非合作博弈两阶段生产系统DEA并购效率评价

如何选择并购对象及预测并购可行性是企业管理者在并购决策过程中常面临的问题。针对企业并购预测问题,本文以两阶段生产系统的决策单元为研究对象,研究数据包络分析方法在预测并购可行性方面的应用。该生产系统有两个明显的特点:(1)决策单元由两个阶段串行子系统构成,(2)两个子系统一个处于主导地位,而另一个处于从属地位。两个或者两个以上决策单元并购为一个虚拟决策单元。本文在分析由决策单元整体效率与其子系统效率之间关系的基础上,引入非合作博弈的思想,提出了基于非合作博弈的DEA模型评估虚拟决策单元两阶段生产系统的并购效率:即在保持现有的产出水平和生产效率的前提下,分别求解虚拟决策单元及其子系统的并购效率,分析虚拟决策单元如何通过两个子系统实现整个系统的成本节约。最后,将模型应用于台湾24家非寿险保险公司的仿真分析。由于文章提出的方法能够有效地分析虚拟决策单元内部子系统的并购有效性水平,同时考虑子系统之间的主从关系,因此,能够发掘影响虚拟决策单元并购效率的内部因素,因而能够为管理者并购决策提供更精确有效的管理信息,提高并购决策的科学性。     

工业用水系统效率评价:考虑污染物可处理特性的两阶段DEA

提高水资源使用效率和污水处理效率是解决目前水资源短缺的重要途径。中国工业用水系统可分为生产用水子系统和污水处理子系统。本文考虑两个子系统之间的联系,并区分污染物在两个子系统中的弱处理和强处理特性,提出了一种基于DEA的两阶段评价模型。应用本文提出的新模型分析中国30个省级区域的工业用水系统的效率,结果表明: 中国省级区域工业用水整体效率不高,且地域分布特征明显,东部、西部、中部效率依次递减; 中国工业用水系统的非有效性主要源于污水处理效率的影响;工业用水系统效率与地区水资源禀赋存在一定的关系,水资源短缺的地区用水效率相对较高。文章所提出的方法兼顾生产用水子系统和污水处理子系统之间的相互影响,能够同时评价两个子系统效率和工业用水系统的整体效率,能有效发现系统中影响整体效率的关键环节,且可以应用于其他能源效率评价问题,具有明显的实际应用价值。     

基于主从博弈的两部门并行系统的效率评价

本文研究了一类典型并行系统的效率评价问题：（1）决策单元由两个并行的子单元组成;（2）在整个系统中,某一子单元居于主导地位,另一子单元居于从属地位;（3）两个子单元之间存在部分共享的投入资源,且无法明显区别该资源在不同子单元之间的分配比例。在分析决策单元整体效率及内部子单元效率的基础上,基于主从博弈思想,提出一种能同时确定系统整体效率及内部子单元效率的评价方法,该方法能够在评价系统效率的同时,实现共享资源的有效分配。最后,采用一个实例分析说明了所提方法的合理性和有效性。     

资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型

经典的数据包络分析(DEA)模型将决策单元看作"黑箱",忽视决策单元的内部过程,必然会高估决策单元的效率。本文研究了一种资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价方法,针对此类生产过程的内部过程,研究其内部运行机制对整体效率的影响。本文提出的模型实质上是一类特殊的网络DEA模型,其评价原理有别于已有的研究成果,但更有助于管理者确定生产过程的非有效来源及其效率改进方向。实例证实本文方法的合理性。     

两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型

数据包络分析(DEA)作为一种数学规划方法,已经被广泛用来评价一个决策单元相对于其它决策单元的效率。经典的DEA模型把决策单元看作一个“黑箱”,对决策单元的内部运行机制不作深入的研究。本文以一个两阶段生产系统为例,从生产系统的内部过程出发,提出一个基于DEA的模型以合理评估该决策单元的相对效率。本文提出的模型实质上是一类特殊的网络DEA模型,其评价原理有别于已有的研究成果,但确实有助于管理者确定生产过程(如供应链)的非有效来源及其效率改进方向。     

基于整体效率的区间DEA方法研究

针对现有的区间DEA方法采用非统一指标数据进行效率评价的不足,本文在分析现有区间DEA方法的基础上,提出一种基于整体效率的区间DEA方法。该方法能够在多决策单元系统整体效率最大化的同时,得到统一的各决策单元投入/产出的精确数据及各指标权重,一次性求解出所有决策单元的效率。最后,采用一个算例分析说明文章所提方法的合理性和优越性。     

