国内自我效能感的研究方法综述

目前,在我国有关自我效能感的研究已经涉及到了多个领域,具体有教育学领域、组织行为领域、心理健康领域,成为了心理学与社会学研究的热门问题,本文对国内自我效能感的研究方法进行了总结和归纳,其中包括问卷调查法、实验研究法、文献综述法和访谈法,论述了这些研究方法在自我效能感研究中的运用,最后,还对这些研究方法在自我效能感的研究上作出了展望。     

管理科学中的一个创新性研究——错误理论的提出、进展和展望

对错误理论的研究背景、动机和国内外的研究现状作了阐述,并系统地介绍了该理论的研究方法和研究工具,提出了错误理论和错误逻辑对管理实践、决策过程以及管理系统建模的重要作用,而且指出该理论对管理科学学派的长远影响.最后,对该理论的研究方向和实际应用作了前瞻性的介绍,指出其在理论深入和实践应用方面的巨大研究空间.     

和谐管理视角下的领导研究发展初探

从3个方面系统回顾了和谐管理视角下的领导研究,分析了和谐管理视角下战略、组织与领导研究之间的关系。和谐管理视角下的战略、组织和领导研究均基于演化、情境、互动的视角,依据不同的基本问题和侧重点对环境、组织和领导三元关系进行探索;领导作为"能动者",串联起了和谐管理视角下的战略、组织和领导的研究。此外,基于管理环境新变化、现有研究不足及和谐管理视角下领导研究特色围绕领导支配权、领导心智和行为以及领导作用讨论了和谐管理视角领导研究的未来发展。     

中国大陆台商人力资源管理研究述评

根据对中国知网和台湾博硕士论文资讯网两大数据库相关文献的检索,评述了国内外学坛关于中国大陆台商人力资源管理的研究成果与动态.首先陈述了中国大陆台商人力资源管理研究文献的概况,然后着重讨论了台商投资的动机、大陆员工的工作价值观、台籍派驻干部的本土化培训、大陆干部的选聘任用、员工激励研究和劳资关系研究,最后,阐明了大陆台商人力资源管理研究的进展和不足,指出了未来研究的方向.     

基于科学知识图谱的盈余管理研究前沿分析

针对当前国内外盈余管理实证研究中存在的信息量繁多、关系错综复杂、研究脉络不清晰等问题,运用科学计量学信息可视化方法,绘制了盈余管理研究的科学知识图谱,进一步明晰了盈余管理研究领域的核心研究群体、权威专家、主要国家或地区、核心期刊,以及各自的平行关系。研究全面展示了盈余管理研究的前沿网络图景,对于研究者全面掌握盈余管理研究领域的发展历程和前沿状况,明晰研究方向和研究脉络具有一定参考意义。     

国外物流服务质量研究述评

物流服务质量研究历时40年,在某些方面取得了一定的理论研究成果,但至今尚未形成完整的理论体系。系统地梳理和总结了国外物流服务质量研究的相关文献,认为物流服务质量研究具体可以划分为3个阶段:概念研究阶段、测量研究阶段、理论研究阶段,并着重对每一阶段的物流服务质量研究进行了分析和评论,进而提出了未来的研究展望。     

和谐管理理论的研究框架及主要研究工作

基于和谐管理理论的基本概念和假设,提出了和谐管理的基本函数关系、研究框架及相应的实证研究假设.组织、环境和领导特征的分析是和谐管理研究的起点,和谐主题的辨识、围绕和谐主题的和则、谐则及其耦合是和谐管理研究的重点.对和谐主题辨识,和则、谐则的理论和实证分析,和谐管理的耦合模型等研究工作进行了介绍,并对下一步面向应用方法和技术的研究进行了展望.     

转型背景下中国企业战略研究:特征、方法及主题分析——基于英文文献的探讨

尽管转型经济下的中国企业战略管理日益成为国内外学者关注的前沿领域,但在这一领域国内外研究仍然缺乏有效的联系和沟通.对于国外学者已有的研究成果,我国战略研究学者至今还缺少全面认识和深入梳理.为了弥补这一缺憾,本文通过广泛搜集1978年至2008年30年间国际优秀期刊上发表的、研究转型经济下中国企业战略问题的英文文献,评价了其文献数量变化、期刊、学者和机构的贡献以及研究主题、研究理论基础、采用的研究方法及研究风格,提炼和分析了国外学者在中国企业战略研究中的成果和观点,最后对未来本土学者如何实现将研究与国际接轨、突出自身研究特色提出了相关看法和建议.     

