Bayesian Analysis of Masked Series System Lifetime Data

The problem of analyzing series system lifetime data with masked or partial information on cause of failure is recent, compared to that of the standard competing risks model. A generic Gibbs sampling scheme is developed in this article towards a Bayesian analysis for a general parametric competing risks model with masked cause of failure data. The masking probabilities are not subjected to the symmetry assumption and independent Dirichlet priors are used to marginalize these nuisance parameters. The developed methodology is illustrated for the case where the components of a series system have independent log-Normal life distributions by employing independent Normal-Gamma priors for these component lifetime parameters. The Gibbs sampling scheme developed for the required analysis can also be used to provide a Bayesian analysis of data arising from the conventional competing risks model of independent log-Normals, which interestingly has so far remained by and large neglected in the literature. The developed methodology is deployed to analyze a masked lifetime data of PS/2 computer systems.     

Inference for the Dependent Competing Risks Model with Masked Causes of Failure

The competing risks model is useful in settings in which individuals/units may die/fail for different reasons. The cause specific hazard rates are taken to be piecewise constant functions. A complication arises when some of the failures are masked within a group of possible causes. Traditionally, statistical inference is performed under the assumption that the failure causes act independently on each item. In this paper we propose an EM-based approach which allows for dependent competing risks and produces estimators for the sub-distribution functions. We also discuss identifiability of parameters if none of the masked items have their cause of failure clarified in a second stage analysis (e.g. autopsy). The procedures proposed are illustrated with two datasets.     

Consistency of the Generalized MLE with Interval-Censored and Masked Competing Risks Data

We consider nonparametric estimation based on interval-censored competing risks data with masked failure cause. The generalized maximum likelihood estimator of the joint survival function of the failure time and the failure cause is studied under mixed case interval censorship and random partition masking. Strong consistency in the L ₁(μ)-topology is established for some finite measure μ which is derived from the joint censoring and masking distribution. Under additional regularity assumptions we also establish the strong consistencies in the topologies of weak convergence, point-wise convergence, and uniform convergence.     

Identifiability of masking probabilities in competing risks models with emphasis on Weibull models

Abstract

Lifetime data with masked failure causes arise in both reliability engineering and epidemiology. The phenomenon of masking occurs when a subject is exposed to multiple risks. A competing risks model with masking probabilities is widely used for the masked failure data. However, in many cases, the model suffers from an identification problem. We show that the identifiability of masking probabilities depends on both the structure of data and the cause-specific hazard functions. Motivated by this result, two existing solutions are reviewed and further improved.     

Inference for cumulative incidence on discrete failure times with competing risks

In the competing risks analysis, most inferences have been developed based on continuous failure time data. However, failure times are sometimes observed as being discrete. We propose nonparametric inferences for the cumulative incidence function for pure discrete data with competing risks. When covariate information is available, we propose semiparametric inferences for direct regression modelling of the cumulative incidence function for grouped discrete failure time data with competing risks. Simulation studies show that the procedures perform well. The proposed methods are illustrated with a study of contraceptive use in Indonesia.     

Bayesian analysis of competing risks with partially masked cause of failure

Summary. Bayesian analysis of system failure data from engineering applications under a competing risks framework is considered when the cause of failure may not have been exactly identified but has only been narrowed down to a subset of all potential risks. In statistical literature, such data are termed masked failure data. In addition to masking, failure times could be right censored owing to the removal of prototypes at a prespecified time or could be interval censored in the case of periodically acquired readings. In this setting, a general Bayesian formulation is investigated that includes most commonly used parametric lifetime distributions and that is sufficiently flexible to handle complex forms of censoring. The methodology is illustrated in two engineering applications with a special focus on model comparison issues.     

On Non-parametric Estimation of the Survival Function with Competing Risks

The non-parametric maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) are derived for survival functions associated with individual risks or system components in a reliability framework. Lifetimes are observed for systems that contain one or more of those components. Analogous to a competing risks model, the system is assumed to fail upon the first instance of any component failure; i.e. the system is configured in series. For any given risk or component type, the asymptotic distribution is shown to depend explicitly on the unknown survival function of the other risks, as well as the censoring distribution. Survival functions with increasing failure rate are investigated as a special case. The order restricted MLE is shown to be consistent under mild assumptions of the underlying component lifetime distributions.     

