Prediction of Times to Failure of Censored Items for a Simple Step-Stress Model with Regular and Progressive Type I Censoring from the Exponential Distribution

The problem of predicting times to failure of units from the Exponential Distribution which are censored under a simple step-stress model is considered in this article. We discuss two types of censoring—regular and progressive Type I—and two kinds of predictors—the maximum likelihood predictors (MLP) and the conditional median predictors (CMP) for each type of censoring. Numerical examples are used to illustrate the prediction methods. Using simulation studies, mean squared prediction error (MSPE) and prediction intervals are generated for these examples. MLP and the CMP are then compared with respect to MSPE and the prediction interval.     

One-sided normal prediction intervals and sample sizes for a third-stage sample

One-sided two-stage prediction intervals for a normal population are extended to a third sampling stage. Procedures and tables are given for two situations. In the first situation, methods for obtaining such intervals are presented, and tables for calculating such prediction intervals are provided. In the second situation, a two-stage prediction interval has been applied, and a third stage is now required. Sample sizes are given for the third stage.     

Distribution-free prediction intervals for the future current record statistics

Prediction of records plays an important role in many applications, such as, meteorology, hydrology, industrial stress testing and athletic events. In this paper, based on the observed current records of an iid sequence sample drawn from an arbitrary unknown distribution, we develop distribution-free prediction intervals as well as prediction upper and lower bounds for current records from another iid sequence. We also present sharp upper bounds for the expected lengths of the so obtained prediction intervals. Numerical computations of the coverage probabilities are presented for choosing the appropriate limits of the prediction intervals.      

Some New Estimators for Small-Area Means With Application to the Assessment of Farmland Values

Regression models that account for main state effects and nested county effects are considered for the assessment of farmland values. Empirical predictors obtained by replacing the unknown variances in the formulas of the optimal predictors by maximum likelihood estimates are presented. The computations are carried out by simple iterations between two SAS procedures. Estimators for the prediction variances are derived, and a modification to secure the robustness of the predictors is proposed. The procedure is applied to data on nonirrigated cropland in the Corn Belt states and is shown to yield predictors with considerably lower prediction mean squared errors than the survey estimators and other regression-type estimators.     

Bayesian prediction of order statistics based on k-record values from exponential distribution

Bayesian prediction of order statistics as well as the mean of a future sample based on observed record values from an exponential distribution are discussed. Several Bayesian prediction intervals and point predictors are derived. Finally, some numerical computations are presented for illustrating all the proposed inferential procedures.     

Prediction intervals for ordinary and dual generalized order statistics from two independent sequences

ABSTRACT

Based on the observed dual generalized order statistics drawn from an arbitrary unknown distribution, nonparametric two-sided prediction intervals as well as prediction upper and lower bounds for an ordinary and a dual generalized order statistic from another iid sequence with the same distribution are developed. The prediction intervals for dual generalized order statistics based on the observed ordinary generalized order statistics are also developed. The coverage probabilities of these prediction intervals are exact and free of the parent distribution, F. Finally, numerical computations and real examples of the coverage probabilities are presented for choosing the appropriate limits of the prediction.     

Estimation Bias in the First-Order Autoregressive Model and Its Impact on Predictions and Prediction Intervals

The least squares estimate of the autoregressive coefficient in the AR(1) model is known to be biased towards zero, especially for parameters close to the stationarity boundary. Several methods for correcting the autoregressive parameter estimate for the bias have been suggested. Using simulations, we study the bias and the mean square error of the least squares estimate and the bias-corrections proposed by Kendall and Quenouille.

We also study the mean square forecast error and the coverage of the 95% prediction interval when using the biased least squares estimate or one of its bias-corrected versions. We find that the estimation bias matters little for point forecasts, but that it affects the coverage of the prediction intervals. Prediction intervals for forecasts more than one step ahead, when calculated with the biased least squares estimate, are too narrow.     

