线性混合效应模型的FIC选择准则

线性混合效应模型在许多科学领域都有重要应用,本文主要研究它的变量选择问题,我们推导了FIC变量选择准则,它通过选择能极小化感兴趣目标量之估计的均方误差的模型而提高估计效率。模拟结果表明本文提出的FIC准则与其他常用的模型选择准则相比具有较大的优势。     

Focused information criteria for copulas

In this paper, we extend the focused information criterion (FIC) to copula models. Copulas are often used for applications where the joint tail behavior of the variables is of particular interest, and selecting a copula that captures this well is then essential. Traditional model selection methods such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) aim at finding the overall best‐fitting model, which is not necessarily the one best suited for the application at hand. The FIC, on the other hand, evaluates and ranks candidate models based on the precision of their point estimates of a context‐given focus parameter. This could be any quantity of particular interest, for example, the mean, a correlation, conditional probabilities, or measures of tail dependence. We derive FIC formulae for the maximum likelihood estimator, the two‐stage maximum likelihood estimator, and the so‐called pseudo‐maximum‐likelihood (PML) estimator combined with parametric margins. Furthermore, we confirm the validity of the AIC formula for the PML estimator combined with parametric margins. To study the numerical behavior of FIC, we have carried out a simulation study, and we have also analyzed a multivariate data set pertaining to abalones. The results from the study show that the FIC successfully ranks candidate models in terms of their performance, defined as how well they estimate the focus parameter. In terms of estimation precision, FIC clearly outperforms AIC, especially when the focus parameter relates to only a specific part of the model, such as the conditional upper‐tail probability.     

A Bayesian approach with generalized ridge estimation for high-dimensional regression and testing

This paper adopts a Bayesian strategy for generalized ridge estimation for high-dimensional regression. We also consider significance testing based on the proposed estimator, which is useful for selecting regressors. Both theoretical and simulation studies show that the proposed estimator can simultaneously outperform the ordinary ridge estimator and the LSE in terms of the mean square error (MSE) criterion. The simulation study also demonstrates the competitive MSE performance of our proposal with the Lasso under sparse models. We demonstrate the method using the lung cancer data involving high-dimensional microarrays.     

A computationally fast alternative to cross-validation in penalized Gaussian graphical models

We study the problem of selecting a regularization parameter in penalized Gaussian graphical models. When the goal is to obtain a model with good predictive power, cross-validation is the gold standard. We present a new estimator of Kullback–Leibler loss in Gaussian Graphical models which provides a computationally fast alternative to cross-validation. The estimator is obtained by approximating leave-one-out-cross-validation. Our approach is demonstrated on simulated data sets for various types of graphs. The proposed formula exhibits superior performance, especially in the typical small sample size scenario, compared to other available alternatives to cross-validation, such as Akaike's information criterion and Generalized approximate cross-validation. We also show that the estimator can be used to improve the performance of the Bayesian information criterion when the sample size is small.     

Model averaging procedure for partially linear single-index models

This paper is concerned with model selection and model averaging procedures for partially linear single-index models. The profile least squares procedure is employed to estimate regression coefficients for the full model and submodels. We show that the estimators for submodels are asymptotically normal. Based on the asymptotic distribution of the estimators, we derive the focused information criterion (FIC), formulate the frequentist model average (FMA) estimators and construct proper confidence intervals for FMA estimators and FIC estimator, a special case of FMA estimators. Monte Carlo studies are performed to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over the full model, and over models chosen by AIC or BIC in terms of coverage probability and mean squared error. Our approach is further applied to real data from a male fertility study to explore potential factors related to sperm concentration and estimate the relationship between sperm concentration and monobutyl phthalate.     

Selection Strategy for Covariance Structure of Random Effects in Linear Mixed‐effects Models

Linear mixed‐effects models are a powerful tool for modelling longitudinal data and are widely used in practice. For a given set of covariates in a linear mixed‐effects model, selecting the covariance structure of random effects is an important problem. In this paper, we develop a joint likelihood‐based selection criterion. Our criterion is the approximately unbiased estimator of the expected Kullback–Leibler information. This criterion is also asymptotically optimal in the sense that for large samples, estimates based on the covariance matrix selected by the criterion minimize the approximate Kullback–Leibler information. Finite sample performance of the proposed method is assessed by simulation experiments. As an illustration, the criterion is applied to a data set from an AIDS clinical trial.     

A method of selecting the levels of regressor variables in lognormal regression model

Kupper and Meydrech and Myers and Lahoda introduced the mean squared error (MSE) approach to study response surface designs, Duncan and DeGroot derived a criterion for optimality of linear experimental designs based on minimum mean squared error. However, minimization of the MSE of an estimator maxr renuire some knowledge about the unknown parameters. Without such knowledge construction of designs optimal in the sense of MSE may not be possible. In this article a simple method of selecting the levels of regressor variables suitable for estimating some functions of the parameters of a lognormal regression model is developed using a criterion for optimality based on the variance of an estimator. For some special parametric functions, the criterion used here is equivalent to the criterion of minimizing the mean squared error. It is found that the maximum likelihood estimators of a class of parametric functions can be improved substantially (in the sense of MSE) by proper choice of the values of regressor variables. Moreover, our approach is applicable to analysis of variance as well as regression designs.     