数据挖掘在中国的现状和发展研究

数据挖掘是人工智能和数据库研究的新兴领域,近年来,数据挖掘技术的理论与应用研究发展迅速,并引起了国内外研究人员的重视。本文以科学引文索引数据库(SCI)、工程索引数据库(EI)以及清华全文数据库(CNKI)中有关"数据挖掘"研究文章的统计数据为研究基础,对数据挖掘在我国研究的总体趋势、研究热点、研究分支三个方面进行分析和研究。本文分析了数据挖掘在我国的发展,并对进一步发展我国数据挖掘的理论研究和实际应用提出了建议。     

中国组织学习和学习型组织研究与实践的现状和发展方向

基于对中国期刊全文数据库2000年以来所发文章的搜索结果,首先,对在组织学习和学习型组织相关问题上发表的期刊论文进行了详细的统计分析,对主要研究成果进行了总结归纳.统计分析了论文的刊出时间和地区分布、研究方法、研究主题、基金资助等情况,并从组织、团队、个体多个层面深入分析了研究现状,同时提出了未来研究的发展方向.然后,基于文献上全国企业调查的结果,论述了我国企业组织学习和学习型组织实践方面的现状和发展方向.最后,指出研究领域和实践领域只有不断相互交流和共同进化,才会更好地推动我国组织学习和学习型组织领域研究与实践的持续健康发展.     

A Decisional Framework of Offshoring: Integrating Insights from 25 Years of Research to Provide Direction for Future*

Mirroring the growing trend for firms to support their operations by locating activities abroad, research on the practice of offshoring has increased considerably in recent years. However, despite the mounting research, understanding of the key factors influencing decision‐making for offshoring remains surprisingly limited due to fragmentation. In this study, we synthesize and integrate insights from different research domains in order to develop a comprehensive decisional framework for key offshoring decisions. The integrative decisional framework is based on a systematic review of offshoring research published in the most influential management and business journals in the past 25 years. In addition to providing a snapshot of the state of research on decision‐making for offshoring, this study aims to stimulate future research by identifying promising research opportunities. In particular, we propose that future research should use alternative theories to incorporate overlooked aspects of decision‐making, integrate different theories to account for the interdependencies between decisions, and adopt a portfolio perspective that considers each decision as part of an overall offshoring strategy.     

Extending the boundaries of strategic leadership research

This special issue was developed to extend the boundaries of strategic leadership research, to help bridge the micro-macro divide regarding theories of strategic leadership, and to bring together theories that have emerged independently. In this introductory editorial, we provide an overview of the research on strategic leadership and emphasize the need for further integration of research from the organizational behavior, industrial and organizational psychology, organizational economics, behavioral strategy, and strategic management fields. We then introduce and summarize the eleven articles we accepted for this special issue by classifying them into two broad themes: (a) Chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and (b) the dynamics of interactions among the CEO, the top management team, and the board. Finally, we propose recent theoretical and empirical foci for advancing strategic leadership research and offer a research agenda for future research highlighting several important research questions related to extending the dialogue among scholars across the different leadership and strategy domains.     

Enhancing the Practical Relevance of Research

This article seeks to encourage scholars to conduct research that is more relevant to the decisions faced by managers and policymakers, and addresses why research relevance matters, what relevance means in terms of a journal article, and how scholars can increase the relevance of their research. I define relevant research papers as those whose research questions address problems found (or potentially found) in practice and whose hypotheses connect independent variables within the control of practitioners to outcomes they care about using logic they view as feasible. I provide several suggestions for how scholars can enhance research relevance, including engaging practitioners in on‐campus encounters, at managerial conferences, and at crossover workshops; conducting site visits and practitioner interviews; working as a practitioner; and developing a practitioner advisory team. I describe several ways that scholars can convey relevant research insights into practitioners, including presenting at practitioner conferences, writing for practitioners in traditional crossover journals and in shorter pieces like op‐eds and blogs, and attracting the interest of those who write columns, blogs, and articles about research for practitioners. I conclude by describing a few ways that academic institutions can encourage more relevant research, focusing on journals, professional societies, and doctoral programs.     

