广西出台土地政策加大对养老服务业扶持力度

为积极应对人口老龄化，满足日益增长的养老服务需求，日前，广西壮族自治区人民政府出台《关于促进养老服务业加快发展的实施意见》，强调落实土地供应和土地税费优惠政策，加大对养老服务业的扶持力度。实施意见明确，将各类养老服务设施建设用地纳入城镇土地利用总体规划和年度用地计划，将闲置的公益性用地优先调整为养老服务用地；     

学习国外经验搞好土地规划

土地是财富之母,是人类社会赖以生存和发展的基础.随着我国经济建设的飞速发展和城市化进程的加快,城市建设用地与农业用地之间的矛盾日益尖锐,城市土地利用结构和布局不合理的问题也相当突出,这些都迫切要求进行科学合理的城市土地利用总体规划.城市土地利用总体规划是在一定时期内对城市范围内全部土地的综合利用所做的统筹安排和长远规划.它包括对城市建设用地与城市非建设用地的规划,当然同一级的农业区划也包括对这部分农业用地的规划.搞好城市土地利用总体规划意义重大,它能有效调节城市建设用地与农业用地之间的矛盾;有利于调整城市土地的结构和布局;也能加强城市土地供给的宏观调控,促进城市房地产业的健康发展.     

刍论工业项目建设用地控制指标管理

为认真贯彻落实＂十分珍惜、合理利用土地和切实保护耕地＂的基本国策,促进建设用地的集约节约利用和优化配置,提高工业项目建设用地的管理水平,国土资源部2004年出台《工业建设用地控制指标》,并于2008年进行修订。控制指标是对工业项目及其配套工程在土地利用上进行控制的标准。指标下发实施几年来,在合理供应建设用地,切实提高工业项目用地集约利用水平、优化土地利用结构方面发挥了重要作用,     

用科学发展观统领新一轮土地利用总体规划修编

土地利用总体规划是土地管理的龙头。新一轮土地利用总体规划修编面,临诸多问题,本文在深入调查的基础上,研究提出树立促进城乡协调发展、区域协调发展、可持续发展和促进经济增长的土地利用规划理念,用科学发展明铳领新一轮土地利用总体规划修编等观点,并提出加强区域空间结构和宏观经济分析;土地利用总体规划向空间规划和综合规划转变;加强对集约用地的评价;规划控制指标分配与集约用地挂钩;加强对规划的经济效益分析;建立不同层次的指标控制与空间控制相结合的土地利用规划指标分析方法：加强乡级土地利用规划编制;规划决策由政府决策向民主决策转变等对策措施。     

低山丘陵区基本农田保护研究——以四川省广安市为例

上一轮土地利用总体规划(1996～2010)已经实施近十年时间,我国实施西部大开发的战略举措促使了西部地区建设用地大量增加,耕地已经减少到规划指标之下.一方面说明了我国西部地区社会、经济快速发展;另一方面反映了我国西部地区建设用地和耕地的矛盾突出.在新形势下,新一轮土地利用总体规划的开展将①从空间上保护基本农田,②从质量上控制基本农田,③从类型上保证基本农田,以确保地区粮食安全.     

对建设用地置换工作的思索

在严把土地关口的形势下,基层政府普遍存在着用地指标紧缺的情况.开展建设用地置换工作是破解用地瓶颈的良策.建设用地置换足指依据土地利用总体规划,将依法取得的零星分散等不宜利用的建设用地,通过调整合并为适宜利用的建设用地或者与规划为建设用地的农用地进行调整的行为.建设用地置换工作能促进县域经济发展和社会主义新农村建设,优化土地利用结构,进一步盘活闲置、低效建设用地.但建设用地置换工作起步迟,操作起来有许多地方要完善.     

土地管理中的规划 计划及策划

土地管理工作中所涉及的规划主要是指土地利用总体规划和城市总体规划。土地利用总体规划是在一定时期和一定地域范围内,根据土地资源现状和潜力及国民经济和社会发展规划,对各类用地进行统筹安排和合理布局。城市总体规划是确定一个城市的性质、规模、发展方向以及制订城市中各类建设的总体布局的全面环境安排的城市规划。城市总体规划与土     

面向用地审查报批的地类及权属面积快速分析脚本工具设计

<正>一、引言建设项目用地预审与规划选址、用地报批是实施国土空间总体规划,落实用途管制的重要手段,对项目的用地规模等进行分析,能有效地引导建设项目合理布局,促进土地节约集约利用,优化土地利用结构,提高土地利用效率,减少耕地、永久基本农田的占用。2022年8月,     

《建设项目用地预审管理办法》

(2001年6月28日国土资源部第5次部务会议通过,2004年10月29日国土资源部第9次部务会议修订,2008年11月12日国土资源部第13次部务会议修正) 第一条为保证土地利用总体规划的实施,充分发挥土地供应的宏观调控作用,控制建设用地总量,根据<中华人民共和国土地管理法>、<中华人民共和国土地管理法实施条例>和<国务院关于深化改革严格土地管理的决定>,制定本办法.     

