Calculating the density and distribution function for the singly and doubly noncentral F

Simple, closed form saddlepoint approximations for the distribution and density of the singly and doubly noncentral F distributions are presented. Their overwhelming accuracy is demonstrated numerically using a variety of parameter values. The approximations are shown to be uniform in the right tail and the associated limitating relative error is derived. Difficulties associated with some algorithms used for exact computation of the singly noncentral F are noted.     

A Note on the Noncentral Beta Distribution Function

The noncentral beta and the related noncentral F distributions have received much attention during the last decade, as is evident from the works of Norton, Lenth, Frick, Lee, Posten, Chattamvelli, and Chattamvelli and Shanmugam. This article reviews the existing algorithms for computing the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of a noncentral beta random variable, and proposes a simple algorithm, based on a sharp error bound, for computing the cdf. A variation of the noncentral beta random variable when the noncentrality is associated only with the denominator χ² and its computational details are also discussed.     

An alternative representation of noncentral beta and F distributions

In this paper the doubly noncentral beta and F distributions are represented alternatively by using the results on the product of two hypergeometric functions. Their moments and the cumulative distribution functions are also given in terms of hypergeometric functions, which can be easily calculated by the Mathematica package.     

A self-validating numerical method for computation of central and non-central F probabilities and percentiles

A self-validating numerical method based on interval analysis for the computation of central and non-central F probabilities and percentiles is reported. The major advantage of this approach is that there are guaranteed error bounds associated with the computed values (or intervals), i.e. the computed values satisfy the user-specified accuracy requirements. The methodology reported in this paper can be adapted to approximate the probabilities and percentiles for other commonly used distribution functions.     

Efficient computation of the noncentral x2 distribution

In this article we compare and contrast finite algorithms for computing the noncentral x² distribution function for odd or even degrees of freedom with the algorithms proposed recently by Ashour & Abdel-Samad (1990). We also obtain an alternative error bound for Ruben's (1974a) algorithm for even degrees of freedom and analyze the rate of convergence of two common infinite series representations for computing the cdf     

Density of the quotient of non-negative quadratic forms in normal variables with application to the F-statistic

The density of the quotient of two non-negative quadratic forms in normal variables is considered. The covariance matrix of these variables is arbitrary. The result is useful in the study of the robustness of theF-test with respect to errors of the first and second kind. An explicit expression for this density is given in the form of a proper Riemann-integral on a finite interval, suitable for numerical calculation.     

New representations of the noncentral chi-square density and cumulative

Representations of noncentral chi-square cumulative distribution function and probability density function are reviewed and new repre¬sentations are given. One representation of the cdf in terms of an integral is easily computed on any machine which has an accurate algorithm for computing the normal cdf.     

Power and Sample Size Determination When the Alternative Hypotheses are Given in Quantiles

The power of normal-theory tests about means depends on a noncentrality parameter which is a function of the unknown parameter σ. In order to calculate power and to solve sample-size problems based on power, differences between hypothesized and alternative values of the means are frequently selected as a multiple of σ, a choice which eliminates σ from the noncentrality parameter and permits a solution. Perhaps a more natural (but equivalent) way to express alternatives is to give one or more means as the quantile of order p (say Q_p ) of a distribution with another mean. As we will demonstrate, this kind of alternative also eliminates σ from the problem.     

The Correlated Bivariate Noncentral F Distribution and Its Application

This article proposes the singly and doubly correlated bivariate noncentral F (BNCF) distributions. The probability density function (pdf) and the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the distributions are derived for arbitrary values of the parameters. The pdf and cdf of the distributions for different arbitrary values of the parameters are computed, and their graphs are plotted by writing and implementing new R codes. An application of the correlated BNCF distribution is illustrated in the computations of the power function of the pre-test test for the multivariate simple regression model (MSRM).     

A Note on the Calculation of Pr{X 1 < X 2 < ··· < Xk }

Suppose that X_i are independent random variables, and that X_i has cdf F_i (x), 1 ≤ i ≤ k. Many statistical problems involve the probability Pr{X ₁ < X ₂ < ··· < X_k }. In this note a numerical method is proposed for computing this probability.     

The product <Emphasis Type="Italic">t</Emphasis> density distribution arising from the product of two Student’s <Emphasis Type="Italic">t</Emphasis> PDFs

The Student’s t distribution has become increasingly prominent and is considered as a competitor to the normal distribution. Motivated by real examples in Physics, decision sciences and Bayesian statistics, a new t distribution is introduced by taking the product of two Student’s t pdfs. Various structural properties of this distribution are derived, including its cdf, moments, mean deviation about the mean, mean deviation about the median, entropy, asymptotic distribution of the extreme order statistics, maximum likelihood estimates and the Fisher information matrix. Finally, an application to a Bayesian testing problem is illustrated.     

On an adjustment of degrees of freedom in the minimim mean squared error ertimator

In this paper, we consider an adjustment of degrees of freedom in the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator, We derive the exact MSE of the adjusted MMSE (AMMSE) estimator, and compare the MSE of the AMMSE estimator with those of the Stein-(SR), positive-part Stein-rule (PSR) and MMSE estimators by numerical evaluations. It is shown that the adjustment of degrees of freedom is effective when the noncentrality parameter is close to zero, and the MSE performance of the MMSE estimator can be improved in the wide region of the noncentrality parameter by the adjustment, ft is also shown that the AMMSE estimator can have the smaller MSE than the PSR estimator in the wide region of the noncentrality parameter     

Numerical computation of rectangular bivariate and trivariate normal and t probabilities

Algorithms for the computation of bivariate and trivariate normal and t probabilities for rectangles are reviewed. The algorithms use numerical integration to approximate transformed probability distribution integrals. A generalization of Plackett's formula is derived for bivariate and trivariate t probabilities. New methods are described for the numerical computation of bivariate and trivariate t probabilities. Test results are provided, along with recommendations for the most efficient algorithms for single and double precision computations.     