A pseudo‐empirical best linear unbiased prediction approach to small area estimation using survey weights

The authors develop a small area estimation method using a nested error linear regression model and survey weights. In particular, they propose a pseudo‐empirical best linear unbiased prediction (pseudo‐EBLUP) estimator to estimate small area means. This estimator borrows strength across areas through the model and makes use of the survey weights to preserve the design consistency as the area sample size increases. The proposed estimator also has a nice self‐benchmarking property. The authors also obtain an approximation to the model mean squared error (MSE) of the proposed estimator and a nearly unbiased estimator of MSE. Finally, they compare the proposed estimator with the EBLUP estimator and the pseudo‐EBLUP estimator proposed by Prasad & Rao (1999), using data analyzed earlier by Battese, Harter & Fuller (1988).     

Covariate adjustment and estimation of mean response in randomised trials

Analyses of randomised trials are often based on regression models which adjust for baseline covariates, in addition to randomised group. Based on such models, one can obtain estimates of the marginal mean outcome for the population under assignment to each treatment, by averaging the model‐based predictions across the empirical distribution of the baseline covariates in the trial. We identify under what conditions such estimates are consistent, and in particular show that for canonical generalised linear models, the resulting estimates are always consistent. We show that a recently proposed variance estimator underestimates the variance of the estimator around the true marginal population mean when the baseline covariates are not fixed in repeated sampling and provide a simple adjustment to remedy this. We also describe an alternative semiparametric estimator, which is consistent even when the outcome regression model used is misspecified. The different estimators are compared through simulations and application to a recently conducted trial in asthma.     

The Statistical Properties of the Equity Estimator

In this article we consider the Equity estimator proposed by Krishnamurthi and Rangaswamy. We show that this estimator is inconsistent and does not necessarily improve on the mean squared error (MSE) of the least squares (LS) estimator. We perform a Monte Carlo experiment based on the price-promotion model used in marketing research, with marketing data, comparing the MSE of the Equity estimator to that of two empirical Bayes estimators and the LS estimator. We find that the empirical Bayes estimators have substantially smaller MSE than the Equity estimator in almost every case.     

Estimating Mark Functions Through Spectral Analysis for Marked Point Patterns

Classical techniques for modeling numerical data associated to a regular grid have been widely developed in the literature. When a trigonometric model for the data is considered, it is possible to use the corresponding least squares (classical) estimators, but when the data are not observed on a regular grid, these estimators do not show appropriate properties. In this article we propose a novel way to model data that is not observed on a regular grid, and we establish a practical criterion, based on the mean squared error (MSE), to objectively decide which estimator should be used in each case: the inappropriate classical or the new unbiased estimator, which has greater variance. Jackknife and cross-validation techniques are used to follow a similar criterion in practice, when the MSE is not known. Finally, we present an application of the methodology to univariate and bivariate data.     

A Generalized Diagonal Ridge-type Estimator in Linear Regression

This article introduces a general class of biased estimator, namely a generalized diagonal ridge-type (GDR) estimator, for the linear regression model when multicollinearity occurs. The estimator represents different kinds of biased estimators when different parameters are obtained. Some properties of this estimator are discussed and an iterative procedure is provided for selecting the parameters. A Monte Carlo simulation study and an application show that the GDR estimator performs much better than the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator under the mean square error (MSE) criterion when severe multicollinearity is present.     

A model selection criterion for discriminant analysis of high-dimensional data with fewer observations

This paper is concerned with the problem of selecting variables in two-group discriminant analysis for high-dimensional data with fewer observations than the dimension. We consider a selection criterion based on approximately unbiased for AIC type of risk. When the dimension is large compared to the sample size, AIC type of risk cannot be defined. We propose AIC by replacing maximum likelihood estimator with ridge-type estimator. This idea follows Srivastava and Kubokawa (2008). It has been further extended by Yamamura et al. (2010). Simulation revealed that the proposed AIC performs well.     

PREDICTION-FOCUSED MODEL SELECTION FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS

In order to make predictions of future values of a time series, one needs to specify a forecasting model. A popular choice is an autoregressive time‐series model, for which the order of the model is chosen by an information criterion. We propose an extension of the focused information criterion (FIC) for model‐order selection, with emphasis on a high predictive accuracy (i.e. the mean squared forecast error is low). We obtain theoretical results and illustrate by means of a simulation study and some real data examples that the FIC is a valid alternative to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for selection of a prediction model. We also illustrate the possibility of using the FIC for purposes other than forecasting, and explore its use in an extended model.     