Prediction for future failures in Weibull distribution under hybrid censoring

In this paper, we consider the prediction of a future observation based on a type-I hybrid censored sample when the lifetime distribution of experimental units is assumed to be a Weibull random variable. Different classical and Bayesian point predictors are obtained. Bayesian predictors are obtained using squared error and linear-exponential loss functions. We also provide a simulation consistent method for computing Bayesian prediction intervals. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to compare the performances of the different methods, and one data analysis has been presented for illustrative purposes.     

Estimation procedures and prediction intervals

The starship, as an alternative or companion procedure to the bootstrap, introduced by Owen (1988), and the well known maximum likelihood estimation procedure were used to find prediction intervals for the future sample mean of an exponential distribution. Some remarks based on a simulation study are made on the differences between the two procedures.     

Simultaneous prediction intervals for regression models with an intercept

Consider the usual linear regression model y = x’β+?, relating a response y to a vector of predictors x. Suppose that n observations on y together with the corresponding values of x are available , and it is desired to construct simultaneous prediction intervals for k future values of y at values of x which can not be ascertained beforehand. In most applications the regression model contains an intercept. This paper presents two sets of prediction intervals appropriate to this case. The proposed intervals are compared with those of Carlstein (1986), and the improvements are illustrated in the case of simple linear regression.     

Prediction intervals for farima processes by bootstrap methods

In this paper we introduce a procedure to compute prediction intervals for FARIMA (p d q) processes, taking into account the variability due to model identification and parameter estimation. To this aim, a particular bootstrap technique is developed. The performance of the prediction intervals is then assessed and compared to that of stand­ard bootstrap percentile intervals. The methods are applied to the time series of Nile River annual minima.     

Prediction intervals with a Dirichlet-process prior distribution

Let X₁, …,X_n, and Y₁, … Y_n be consecutive samples from a distribution function F which itself is randomly chosen according to the Ferguson (1973) Dirichlet-process prior distribution on the space of distribution functions. Typically, prediction intervals employ the observations X₁,…, X_n in the first sample in order to predict a specified function of the future sample Y₁, …, Y_n. Here one- and two-sided prediction intervals for at least q of N future observations are developed for the situation in which, in addition to the previous sample, there is prior information available. The information is specified via the parameter α of the Dirichlet process prior distribution.     

Prediction Techniques for Box–Cox Regression Models

This article reviews several techniques useful for forming point and interval predictions in regression models with Box-Cox transformed variables. The techniques reviewed—plug-in, mean squared error analysis, predictive likelihood, and stochastic simulation—take account of nonnormality and parameter uncertainty in varying degrees. A Monte Carlo study examining their small-sample accuracy indicates that uncertainty about the Box–Cox transformation parameter may be relatively unimportant. For certain parameters, deterministic point predictions are biased, and plug-in prediction intervals are also biased. Stochastic simulation, as usually carried out, leads to badly biased predictions. A modification of the usual approach renders stochastic simulation predictions largely unbiased.     

The Relative Efficiency of Prediction Intervals

There is extensive literature on the measurement of the relative efficiencies of estimators, hypothesis tests, and confidence intervals. However, the important topic of the measurement of the relative efficiencies of prediction intervals has hitherto not been properly explored. Following Hodges and Lehmann (1970 Hodges , J. L. , Lehmann , E. L. ( 1970 ). Deficiency . Ann. Mathemat. Statist. 41 : 783 – 801 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), we require that a measure of the relative efficiency of two prediction intervals be stable in large samples. We examine the consequences of this requirement when these prediction intervals have coverage probability (a) equal to nominal and (b) asymptotically equal to nominal. Illustrations for independent and identically distributed data and time series data are provided.     

