“十三五”时期上海“四个中心”功能创新与开放战略研究

“十三五”时期,上海应在更高层次推动“四个中心”开放发展和参与全球竞争.进一步深化“四个中心”目标内涵和基本要求;借力自贸试验区,加快推进“四个中心”制度创新和功能拓展;以人民币国际化为动力,加快完善人民币全球中心功能;以内外贸一体化平台建设为抓手,加快推进国际贸易中心转型升级;深化国际航运综合试验区建设,提升国际航运中心“软实力”;以优化营商环境为抓手,进一步提升国际经济中心发展的能级;加快建设具有全球影响力的科技创新中心,助推“四个中心”功能协调发展.     

上海国际科技创新中心新一轮发展战略研究

上海国际科技创新中心新一轮发展要围绕高水平科技自立自强,按照“四个面向”“四个新”“四个第一”的工作要求,以“筑基、垒台、立柱、架梁”的战略思维,加快推进国际科技创新中心建设的创新基础培育、创新条件建设、创新体制机制构建和创新体系能力形成,加快构筑新阶段上海创新发展的战略优势,加快实现国际科技创新中心功能全面升级,为我国进入创新型国家前列提供坚实支撑。     

上海“五个中心”新一轮发展战略研究

上海要瞄准“科创为本、金融为纲、经济为目、航运和贸易为两翼”的战略定位,分两个阶段实现打造“三个圈层”的上海大都市圈、建设具有全球领导力的科技创新中心、叠加建设超级城市的战略目标。为此,要强化科技创新引领、升级科技创新中心,发挥金融联动、推动“五个中心”协调发展,推进国际经济中心向国际数字经济中心转型,推进国际贸易中心向服务化和数字化转型,推进国际航运中心向国际中转型航运中心转型。     

“十二五”时期加快建设上海国际经济金融、贸易、航运中心思路研究

“十二五”时期是上海“四个中心”建设的加速推进期。上海要牢牢把握战略机遇,以国际化、市场化、法治化为重点,进一步完善市场功能体系、市场机构体系、市场产品体系,聚焦重点,更加注重功能开发,更加注重扩大开放,更加注重环境优化,力争在新的起点上实现“四个中心”功能和制度创新大突破,形成具有全球资源配置能力的国际经济中心。     

上海全面深化“五个中心”建设的总体思路和关键举措

上海全面深化“五个中心”建设,应更好地发挥“五个中心”的联动效应,强化全球资源配置、科技创新策源、高端产业引领和开放枢纽门户功能,结合绿色低碳转型、服务国家重大战略及保障安全稳定等战略任务,打造具有世界影响力的现代化国际大都市,成为国内大循环的中心节点、国内国际双循环的战略链接及社会主义现代化国家建设的重要窗口,为经济强国建设做出更大贡献。     

上海建设具有全球影响力科技创新中心的战略思路与政策取向

上海建设具有全球影响力的科技创新中心,需要政府推动与市场导向相结合,处理好政府与市场的关系,应坚持“六个结合”:即体制机制创新与技术创新结合;区域特色与国际标准结合;国家战略需求与市场导向的创新相结合;建设“四个中心”与科技创新中心相结合;现有优势产业改造升级与发展新兴产业相结合;坚持创新型城市建设与区域协同创新相结合.     

制定《上海市推进科技创新中心建设条例》促进科创中心建议

制定《上海市推进科技创新中心建设条例》,既是搭建科技创新中心法律框架的必要,也是完善科技创新法规体系的需要.《条例》在立法目的、调整对象和调整手段上与《上海市科学技术进步条例》和《上海市促进科技成果转化条例》有诸多不同,不会造成立法的重复.《条例》需要明确科技创新中心的定位,完善科技管理体制,划定科技创新的区域布局,设定平台建设、科技市场体系建设和创新环境建设的制度机制.     