Criterion for the Selection of a Working Correlation Structure in the Generalized Estimating Equation Approach for Longitudinal Balanced Data

The generalized estimating equation is a popular method for analyzing correlated response data. It is important to determine a proper working correlation matrix at the time of applying the generalized estimating equation since an improper selection sometimes results in inefficient parameter estimates. We propose a criterion for the selection of an appropriate working correlation structure. The proposed criterion is based on a statistic to test the hypothesis that the covariance matrix equals a given matrix, and also measures the discrepancy between the covariance matrix estimator and the specified working covariance matrix. We evaluated the performance of the proposed criterion through simulation studies assuming that for each subject, the number of observations remains the same. The results revealed that when the proposed criterion was adopted, the proportion of selecting a true correlation structure was generally higher than that when other competing approaches were adopted. The proposed criterion was applied to longitudinal wheeze data, and it was suggested that the resultant correlation structure was the most accurate.     

Mean squared error estimators of small area means using survey weights

Using survey weights, You & Rao [You and Rao, The Canadian Journal of Statistics 2002; 30, 431–439] proposed a pseudo‐empirical best linear unbiased prediction (pseudo‐EBLUP) estimator of a small area mean under a nested error linear regression model. This estimator borrows strength across areas through a linking model, and makes use of survey weights to ensure design consistency and preserve benchmarking property in the sense that the estimators add up to a reliable direct estimator of the mean of a large area covering the small areas. In this article, a second‐order approximation to the mean squared error (MSE) of the pseudo‐EBLUP estimator of a small area mean is derived. Using this approximation, an estimator of MSE that is nearly unbiased is derived; the MSE estimator of You & Rao [You and Rao, The Canadian Journal of Statistics 2002; 30, 431–439] ignored cross‐product terms in the MSE and hence it is biased. Empirical results on the performance of the proposed MSE estimator are also presented. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 38: 598–608; 2010 © 2010 Statistical Society of Canada     

The relative efficiency of the restricted estimators in linear regression models

This paper deals with the problem of multicollinearity in a multiple linear regression model with linear equality restrictions. The restricted two parameter estimator which was proposed in case of multicollinearity satisfies the restrictions. The performance of the restricted two parameter estimator over the restricted least squares (RLS) estimator and the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator is examined under the mean square error (MSE) matrix criterion when the restrictions are correct and not correct. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the restricted ridge regression, restricted Liu and restricted shrunken estimators, which are the special cases of the restricted two parameter estimator, to have a smaller MSE matrix than the RLS and the OLS estimators are derived when the restrictions hold true and do not hold true. Theoretical results are illustrated with numerical examples based on Webster, Gunst and Mason data and Gorman and Toman data. We conduct a final demonstration of the performance of the estimators by running a Monte Carlo simulation which shows that when the variance of the error term and the correlation between the explanatory variables are large, the restricted two parameter estimator performs better than the RLS estimator and the OLS estimator under the configurations examined.     

Comparisons of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">r</Emphasis> − <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis> class estimator to the ordinary least squares estimator under the Pitman’s closeness criterion

In the presence of multicollinearity, the r − k class estimator is proposed as an alternative to the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator which is a general estimator including the ordinary ridge regression (ORR), the principal components regression (PCR) and the OLS estimators. Comparison of competing estimators of a parameter in the sense of mean square error (MSE) criterion is of central interest. An alternative criterion to the MSE criterion is the Pitman’s (1937) closeness (PC) criterion. In this paper, we compare the r − k class estimator to the OLS estimator in terms of PC criterion so that we can get the comparison of the ORR estimator to the OLS estimator under the PC criterion which was done by Mason et al. (1990) and also the comparison of the PCR estimator to the OLS estimator by means of the PC criterion which was done by Lin and Wei (2002).     

Model selection for two-sample problems with right-censored data: An application of Cox model

For investigating differences between two treatment groups in medical science, selecting a suitable model to capture the underlying survival function for each group with some covariates is an important issue. Many methods, such as stratified Cox model and unstratified Cox model, have been proposed for investigating the problem. However, different models generally perform differently under different circumstances and none dominates the others. In this article, we focus on two sample problems with right-censored data and propose a model selection criterion based on an approximately unbiased estimator of Kullback-Leibler loss, which accounts for estimation uncertainty in estimated survival functions obtained by various candidate models. The effectiveness of the proposed method is justified by some simulation studies and it also applied to an HIV+ data set for illustration.     

Model averaging by jackknife criterion for varying-coefficient partially linear models

Abstract

This paper is concerned with model averaging procedure for varying-coefficient partially linear models. We proposed a jackknife model averaging method that involves minimizing a leave-one-out cross-validation criterion, and developed a computational shortcut to optimize the cross-validation criterion for weight choice. The resulting model average estimator is shown to be asymptotically optimal in terms of achieving the smallest possible squared error. The simulation studies have provided evidence of the superiority of the proposed procedures. Our approach is further applied to a real data.