Optimal estimating function for estimation and prediction in semi-parametric models

In a seminal paper, Godambe [1985. The foundations of finite sample estimation in stochastic processes. Biometrika 72, 419–428.] introduced the ‘estimating function’ approach to estimation of parameters in semi-parametric models under a filtering associated with a martingale structure. Later, Godambe [1987. The foundations of finite sample estimation in stochastic processes II. Bernoulli, Vol. 2. V.N.V. Science Press, 49–54.] and Godambe and Thompson [1989. An extension of quasi-likelihood Estimation. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 22, 137–172.] replaced this filtering by a more flexible conditioning. Abraham et al. [1997. On the prediction for some nonlinear time-series models using estimating functions. In: Basawa, I.V., et al. (Eds.), IMS Selected Proceedings of the Symposium on Estimating Functions, Vol. 32. pp. 259–268.] and Thavaneswaran and Heyde [1999. Prediction via estimating functions. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 77, 89–101.] invoked the theory of estimating functions for one-step ahead prediction in time-series models. This paper addresses the problem of simultaneous estimation of parameters and multi-step ahead prediction of a vector of future random variables in semi-parametric models by extending the inimitable approach of 13 and 14. The proposed technique is in conformity with the paradigm of the modern theory of estimating functions leading to finite sample optimality within a chosen class of estimating functions, which in turn are used to get the predictors. Particular applications of the technique give predictors that enjoy optimality properties with respect to other well-known criteria.     

PREDICTION INTERVALS FOR SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE REGRESSION

ABSTRACT

The support vector machine (SVM), first developed by Vapnik and his group at AT&T Bell Laboratories, is being used as a new technique for regression and classification problems. In this paper we present an approach to estimating prediction intervals for SVM regression based on posterior predictive densities. Furthermore, the method is illustrated with a data example.     

Pitman comparisons of predictors of censored observations from progressively censored samples for exponential distribution

On the basis of a progressively censored sample, Basak et al. [On some predictors of times to failure of censored items in progressively censored samples. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2006;50:1313 –1337] considered the problem of predicting the unobserved censored units at various stages of progressive censoring. They then discussed several different point predictors of these censored units and compared them with respect to mean square prediction error. In this work, we use the Pitman closeness (PC) criterion to compare the maximum likelihood, best linear unbiased, best linear equivariant, and conditional median predictors (CMPs) of these progressively censored units. Next, we compare all these with respect to the median unbiased predictor in terms of PC. Numerical computations are then performed to compare all these predictors. By comparing our results to those of Basak et al. (2006), we note that our findings in the sense of PC are similar to theirs in which the CMP competes well when compared to all other predictors.     

Bayesian prediction of order statistics with fixed and random sample sizes based on k-record values from Pareto distribution

In this paper, the two-parameter Pareto distribution is considered and the problem of prediction of order statistics from a future sample and that of its geometric mean are discussed. The Bayesian approach is applied to construct predictors based on observed k-record values for the cases when the future sample size is fixed and when it is random. Several Bayesian prediction intervals are derived. Finally, the results of a simulation study and a numerical example are presented for illustrating all the inferential procedures developed here.     

Finite-population prediction under error-in-variables superpopulation models

The prediction problem in finite populations is considered under error-in-variables super population models. The models considered are the usual regression models involving at most two variables, x and y, where both may be measured with error. Properties of some classical predictors are investigated. A Bayesian approach is proposed.     

Nonparametric Prediction Intervals for Future Order Statistics in a Proportional Hazard Model

Consider k independent random samples with different sample sizes such that the ith sample comes from the cumulative distribution function (cdf) F _i  = 1 ? (1 ? F)^{α _i} , where α _i is a known positive constant and F is an absolutely continuous cdf. Also, suppose that we have observed the maximum and minimum of the first k samples. This article shows how one can construct the nonparametric prediction intervals for the order statistics of the future samples on the basis of these information. Three schemes are studied and in each case exact expressions for the prediction coefficients of prediction intervals are derived. Numerical computations are given for illustrating the results. Also, a comparison study is done while the complete samples are available.