基于战略转换的战略风险研究

战略转换和战略风险都是目前国外研究的热点,从战略转换的角度,在研究战略转换的内涵特征、理论基础和动因的基础上,对战略风险产生的要素、机理进行了分析,认为战略转换的战略风险与企业环境、动力机制、学习机制、压力与惯性以及支撑条件都有密切的关系,同时也提供了战略风险防范的方法和对策.     

ERM框架下企业的风险战略与核心竞争力研究

在ERM框架下,企业必须形成正确的风险战略,风险战略确定企业风险管理总体目标和控制性目标,指出实现目标的策略和途径,负责企业的发展安全,风险战略与发展战略、激励战略共同构成企业整体战略体系。公司治理结构、风险管理组织、风险管理文化是影响风险战略制定和实施的重要因素。企业发展要依靠核心竞争力,核心竞争力是企业整体战略的集中体现,风险战略保障核心竞争力的发展安全。     

国企重组的战略风险初探

重组战略作为一种资本运营的企业经营战略,我国国有企业积极参与实践,但由于重组战略本身的风险较高,而企业的决策者对重组战略的认识不足,尤其缺乏对重组战略风险的认识和有效管理控制,导致重组成功率较低。本文从战略角度对重组的风险产生及其管理和控制对策进行了分析与探讨,旨在提高我国企业运用重组战略的有效性。     

企业战略管理的风险分析及其防范

在企业战略管理过程中,风险防范及其控制起着举足轻重的作用.本文主要从企业战略制定、战略执行、战略控制三个方面进行了简单论述,以提高企业规避风险的能力.     

海外项目的异质性与民营企业“走出去”战略风险防范

本文通过分析民营企业"走出去"战略风险形成过程,对海外项目异质性与"走出去"战略风险关系进行探讨。研究发现,"走出去"战略风险水平差异较小的海外项目,其异质性差异明显,关键风险点不一致显著,这为防范民营企业"走出去"战略风险提供了出发点,从政府层面、中介机构和企业层面提出"走出去"战略风险防范路径。     

企业财务风险的种类及控制

企业财务风险是由于企业财务活动中存在各种不确定因素的影响,使企业财务收益与预期收益发生偏离,因而使企业蒙受损失的机会和可能。本文从财务风险的种类出发,讨论了对企业面对的财务风险的控制。     

集团公司战略风险管理的理论探讨

本文对集团公司战略管理过程中产生战略风险的机制从公司整体运行的角度进行研究,提出了公司战略风险管理的系统化理论模型,并从公司的环境、资源、能力和公司主题战略四个方面分析了战略风险产生的风险机理。并提出了环境和资源对公司战略主题目标的实现的影响及产生风险的机制。     

动态风险控制与财务可持续性发展战略

企业从其创业到衰退的整个过程中,由于所处内外部环境的差异,面临的风险内容及特征不断变化,直接影响着企业的生存与发展。本文根据企业不同阶段的风险特征,提出了基于动态风险控制的财务可持续发展战略。在这个没有真正的起点和终点的动态过程中,以动态风险控制为基础的财务战略规划,不断为企业寻求成功机会及减少失败损失,更具有全局性特征。     

考虑顾客行为和风险因素的定价及配给研究

本文研究的是考虑顾客(包括投机者和战略消费者)行为和风险因素的定价及配给问题。垄断厂商在需求不确定的有限时间内销售定量易逝商品,追求既定收益下风险最小的定价目标。投机者追逐买卖最大利润,战略消费者力求购买支付最小,二者在厂商不变价下基于市场预期价格安排购入时机。研究结果表明,厂商、投机者和战略消费者的行为策略间存在博弈均衡;在均衡价格范围内,投机存在是增加或减少厂商期望收益取决于价格和销量变化的收益效应;投机者投机不确定需求可分散厂商收益风险,投机确定需求只会激励消费者战略购买;定价辅以配给既可遏制过度投机,又可平衡战略购买;厂商承担的风险随价格升高而增加。     

战略审计的风险评估研究

全球金融危机的爆发引发了审计领域对风险控制与战略审计这两大课题的高度关注.本文基于风险控制观的视角,在解析战略风险与战略审计概念的基础上,探索战略审计的风险评估方法,旨在促使企业战略审计的风险管理系统趋于完善化.     

集团公司战略风险属性的识别研究

集团公司的战略风险源于公司战略、环境、资源和竞争能力四要素之间的动态不和谐,它具有七种表现形态或征兆。本文据此构建了识别战略风险属性等级的数学方法,并将其应用在青岛啤酒有限集团公司的战略风险识别中。     

基于战略地图和BSC的企业整合型战略控制系统研究

本文首先回顾战略控制的理论演进,界定企业整合型战略控制系统的基本目标与功能.紧着,本文提出基于平衡记分卡的企业战略诊断控制系统,旨在控制战略的实施;并且提出基于战略地图的企业战略交互控制系统,旨在把握战略的不确定性从而控制战略的内容.最后,本文融合上述两类系统组成一个企业整合型战略控制系统,为快速、高效地实施战略提供最全面的保障.     