保增长保红线行动工作方案

一、总体要求 通过对<国土资源部关于为扩大内需促进经济平稳较快发展做好服务和监管工作的通知>(国土资发(2008)237号)等土地调控政策执行的指导和监督检查,确保土地利用规划和计划管控、建设用地审批和供应、地质技术信息服务、土地督察和执法监管政策措施全面、准确、规范实施,有效保障扩大内需项目用地,提高土地调控政策的应变能力和效果,维护土地管理秩序,坚守18亿亩耕地红线,促进经济平稳较快发展.     

Plan and control

Conclusion Is closer and closer social control the inevitable price of progress, a necessary concomitant of the continued development of modern social forms? We believe that this is indeed the case. Against those who see the new communications technologies as the basis for a coming communications era, and the new information technologies as the panacea for our present Age of Ignorance, our own argument is that their development has, in fact, been closely associated with processes of social management and control. The scale and complexity of the modern nation state has made communications and information resources (and technologies) central to the maintenance of political and administrative cohesion.The Information Revolution is, then, not simply and straight-forwardly a matter of technological progress, of a new technological or industrial revolution. It is significant, rather, for the new matrix of political and cultural forces that it supports. And a crucial dimension here is that of organizational form and structure. Communication and information resources (and technologies) set the conditions and limits to the scale and nature of organizational possibilities. What they permit is the development of complex and large-scale bureaucratic organizations, and also of extended corporate structures that transcend the apparent limits of space and time (transnational corporations). They also constitute the nervous system of the modern state and guarantee its cohesion as an expansive organizational form. Insofar as they guarantee and consolidate these essential power structures in modern society, information and communication are fundamental to political-administrative regulation, and consequently to the social and cultural experience of modernity.The exploitation of information resources and technologies has expressed itself, politically and culturally, through the dual tendency towards social planning and management, on the one hand, and surveillance and control, on the other. In historical terms, this can be seen as the apotheosis of Lewis Mumford's megamachine: technology now increasingly fulfils what previously depended upon bureaucratic organization and structure. But the central historical reference point is the emergence, early in the twentieth century, of Scientific Management (as a philosophy both of industrial production and of social reproduction). It was at this moment that scientific planning and management moved beyond the factory to regulate the whole way of life. At this time, the gathering of social knowledge became the normal accompaniment of action, and the manufacture of consent, through propaganda and opinion management, was increasingly based on analysis rather than on rule of thumb. If, through Scientific Management, the planning and administration of everyday life became pervasive, it also became the preeminent form and expression of social control. Planning and management were, necessarily and indissociably, a process of surveillance and of manipulation and persuasion. To the extent that these administrative and dominative information strategies were first developed on a systematic basis, it was at this historical moment, we believe, that the Information Revolution was unleashed. New information and communications technologies have most certainly advanced, and automated, these combined information and intelligence activities, but they remain essentially refinements of what was fundamentally a political-administrative revolution.Recent innovations in information and communications technologies have generally been discussed from a narrow technological or economic perspective. It has been a matter of technology assessment or of the exploitation of new technologies to promote industrial competitiveness and economic growth. This, in the light of our discussion, seems a partial and blinkered vision. The absolutely central question to be raised in the context of the Information Revolution of the eighties, is, we believe, the relation between knowledge/information and the system of political and corporate power. For some, knowledge is inherently and self-evidently a benevolent force, and improvements in the utilization of knowledge are demonstrably the way to ensure social progress. Information is treated as an instrumental and technical resource that will ensure the rational and efficient management of society. It is a matter of social engineering by knowledge professionals and information specialists and technocrats. For us, the problems of the information society are more substantial, complex, and oblique.This, of course, raises difficult political and philosophical issues. These are the issues that Walter Lippmann comes up against when he recognizes in the Great Society that centralization of power which deprives [citizens] of control over the use of that power, and when he confronts the disturbing awareness that the problems that vex democracy seem to be unmanageable by democratic methods. They are the issues that Lewis Mumford addresses when he argues that the tension between small-scale association and large-scale organization, between personal autonomy and institutional regulation, between remote control and diffused local intervention, has now created a critical situation. And they are the monumental issues that concern Castoriadis in his analysis of instrumental reason and the rationalist ideology, those myths which, more than money or weapons, constitute the most formidable obstacles in the way of the reconstruction of human society.Among the significant issues to be raised by the new information technologies are their relation to social forms of organization, their centrality to structures of political power, and their role in the cultural logic of consumer capitalism. Sociological analysis is naïve, we believe, when it treats the new telecommunications, space, video, and computing technologies as innocent technical conceptions and looks hopefully to a coming, post-industrial Utopia. Better to look back to the past, to the entwined histories of reason, knowledge, and technology, and to their relation to the economic development of capitalism and the political and administrative system of the modern nation state.     

A Counseling Plan for Randall

The “Case of Randall” illustrates many common issues that underlie the provision of career counseling to individuals with brain injury. Often, brain-injured individuals experience a diminished capacity to perform work-related functions, and require anywhere from 6 months to 5 years of rehabilitation before they are ready for job placement. As Kay, Ezrachi, and Cavallo (1986) have noted, the rate of return to work among brain-injured individuals is between 25% and 75%. Hence, the length of rehabilitation time required by Randall is not unusual. As is true with Randall, many individuals who have suffered brain injury have difficulty adjusting to changes in their cognitive and physical functioning. Frequently, these individuals experience anger and frustration, and have difficulty accepting and understanding their newfound limitations.