管理的本质以及管理研究的评价

我国管理研究评价中,纯粹的理论化和纯粹的实践导向都会阻碍管理研究的发展,因此,有必要构建更为科学合理的评价体系,来提升管理研究的质量。在分析管理的本质、管理研究的特点以及管理研究成果表现形式的基础上,提出管理研究应该注重学术知识和经验知识的糅合、显性知识和隐性知识的转化乃至智慧的获取。针对管理成果的具体表现形式,将理论与应用、知识与智慧2个维度纳入管理研究评价,构建了管理研究评价的整合模型。     

The wider implications of business-model research

Business-model research has struggled to develop a clear footprint in the strategic management field. This introduction to the special issue on the wider implications of business-model research argues that part of this struggle relates to the application of five different perspectives on the term “business model,” which creates ambiguity about the conceptual boundaries of business models, the applied terminology, and the potential contributions of business-model research to strategic management literature. By explicitly distinguishing among these five perspectives and by aligning them into one overarching, comprehensive framework, this paper offers a foundation for consolidating business-model research. Furthermore, we explore the connections between business-model research and prominent theories in strategic management. We conclude that business-model research is not necessarily a “theory on its own” and that it can be more fruitfully understood as a theoretical mechanism for combining different literature streams. As such, business-model research is positioned as a central connecting component in the further development of the strategic management field.     

A Critical Reflection on the Experimental Method for Planning Research: Testing the Added Value of PSS in a Controlled Environment

For planning research to successfully generate usable mechanisms for planning practitioners more hypothesis-testing research designs are needed. Currently, the academic field seems more geared toward generating hypotheses, either by observing practice or from theoretical studies. This approach is especially common in research that generates knowledge of planning. In this paper, I map several relevant research designs that allow for such hypothesis testing and discuss their usability in planning research. Then, I particularly focus on the experimental method as a promising design for generating contextualized mechanisms for planning practice. I describe and analyze a study that aimed to develop mechanisms about the added value of knowledge technologies for the quality of planning. Two consecutive experiments are described in detail, after which the usability of the experimental method for planning research is discussed. Reflecting on these experiments indicate that the main strength of this research design is that it allows to create ideal circumstances for falsification (which is virtually impossible in planning practices. The main weakness is the ecological validity of findings, especially when the research is executed with students.     

The contribution of network research to managerial culture and practice

Although research on social networks has gained significant influence in the academic world, several factors seem to have lowered its echo in the business world. It is still unclear how this fast-growing stream of research has translated into solid implications for managerial action and decision making. Based on a review of recent research, this paper attempts to provide evidence that network research does have practical relevance. We focus on five areas where network research has introduced new angles and renewed the understanding of how organizations should tackle management issues. We also suggest directions for future research, with the same objective of placing the emphasis on strengthening the contribution of the approach to management practices.     

Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors

A recent trend in leadership research is to explore the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors. As this type of research has grown dramatically in the past several years, we seek to provide a systematic review of existing empirical research that has used a daily ESM study design to examine the leadership process. In this review, we reflect on the unique and important benefits a daily perspective on leadership provides for leadership research. We also provide a systematic review of the existing research on daily leadership, discuss the methodological and theoretical aspects of the studies identified in the review, and highlight the important findings of this research. Finally, we conclude by drawing upon the reviewed articles to provide recommendations for future scholarly work. Specifically, we give recommendations that will both broaden scholars' understanding of the daily leadership process as well as deepen understanding.     

Exploring the use of QPID: A collaborative study of B2B in the automotive industry

Deep and grounded understanding of complex socio-technical phenomena, such as business-to-business (B2B) information systems, requires a collaborative process of enquiry where the researcher works with practitioners to make sense and establish meaning. This suggests the need for interventionary approaches, such as action research and action case, supported by a method of notation for describing a co-constructed reality to make sense of inter-organizational settings and to undertake cross-case comparisons. This paper tests the conjecture that systems thinking and the qualitative politicized influence diagram (QPID) are an appropriate lens through which to study B2B information systems. It demonstrates how the QPID workshop is valuable in inter-organizational studies as a practical and appropriate method of collaborative investigation. The paper concludes by raising issues for research methodology in terms of limitations of the research method, recommendations for further development, and future plans for incorporating multiple partners in industry-level research.     

Internationalization of Digital Innovations: A Rapidly Evolving Research Stream

This perspective paper synthesizes the burgeoning literature on internationalization of digital innovations to identify promising areas for future research. We first integrate multiple perspectives on digital innovations to offer a coherent and unified definition of digital innovations. Next, we synthesize digital innovation research into a theoretical framework that discusses the interrelationship between digital innovations and international business environment and its implications for international penetration of digital innovations. Our synthesis of literature highlights the increased research focus on demand-side perspective as an appropriate theoretical framework to explain the unique dynamics of digital internationalization. Finally, we take account of recent trends in digital economy as well as important gaps in current literature to propose promising avenues for future research. We particularly emphasize the need to integrate current institutional transitions of a digital era as well as emerging theoretical perspectives such as demand-side perspective and opportunity logic in digital internationalization research. We hope our perspective paper will contribute toward a more systematic and theoretically grounded advancement of digital internationalization research.