Strategic Manufacturing Planning Systems and Their Linkage to Planning System Success

Academics and practitioners alike are focusing more attention on manufacturing strategy after having recognized the important role it plays in shaping the success of industrial firms. Even though research in this area has increased in the last decade, the focus of much of that work has been on the content rather than the process of the manufacturing strategy. Consequently, this study attempts to understand the important elements of the strategic manufacturing planning process and its effectiveness. Borrowing from the extant literature in the fields of strategic management and information systems, we propose a research model that relates strategic manufacturing planning system design to planning system success. Using structured questionnaires, empirical data is collected from over 200 manufacturing executives to test the model hypotheses. Planning process in manufacturing was found to be a bottom‐up approach from a corporate or business perspective, which differs from the top‐down planning process prevalent in strategic information systems planning process. Findings also indicate that greater planning system success in manufacturing is associated with a planning system that combines some “rational” elements (formality, comprehensiveness, control focus, longer horizon) with others that lend adaptability (wider participation and more intense interaction). But the strategic manufacturing planning system is more than just a collection of independent planning characteristics. Instead, it can be viewed as a gestalt planning system whereby planning characteristics move together in affecting overall planning system success.     

董事会对公司战略过程评价:逻辑架构与指标体系

公司的战略管理是所有管理活动的重中之重.它包括战略判断、计划与预算活动、战略执行以及适威Adaptive)与交互(Interactive)性的战略控制体系.而现代公司治理原则要求董事会应关注和评价公司的战略管理活动.本文进一步认为,在资本市场不够发达的情况下,董事会应关注公司战略管理的奎过程为此,我们提出了一个针对公司战略管理体系有效性评价的基本框架和评价指标体系,目的在于使公司治理有效地作月于管理过程,最终为企业创造价值.     

国内战略风险研究的元分析

本文从中国知网4个数据库中筛选出150篇关于战略风险研究的文章,用元分析方法,从发表年份、作者来源、作者学科背景、研究主题的侧重点和主要研究方法等5个维度,分析国内战略风险研究的现状及不足,并探讨战略风险研究的未来方向。     

The role of cognitive load in effective strategic issue management

Firms have different ways of addressing issues emerging from outside their regular calendar-driven strategy processes. These practices tend to be unstructured, organization specific, and highly dependent on the characteristics of the strategic issues themselves. Building on three dimensions of cognitive load—intrinsic, germane, and extraneous cognitive load—we extend existing research on strategic issue management by showing how different team-level choices in strategic issue processing and organizational congestion interact in their effects on a firm's strategic issue management performance. Based on an in-depth analysis of all 92 strategic issue decisions in a large multinational firm during a three-year period, we find that organizational disturbances influence strategic issue initiation by top management, which in turn influences the quality of strategic issue management practices and subsequent performance outcomes. We conclude by providing recommendations for managers on how they can decrease the sensitivity of their companies' strategic issue systems to external disturbances.     

Conjoint effects of interacting strategy-making processes and lines of defense practices in strategic Risk Management: An empirical study

The ability to contain adverse effects of major risks under turbulent conditions and exploit the opportunities they present are fundamental concerns in strategic management and various institutions promote enterprise risk management (ERM) to deal with these challenges. Yet, our knowledge about how ERM affects performance and interacts with corporate strategy-making processes is limited. The ERM frameworks impose first and second lines of defense practices to integrate business operations and corporate risk oversight. Emergent strategies generate responsive initiatives and strategic planning coordinates updated actions. Hence, this study analyzes the conjoint effects of these ERM practices and strategy-making processes based on a large corporate sample and finds that ERM practices depend on strategy-making to attain effective risk outcomes. The application of ERM frameworks can, therefore, not be assessed in isolation, but must consider corporate strategy-making. This has implications for the way we conduct research on strategic risk management, how executives approach risk oversight and policy-makers impose formal risk governance requirements.     

转型经济中的战略剥离分析:以中国上市企业为例

随着转型经济中企业并购与重组活动的日益增多,理论界和实业界都期望有适合转型经济的理论来指导企业的重组行为.为此,本文以战略反馈和代理理论为理论基础.探讨以中国为代表的转型经济中企业战略剥离的动因.通过对1999-2003年中国上市企业剥离行为的分析,本文发现中国上市企业的剥离行为主要出于战略考虑,包括并购后整合的需要、过度多元化调整的需要以及绩效改进的需要;传统的代理理论则缺乏解释力度.这一结果表明,中国企业已经能够根据战略需要来进行业务重组,同时也呼吁政府和业界加强公司治理,以充分发挥公司治理的作用.     

Setting Risk Priorities: A Formal Model

This article presents a model designed to capture the major aspects of setting priorities among risks, a common task in government and industry. The model has both design features, under the control of the rankers (e.g., how success is evaluated), and context features, properties of the situations that they are trying to understand (e.g., how quickly uncertainty can be reduced). The model is demonstrated in terms of two extreme ranking strategies. The first, sequential risk ranking , devotes all its resources, in a given period, to learning more about a single risk, and its place in the overall ranking. This strategy characterizes the process for a society (or organization or individual) that throws itself completely into dealing with one risk after another. The other extreme strategy, simultaneous risk ranking , spreads available resources equally across all risks. It characterizes the most methodical of ranking exercises. Given ample ranking resources, simultaneous risk ranking will eventually provide an accurate set of priorities, whereas sequential ranking might never get to some risks. Resource constraints, however, may prevent simultaneous rankers from examining any risk very thoroughly. The model is intended to clarify the nature of ranking tasks, predict the efficacy of alternative strategies, and improve their design.