On the statistical computation of the sample multiple correlation moefficient

Based on the recursive formulas of Lee (1988) and Singh and Relyea (1992) for computing the noncentral F distribution, a numerical algorithm for evaluating the distributional values of the sample squared multiple correlation coefficient is proposed. The distributional function of this statistic is usually represented as an infinite weighted sum of the iterative form of incomplete beta integral. So an effective algorithm for the incomplete beta integral is crucial to the numerical evaluation of various distribution values. Let a and b denote two shape parameters shown in the incomplete beta integral and hence formed in the sampling distribution functionn be the sample size, and p be the number of random variates. Then both 2a = p - 1 and 2b = n - p are positive integers in sampling situations so that the proposed numerical procedures in this paper are greatly simplified by recursively formulating the incomplete beta integral. By doing this, it can jointly compute the distributional values of probability dens function (pdf) and cumulative distribution function (cdf) for which the distributional value of quantile can be more efficiently obtained by Newton's method. In addition, computer codes in C are developed for demonstration and performance evaluation. For the less precision required, the implemented method can achieve the exact value with respect to the jnite significant digit desired. In general, the numerical results are apparently better than those by various approximations and interpolations of Gurland and Asiribo (1991),Gurland and Milton (1970), and Lee (1971, 1972). When b = (1/2)(n -p) is an integer in particular, the finite series formulation of Gurland (1968) is used to evaluate the pdf/cdf values without truncation errors, which are served as the pivotal one. By setting the implemented codes with double precisions, the infinite series form of derived method can achieve the pivotal values for almost all cases under study. Related comparisons and illustrations are also presented     

Nonparametric Prediction Intervals for Future Order Statistics in a Proportional Hazard Model

Consider k independent random samples with different sample sizes such that the ith sample comes from the cumulative distribution function (cdf) F _i  = 1 ? (1 ? F)^{α _i} , where α _i is a known positive constant and F is an absolutely continuous cdf. Also, suppose that we have observed the maximum and minimum of the first k samples. This article shows how one can construct the nonparametric prediction intervals for the order statistics of the future samples on the basis of these information. Three schemes are studied and in each case exact expressions for the prediction coefficients of prediction intervals are derived. Numerical computations are given for illustrating the results. Also, a comparison study is done while the complete samples are available.     

Extended tests for non-zero between-study variance

The ANOVA F-test, James tests and generalized F-test are extended to test hypotheses on the between-study variance for values greater than zero. Using simulations, we compare the performance of extended test procedures with respect to the actual attained type I error rate. Examples are provided to demonstrate the application of the procedures in ANOVA models and meta-analysis.     

Model Selection for Linear Mixed Models Using Predictive Criteria

Predictive criteria, including the adjusted squared multiple correlation coefficient, the adjusted concordance correlation coefficient, and the predictive error sum of squares, are available for model selection in the linear mixed model. These criteria all involve some sort of comparison of observed values and predicted values, adjusted for the complexity of the model. The predicted values can be conditional on the random effects or marginal, i.e., based on averages over the random effects. These criteria have not been investigated for model selection success.

We used simulations to investigate selection success rates for several versions of these predictive criteria as well as several versions of Akaike's information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion, and the pseudo F-test. The simulations involved the simple scenario of selection of a fixed parameter when the covariance structure is known.

Several variance–covariance structures were used. For compound symmetry structures, higher success rates for the predictive criteria were obtained when marginal rather than conditional predicted values were used. Information criteria had higher success rates when a certain term (normally left out in SAS MIXED computations) was included in the criteria. Various penalty functions were used in the information criteria, but these had little effect on success rates. The pseudo F-test performed as expected. For the autoregressive with random effects structure, the results were the same except that success rates were higher for the conditional version of the predictive error sum of squares.

Characteristics of the data, such as the covariance structure, parameter values, and sample size, greatly impacted performance of various model selection criteria. No one criterion was consistently better than the others.     

An approximate degrees of freedom test for heteroscedastic two-way ANOVA

Heteroscedastic two-way ANOVA are frequently encountered in real data analysis. In the literature, classical F-tests are often blindly employed although they are often biased even for moderate heteroscedasticity. To overcome this problem, several approximate tests have been proposed in the literature. These tests, however, are either too complicated to implement or do not work well in terms of size controlling. In this paper, we propose a simple and accurate approximate degrees of freedom (ADF) test. The ADF test is shown to be invariant under affine-transformations, different choices of contrast matrix for the same null hypothesis, or different labeling schemes of cell means. Moreover, it can be conducted easily using the usual F-distribution with one unknown degree of freedom estimated from the data. Simulations demonstrate that the ADF test works well in various cell sizes and parameter configurations but the classical F-tests work badly when the cell variance homogeneity assumption is violated. A real data example illustrates the methodologies.     

An exact test for nbue class of survival functions

Let F(x) be a life distribution. An exact test is given for testing H₀ F is exponential, versusH₁Fε NBUE (NWUE); along with a table of critical values for n=5(l)80, and n=80(5)65. An asymptotic test is made available for large values of n, where the standardized normal table can be used for testing.     

THE MULTIPLE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AND FISHER'S A STATISTIC1

Fisher's A statistic, often called the adjusted R² statistic, is shown to be a close approximation to the maximum likelihood estimate of the multiple correlation coefficient, p², based on the marginal distribution of R². Expansions for the estimate are obtained. The same methods lead to maximum marginal likelihood estimators for the noncentrality parameters for noncentral X² and F.