Accelerated failure time models for the analysis of competing risks

Competing risks are common in clinical cancer research, as patients are subject to multiple potential failure outcomes, such as death from the cancer itself or from complications arising from the disease. In the analysis of competing risks, several regression methods are available for the evaluation of the relationship between covariates and cause-specific failures, many of which are based on Cox’s proportional hazards model. Although a great deal of research has been conducted on estimating competing risks, less attention has been devoted to linear regression modeling, which is often referred to as the accelerated failure time (AFT) model in survival literature. In this article, we address the use and interpretation of linear regression analysis with regard to the competing risks problem. We introduce two types of AFT modeling framework, where the influence of a covariate can be evaluated in relation to either a cause-specific hazard function, referred to as cause-specific AFT (CS-AFT) modeling in this study, or the cumulative incidence function of a particular failure type, referred to as crude-risk AFT (CR-AFT) modeling. Simulation studies illustrate that, as in hazard-based competing risks analysis, these two models can produce substantially different effects, depending on the relationship between the covariates and both the failure type of principal interest and competing failure types. We apply the AFT methods to data from non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, where the dataset is characterized by two competing events, disease relapse and death without relapse, and non-proportionality. We demonstrate how the data can be analyzed and interpreted, using linear competing risks regression models.     

Testing dependence between the failure time and failure modes: An application of enlarged filtration

The model of independent competing risks provides no information for the assessment of competing failure modes if the failure mechanisms underlying these modes are coupled. Models for dependent competing risks in the literature can be distinguished on the basis of the functional behaviour of the conditional probability of failure due to a particular failure mode given that the failure time exceeds a fixed time, as a function of time. There is an interesting link between monotonicity of such conditional probability and dependence between failure time and failure mode, via crude hazard rates. In this paper, we propose tests for testing the dependence between failure time and failure mode using the crude hazards and using the conditional probabilities mentioned above. We establish the equivalence between the two approaches and provide an asymptotically efficient weight function under a sequence of local alternatives. The tests are applied to simulated data and to mortality follow-up data.     

Identification of longitudinal biomarkers for survival by a score test derived from a joint model of longitudinal and competing risks data

In this paper, we consider joint modelling of repeated measurements and competing risks failure time data. For competing risks time data, a semiparametric mixture model in which proportional hazards model are specified for failure time models conditional on cause and a multinomial model for the marginal distribution of cause conditional on covariates. We also derive a score test based on joint modelling of repeated measurements and competing risks failure time data to identify longitudinal biomarkers or surrogates for a time to event outcome in competing risks data.     

Calibrated predictions for multivariate competing risks models

Prediction models for time-to-event data play a prominent role in assessing the individual risk of a disease, such as cancer. Accurate disease prediction models provide an efficient tool for identifying individuals at high risk, and provide the groundwork for estimating the population burden and cost of disease and for developing patient care guidelines. We focus on risk prediction of a disease in which family history is an important risk factor that reflects inherited genetic susceptibility, shared environment, and common behavior patterns. In this work family history is accommodated using frailty models, with the main novel feature being allowing for competing risks, such as other diseases or mortality. We show through a simulation study that naively treating competing risks as independent right censoring events results in non-calibrated predictions, with the expected number of events overestimated. Discrimination performance is not affected by ignoring competing risks. Our proposed prediction methodologies correctly account for competing events, are very well calibrated, and easy to implement.     

Bounds for the hazard gradients in the competing risks set up

The joint survival function of the latent lifetimes in the dependent competing risks set up is nonidentifiable from the joint probability distribution of the observation (failure time, cause of failure). This paper concentrates on the hazard gradients associated with the joint survival function, for which we provide bounds in the general dependent case and improve these in case the type of dependence (e.g., RTI, RCSI, etc.) is known. This leads to bounds on net (marginal) hazard rates in terms of cause-specific hazard rates which are identifiable. The problem of estimation of these bounds is discussed at the end.     

Score tests for independence in semiparametric competing risks models

A popular model for competing risks postulates the existence of a latent unobserved failure time for each risk. Assuming that these underlying failure times are independent is attractive since it allows standard statistical tools for right-censored lifetime data to be used in the analysis. This paper proposes simple independence score tests for the validity of this assumption when the individual risks are modeled using semiparametric proportional hazards regressions. It assumes that covariates are available, making the model identifiable. The score tests are derived for alternatives that specify that copulas are responsible for a possible dependency between the competing risks. The test statistics are constructed by adding to the partial likelihoods for the individual risks an explanatory variable for the dependency between the risks. A variance estimator is derived by writing the score function and the Fisher information matrix for the marginal models as stochastic integrals. Pitman efficiencies are used to compare test statistics. A simulation study and a numerical example illustrate the methodology proposed in this paper.     