上海建设具有全球影响力科技创新中心战略研究

未来一个时期,上海要全面贯彻落实习近平总书记提出的“加快向具有全球影响力的科技创新中心进军”新定位、新要求,牢牢把握科技进步大方向、产业革命大趋势、集聚人才大举措,立足国家战略,大力实施创新驱动发展战略,围绕“由谁来创新”“动力哪里来”“成果如何用”3个基本问题,充分发挥市场在配置科技资源中的决定性作用,聚焦科技前瞻布局,聚焦体制机制创新,聚焦创新生态优化,聚焦新兴产业培育,聚焦人才激励机制,努力促进创新要素高度集聚、创新活力竞相迸发、创新成果持续涌现,推动城市核心竞争力不断提升,为实现中华民族伟大复兴中国梦作出应有贡献.     

关于上海“四个中心”建设的若干思考

"创新驱动,转型发展",最终要服务的是上海的"四个中心"建设。上海通过制度创新,推动了金融、贸易、航运"三个中心"的建设,但不能说上海的制度创新推动了经济中心的建设,因为金融、贸易、航运都是服务业,把信息技术加进去就是现代服务业;上海要成为"四个中心",还必须通过科技创新发展先进制造业、发展实体经济,而发展实体经济,更要注重发展文化创意产业,发展绿色经济、平台经济、健康经济,发展智能制造业。     

上海建设全球科技创新中心的目标与政策体系

上海建设全球科技创新中心的政策应该是一个系统的政策体系,要综合运用法律、经济以及行政手段,深化体制改革,强化机制创新,重点围绕创新资源整合机制、企业活力激活机制、市场价值实现机制、技术空间扩散机制和科技统筹管理体制的建立与完善,形成创新资源集聚、创新文化凸现、企业主体明确、市场导向突出、转化机制顺畅、扩散服务优化的技术创新新局面.     

工程研究的"是"与"应当"——从工程哲学谈起

工程是人类最基本的实践活动,是人类能动性、创造性的最重要、最基本的表现方式之一.现代工程不但深刻地改变着自然的面貌,也塑造了而且还在继续改变着现代社会的面貌,乃至塑造和改变着人本身.人类正是通过"造物"活动创造自己的历史,建造自己的生活世界,从而也创造人本身.     

“学生潮”与“民工潮”的关系及影响

本文通过对耒阳市暑假期间农村中小学生流动情况的考察。发现暑假期间外出的农村中小学生规模相当宏大，形成了一股与“民工潮”相对的“学生潮”。本文提出“学生潮”的概念，并揭示和剖析出“学生潮”与“民工潮”之间的内在复杂关系以及“学生潮”对社会尤其是对教育的负面影响。     

