implicity assumes normally distributed residuals and is very sensitive to departures from normality, particularly to "outliers" and thick-tailed distributions. Lead absolute deviation (LAD) estimators are less sensitive to outliers and are optimal for laplace random disturbances, but not for normal errors. This paper reports monte carlo comparisons of OLS,LAD, two robust estimators discussed by huber, three partially adaptiveestimators, newey's generalized method of moments estimator, and an adaptive maximum likelihood estimator based on a normal kernal studied by manski. This paper is the first to compare the relative performance of some adaptive robust estimators (partially adaptive and adaptive procedures) with some common nonadaptive robust estimators. The partially adaptive estimators are based on three flxible parametric distributions for the errors. These include the power exponential (Box-Tiao) and generalized t distributions, as well as a distribution for the errors, which is not necessarily symmetric. The adaptive procedures are "fully iterative" rather than one step estimators. The adaptive estimators have desirable large sample properties, but these properties do not necessarily carry over to the small sample case.

The monte carlo comparisons of the alternative estimators are based on four different specifications for the error distribution: a normal, a mixture of normals (or variance-contaminated normal), a bimodal mixture of normals, and a lognormal. Five hundred samples of 50 are used. The adaptive and partially adaptive estimators perform very well relative to the other estimation procedures considered, and preliminary results suggest that in some important cases they can perform much better than OLS with 50 to 80% reductions in standard errors.     

On minimum Hellinger distance estimation

Efficiency and robustness are two fundamental concepts in parametric estimation problems. It was long thought that there was an inherent contradiction between the aims of achieving robustness and efficiency; that is, a robust estimator could not be efficient and vice versa. It is now known that the minimum Hellinger distance approached introduced by Beran [R. Beran, Annals of Statistics 1977;5:445–463] is one way of reconciling the conflicting concepts of efficiency and robustness. For parametric models, it has been shown that minimum Hellinger estimators achieve efficiency at the model density and simultaneously have excellent robustness properties. In this article, we examine the application of this approach in two semiparametric models. In particular, we consider a two‐component mixture model and a two‐sample semiparametric model. In each case, we investigate minimum Hellinger distance estimators of finite‐dimensional Euclidean parameters of particular interest and study their basic asymptotic properties. Small sample properties of the proposed estimators are examined using a Monte Carlo study. The results can be extended to semiparametric models of general form as well. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 37: 514–533; 2009 © 2009 Statistical Society of Canada     

Aalen's linear model for doubly censored data

Double censoring often occurs in registry studies when left censoring is present in addition to right censoring. In this work, we examine estimation of Aalen's nonparametric regression coefficients based on doubly censored data. We propose two estimation techniques. The first type of estimators, including ordinary least squared (OLS) estimator and weighted least squared (WLS) estimators, are obtained using martingale arguments. The second type of estimator, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), is obtained via expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms that treat the survival times of left censored observations as missing. Asymptotic properties, including the uniform consistency and weak convergence, are established for the MLE. Simulation results demonstrate that the MLE is more efficient than the OLS and WLS estimators.     

Optimal rank set sampling estimates for a population proportion

This paper examines two different classes of estimates for a population proportion based on an unbalanced rank set sample. Specifically, the two classes correspond to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and a weighted average (WA) estimate. Both estimators are asymptotically normal, so standard inference procedures can still be implemented. Furthermore, these results can be used to develop optimal allocation schemes for both estimators. The performances of the optimal estimators are studied in terms of both finite sample and asymptotic relative efficiency. In general, the MLE is more efficient than the WA estimate. Lastly, the practicality of the optimal sampling plans is addressed and illustrated via an example.