On the NBU ageing notion within the competing risks model

The classical competing risks model deals with failure times of items subject to multiple causes of failure. We propose a version of the well-known ‘new better than used’ and ‘new worse than used’ ageing notions for random lifetimes within a specific cause of failure in the competing risks set up. Various properties of these new notions are studied, including the closure under time-dependent scale changes, as well as their connection to the hazard rate functions of the competing risks model. A data analytic example is finally provided.     

Analysis of Competing Risks by Using Bayesian Smoothing

We consider the competing risks set-up. In many practical situations, the conditional probability of the cause of failure given the failure time is of direct interest. We propose to model the competing risks by the overall hazard rate and the conditional probabilities rather than the cause-specific hazards. We adopt a Bayesian smoothing approach for both quantities of interest. Illustrations are given at the end.     

Monitoring processes with data censored owing to competing risks by using exponentially weighted moving average control charts

In industry, process monitoring is widely employed to detect process changes rapidly. However, in some industrial applications observations are censored. For example, when testing breaking strengths and failure times often a limited stress test is performed. With censored observations, a direct application of traditional monitoring procedures is not appropriate. When the censoring occurs due to competing risks, we propose a control chart based on conditional expected values to detect changes in the mean strength. To protect against possible confounding caused by changes in the mean of the censoring mechanism we also suggest a similar chart to detect changes in the mean censoring level. We provide an example of monitoring bond strength to illustrate the application of this methodology.     

Progressively Type-II censored competing risks data for exponential distributions based on sequential order statistics

We consider the progressively Type-II censored competing risks model based on sequential order statistics. It is assumed that the latent failure times are independent and the failure of each unit influences the lifetime distributions of the latent failure times of surviving units. We provide explicit expressions for the likelihood function of the available data under the conditional proportional hazard rate (CPHR) and the power trend conditional proportional hazard rate (PTCPHR) models. Under CPHR and PTCPHR models and assumption that the baseline distributions of the latent failure times are exponential, classical and Bayesian estimates of the unknown parameters are provided. Monte Carlo simulations are then performed for illustrative purposes. Finally, two datasets are analyzed.     

Identification of Longitudinal Biomarkers in Survival Analysis for Competing Risks Data

In recent years, joint analysis of longitudinal measurements and survival data has received much attention. However, previous work has primarily focused on a single failure type for the event time. In this article, we consider joint modeling of repeated measurements and competing risks failure time data to allow for more than one distinct failure type in the survival endpoint so we fit a cause-specific hazards sub-model to allow for competing risks, with a separate latent association between longitudinal measurements and each cause of failure. Besides, previous work does not focus on the hypothesis to test a separate latent association between longitudinal measurements and each cause of failure. In this article, we derive a score test to identify longitudinal biomarkers or surrogates for a time to event outcome in competing risks data. With a carefully chosen definition of complete data, the maximum likelihood estimation of the cause-specific hazard functions is performed via an EM algorithm. We extend this work and allow random effects to be present in both the longitudinal biomarker and underlying survival function. The random effects in the biomarker are introduced via an explicit term while the random effect in the underlying survival function is introduced by the inclusion of frailty into the model.

We use simulations to explore how the number of individuals, the number of time points per individual and the functional form of the random effects from the longitudinal biomarkers considering heterogeneous baseline hazards in individuals influence the power to detect the association of a longitudinal biomarker and the survival time.     

Confidence interval procedures for system reliability and applications to competing risks models

System reliability depends on the reliability of the system’s components and the structure of the system. For example, in a competing risks model, the system fails when the weakest component fails. The reliability function and the quantile function of a complicated system are two important metrics for characterizing the system’s reliability. When there are data available at the component level, the system reliability can be estimated by using the component level information. Confidence intervals (CIs) are needed to quantify the statistical uncertainty in the estimation. Obtaining system reliability CI procedures with good properties is not straightforward, especially when the system structure is complicated. In this paper, we develop a general procedure for constructing a CI for the system failure-time quantile function by using the implicit delta method. We also develop general procedures for constructing a CI for the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the system. We show that the recommended procedures are asymptotically valid and have good statistical properties. We conduct simulations to study the finite-sample coverage properties of the proposed procedures and compare them with existing procedures. We apply the proposed procedures to three applications; two applications in competing risks models and an application with a $k\text{-out-of-}s$ system. The paper concludes with some discussion and an outline of areas for future research.     

Assessing component reliability using lifetime data from systems

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce a competing risks model for the lifetimes of components that differs from the classical competing risks models by the fact that it is not directly observable which component has failed. We propose two statistical methods for estimating the reliability of components from failure data on a system. Our methods are applied to simulated failure data, in order to illustrate the performance of the methods.