基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价

由于复杂的竞争环境,共享资源下的交互系统组织形式变得越来越普遍,因此有必要开发一种新的方法来衡量这些系统与子系统的效率。针对复杂系统的绩效评价问题,本文提出资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法予以应对。该方法在测定系统总效率的基础上,运用Stackelberg博弈方法构建模型求解出唯一的子系统(阶段)效率。最后,将该方法应用于我国40所“一流大学”科研系统绩效评价中,评价结果反映出一定的科研系统特征,并验证了该方法的有效性。     

非独立并联生产系统的DEA效率评价研究

对复杂生产系统进行效率评价,是改善其生产效率的基础.针对非独立并联结构生产系统的效率评价问题开展研究.首先,将两阶段非独立并联生产系统等价为先并联后串联结构的混联生产系统;其次,将混联生产系统的整体效率定义为各串联子系统效率的乘积,而各个串联子系统的效率则定义为内部各并联子系统效率的加权和,并给出了对应的DEA效率评价模型;最后,有关定理和算例分析证实了该模型能更合理地评价此类生产系统的技术效率,能够更大程度地挖掘系统整体性能改善的潜力.     

具有双重角色和非期望要素的供应商评价两阶段DEA模型

在基于DEA方法的供应商评价过程中,会出现供应商同时具有双重角色要素和非期望输出要素的情形。文章提出了一个处理双重角色要素的新思路,认为DEA模型中双重角色要素同时扮演了输入和输出两个角色,所有双重角色要素本质上就是网络DEA模型中的中间变量,并同时认为包含双重角色要素的生产系统一定能分解成为多个子系统,其中的双重角色要素既是一个子系统的输入,同时又是另一个子系统的输出。为测度供应商的效率,基于已有关系型两阶段DEA模型,将供应商的生产运营视为两阶段过程,其双重角色要素视为两阶段过程的中间变量,并通过将所有输出以加权和的形式表达,但对非期望输出用负的权重的方式,提出了一个具有双重角色和非期望输出要素的供应商评价两阶段DEA模型,最后用一个实例验证了方法的可行。     

具有独立子系统的DEA模型及其应用

考虑到现有的DEA模型基本都是针对单系统的,而仅有的多系统模型[10]也是在假设决策单元相互独立并且不存在规模收益的条件下给出的,本文首先建立了3个评价具有独立子系统的决策单元相对有效性的DEA模型,即假设存在规模收益的模型(1),允许存在组内合作的模型(2),组内与组间都可以进行合作的模型(3),并通过分析3个模型之间的关系得到了决策单元通过组内或者组间合作带来的收益,同时证明了模型的一些性质以及决策单元相对有效与子系统相对有效之间的关系,进而应用这3个模型对1997年我国制造业的东、西、中三个区域的域内以及域间合作问题作了研究.结果表明:本文建立的模型不仅可以得到不同省市制造业的整体效率,而且还可以得到各省市制造业的不同行业的效率以及通过域内或域间合作带来的收益,从而得到运作和管理效率低下的根本原因.     

A fair evaluation of certain stage in a two-stage structure: revisiting the typical two-stage DEA approaches

The efficiency of decision processes with a two-stage structure has been studied by some modified versions of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology, such as the relational or centralized model, and the non-cooperative model. After revisiting the rationale of the centralized model provided by the literature, we find that some unfairness exist in its efficiency evaluation of certain stage. This unfairness leads to the usual underestimation of the overall efficiency by the centralized model. Furthermore, because the independent DEA model for one stage ignores its relation and coordination with the other stage and the two-stage system, externalities between these members may arise and lead to the seeming contradiction in efficiencies derived by independent DEA models for the stages and the black box system. Therefore, we argue that the efficiency of certain stage in the context of a two-stage structure should be reevaluated instead of simply using the independent DEA model. A sequence of leader-follower procedures, with data adjustment on intermediates, is proposed to eliminate the externalities and to ensure a fair evaluation. We find that, after this data adjustment, the reevaluation of the second stage for a given Decision Making Unit (DMU) yields the same result as obtained by the standard DEA model regarding the two-stage as a black box. Moreover, some explicit relations are established between the black box model, the centralized model, and the non-cooperative model. Two typical examples taken from the literature illustrate our main results. Our findings also imply that more emphasis should be placed on the game theoretic DEA approach to model the efficiency evaluation of two-stage processes.     

Stage efficiency evaluation in a two-stage network data envelopment analysis model with weight priority

Conventional DEA models treat the entire production system as a black box and ignore its internal structures. To address this issue, many studies have examined the DEA efficiencies of two-stage systems in which all outputs of the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. Based on game theory, the non-cooperative model and centralized model were developed for such a two-stage network structure. However, for the centralized model with multiple optimal solutions and the non-cooperative model, an assumption is required as to whether the first or second stage should be assigned the absolute priority for optimization. In many cases, certain circumstances might exist in which one stage does not completely dominate the other stage. In this paper, we develop a methodology for assessing the overall and stage efficiencies by considering the different and DMU-specific degree of priority given to the stages. Particularly, the non-cooperative model and the centralized model can be deemed as special cases. Moreover, we compare the proposed approaches with the existing approaches, which indicates that our approaches can greatly reduce the computational burden. Two empirical examples are used to demonstrate the proposed approach.     

DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings

A number of studies have used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of the countries in Olympic games. While competition exists among the countries in Olympic games/rankings, all these DEA studies do not model competition among peer decision making units (DMUs) or countries. These DEA studies find a set of weights/multipliers that keep the efficiency scores of all DMUs at or below unity. Although cross efficiency goes a further step by providing an efficiency measure in terms of the best multiplier bundle for the unit and all the other DMUs, it is not always unique. This paper presents a new and modified DEA game cross-efficiency model where each DMU is viewed as a competitor via non-cooperative game. For each competing DMU, a multiplier bundle is determined that optimizes the efficiency score for that DMU, with the additional constraint that the resulting score should be at or above that DMU 's estimated best performance. The problem, of course, arises that we will not know this best performance score for the DMU under evaluation until the best performances of all other DMUs are known. To combat this “chicken and egg” phenomenon, an iterative approach leading to the Nash equilibrium is presented. The current paper provides a modified variable returns to scale (VRS) model that yields non-negative cross-efficiency scores. The approach is applied to the last six Summer Olympic Games. Our results may indicate that our game cross-efficiency model implicitly incorporates the relative importance of gold, silver and bronze medals without the need for specifying the exact assurance regions.     

基于最近距离投影的DEA两阶段效率评价方法研究

数据包络分析是进行效率评价最重要的方法之一。传统的数据包络分析理论主要寻找有效前沿面上的最远距离投影，在极大化无效性指数的同时也面临着效率改进的巨大难度和高额成本。对于具有两阶段内部生产结构的决策单元，本文从考虑最小改进难度的视角出发，提出了最近距离投影的两阶段效率评价方法。该方法首先得到所有强有效决策单元的线性组合，且这些组合均占优于被评价的两阶段决策单元。然后建立了两阶段范围调整效率评价模型，在确定具有最近投影距离的占优组合的同时，得到了两阶段评价效率。最后，本文运用我国32家上市银行的年度数据对所提出方法进行了应用验证。     

Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach

The objective of this paper is to estimate the ecological efficiency of paper mills along the Huai River in China. The main characteristic of the ecological efficiency evaluation problem is that an undesirable output of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and a non-discretionary input (BOD emission quota) should be considered simultaneously. By analyzing the impacts of the non-discretionary input on decision-making units’ (DMUs) desirable and undesirable outputs, a non-radial output-oriented DEA model is proposed. In the proposed model, we describe a new approach of defining reference set that requires reference units operate in a similar environment on average. We employ the model to provide efficient inputs/outputs targets for DMU managers to improve DMUs’ efficiencies. Based on the developed model, impacts of the non-discretionary input on DMUs’ returns are also analyzed. We illustrate the proposed model, using real data, for 32 paper mills along the Huai River in China.     

Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern

In a two-stage system with two divisions connected in series, fairly setting the target outputs for the first stage or equivalently the target inputs for the second stage is critical, in order to ensure that the two stages have incentives to collaborate with each other to achieve the best performance of the whole system. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) as a non-parametric approach for efficiency evaluation of multi-input, multi-output systems has drawn a lot of attention. Recently, many two-stage DEA models were developed for studying the internal structures of two-stage systems. However, there was no work studying fair setting of the target intermediate products (or intermediate measures) although unreasonable setting will result in unfairness to the two stages because setting higher (fewer) intermediate measures means that the first (second) stage must make more efforts to achieve the overall production plan. In this paper, a new DEA model taking account of fairness in the setting of the intermediate products is proposed, where the fairness is interpreted based on Nash bargaining game model, in which the two stages negotiate their target efficiencies in the two-stage system based on their individual efficiencies. This approach is illustrated by an empirical application to insurance companies.     

DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks

In practice, systems are often composed of a group of sub-units. Each sub-unit has a set of performance metrics that are classified as inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Conventional DEA views such a system as a “black-box”, other DEA-based models are developed to investigate the inner structure, either with a serial structure where components are connected by intermediate products, or with a parallel system under the key assumption that all sub-units are associated with the same type of inputs and outputs (in differing amounts) without the links. In many applications, however, this property of identical input/output factors may not hold. For example, factories may have various manufacturing lines whose inputs and outputs differ from one another. The current paper proposes a series of DEA models to accommodate settings where non-homogenous sub-units operate in parallel network structures with intermediate measures or links. Both the overall performance of the entire parallel network system and efficiency decomposition for each sub-unit can be evaluated through our method.