Theorizing Diaspora: Perspectives on "Classical" and "Contemporary" Diaspora

Cohen (1997) employed the term “classical” diaspora in reference to the Jews. Indeed, a vast corpus of work recognizes the Jewish people as examples of quintessential diasporic groups. However, a broader conceptualization of the term diaspora allows for the inclusion of immigrant communities that would be otherwise sidelined in the conventional literature on diaspora. This study is therefore a departure from the traditional diasporic literature, which tends to use the Jewish Diaspora as the archetype. It favours, rather, the classification of three principal broad historical waves in which the Jewish Diaspora can be interpreted as part of a classical period. The historicizing of diasporization for the purpose of this paper is achieved by an empirical discussion of the three major historical waves that influenced the diasporic process throughout the world: the Classical Period, the Modern Period, and the Contemporary or Late‐modern Period. The paper discusses these three critical phases in the following manner: first, reference is made to the Classical Period, which is associated primarily with ancient diaspora and ancient Greece. The second historical phase analyses diaspora in relation to the Modern Period, which can be interpreted as a central historical fact of slavery and colonization. This section can be further subdivided into three large phases: (1) the expansion of European capital (1500–1814), (2) the Industrial Revolution (1815–1914), and (3) the Interwar Period (1914–1945). The final major period of diasporization can be considered a Contemporary or Late‐modern phenomenon. It refers to the period immediately after World War II to the present day, specifying the case of the Hispanics in the United States as one key example. The paper outlines some aspects of the impact of the Latin American diaspora on the United States, from a socio‐economic and politico‐cultural point of view. While the Modern and Late‐modern periods are undoubtedly the most critical for an understanding of diaspora in a modern, globalized context, for the purpose of this paper, more emphasis is placed on the latter period, which illustrates the progressive effect of globalization on the phenomenon of diasporization. The second period, the Modern Phase is not examined in this paper, as the focus is on a comparative analysis of the early Classical Period and the Contemporary or Late‐modern Period. The incorporation of diaspora as a unit of analysis in the field of international relations has been largely neglected by both recent and critical scholarship on the subject matter. While a growing number of studies focus on the increasing phenomenon of diasporic communities, from the vantage of social sciences, the issue of diaspora appears to be inadequately addressed or ignored altogether. Certain key factors present themselves as limitations to the understanding of the concept, as well as its relevance to the field of international relations and the social sciences as a whole. This paper is meant to clarify some aspects of the definition of diaspora by critiquing the theories in the conventional literature, exposing the lacunae in terms of interpretation of diaspora and in the final analysis, establishing a historiography that may be useful in comparing certain features of “classical” diaspora and “contemporary” diaspora. The latter part of the paper is intended to provide illustrations of a contemporary diasporic community, using the example of Hispanics in the United States.     

"Sense" and "Intention" in Max Weber's Theory of Social Action

Ambiguities in Weber's theory of social action have been compounded in translation into English. American commentators have generally given a psychological twist to Weber's concepts of "intended sense" and "understanding," in terms of an "imputation of motive." Weber, on the other hand, distinguishes between the intended sense of an action and the actor's motivation. As a sociologist, he is interested, not in the imputation of motive to the individual actor, but in understanding social action in its "context of sense" in relation to "typical" or "cross-sectional" usages based on "consensus," that is, in its "cultural significance".     

从经营城市上升到经略城市

一、经营城市的积极作用及其局限性 经营城市说在近10年从国外引进,但经营城市的做法在改革开放后即逐渐推行,而且异常火爆,经营城市在城市经济活动中运用了市场机制,遵循市场规律,调动多方面的积极性,广泛吸纳生产要素,盘活城市资产,对利用各类城市资源取得了立竿见影的效果,使城市建设特别是房地产开发迅猛地发展起来.但经营城市本身亦有其局限性,经营的主体非城市政府莫属,而经营城市又是一种市场行为,其目标是追求经济效益,政府经营城市难免产生诸多弊端.     

"Ordinary people" and "death work": Palestinian suicide bombers as victimizers and victims

Applying criminological/victimological concepts and theories, the study addresses the social processes involved in Palestinians' suicide terrorism and describes Palestinians' pathways to suicide bombing. The data are derived from in-depth interviews of 7 male and female Palestinians serving prison sentences in Israel for attempted suicide bombing. The social background, context, and experiences of the interviewees, including their recruitment, interactions with the organizations that produce suicide bombing, the tangible and intangible incentives and rewards that motivated them to become suicide bombers, their preparation for the mission, and the strategies employed by the organizations to sustain recruits' resolve to conform to the plan are described and analyzed. The implications of the findings for theory and public policy are drawn and discussed.     

From "Us" to "Them": Diasporic Linkages and Identity Politics

Global diasporas-a type of social formation mediating economic, political, and cultural affairs across borders-have been a focus of globalization researchers for some time. However, up to now, little knowledge exists on how social identification affects business participation in diaspora communities and how such participation modifies social identification. This article, based on empirical research on diasporic linkages between Taiwanese transnationals and ethnic Chinese overseas, serves to illustrate a) how globalization has enhanced the practical and economic roles of diasporas, and b) how economic practices and ethnic identification interact within diasporic communities. The author argues that ethnic membership still remains contested, despite diasporas serving as flexible forms of social organization in the mediation of capital flow.