基于Supply-Hub运作模式的供应商协同补货策略研究

Supply-Hub作为整合管理不同供应商零件库存的供应链节点,同时也承担了供应物流协同运作管理平台的功能.本文考虑加工-装配系统中存在的因一种零件缺货而造成其它配套使用的零件滞存的问题.研究了一种基于Supply-Hub运作模式,在供应商之间可以共享补货及库存信息的条件下,供应商协同补货策略,并与供应商分散补货模式下的基本补货模型进行比较分析.通过算例验证了该补货策略能有效降低供应链系统成本以及供应商成本.     

不确定环境下的Supply-hub协同补货决策

个性化需求与零部件创新使得产品需求和补货提前期不确定,对供应链补货决策和运行成本产生重要影响。将提前期不确定因素引入Supply-hub协同补货研究中,探讨提前期随机和需求不确定情况下,考虑零部件配套性的三供应商单制造商生产两定制产品的Supply-hub协同补货决策问题;提出了三种补货策略,以供应链运行成本最小化为目标,建立不同策略下的供应链补货模型并求解最优补货批量和供应链最小运行成本;发现三种补货策略均存在唯一最优补货批量,基于Supply-hub的两种协同补货策略和基于分散决策的供应商独立补货策略各有优势,但基于Supply-hub的批量及时间协同的补货策略恒优于基于Supply-hub的集中补货策略。最后,通过MATLAB进行算例分析验证结论,发现基于Supply-hub的批量及时间协同的补货策略能有效降低需求不确定性带来的成本增加风险;通用件的提前期波动对于供应链期望运行成本的影响要高于定制件提前期波动的影响,因此在进行供应链补货策略选择时更加关注通用件提前期。     

爱尔朗型按订单装配系统最优生产——库存控制策略研究

本文研究具有复杂装配结构的爱尔朗型按订单装配(ATO)系统的组件生产与库存优化控制问题。系统涉及多种组件,一个最终产品和多类客户需求。在此系统中,各种组件的生产时间服从爱尔朗分布,各类客户的需求为泊松到达过程。针对不同客户需求类型:产品需求与独立组件需求且同为销售损失型,建立基于马尔可夫决策过程(MDP)的平均总成本模型,应用动态规划方法求解最优策略。仿真模拟方法实现最优策略,并通过数值实验分析多生产阶段和系统参数对最优策略的影响。研究结果表明,爱尔朗型生产时间ATO系统的最优策略为状态依赖型策略,即组件的生产与库存分配由动态基础库存水平值和动态库存配给水平值控制。对于任一组件,其基础库存水平值和库存配给水平值均随着生产阶段的增加而降低,且生产阶段对基础库存水平值和平均总成本的影响较显著。     

基于库存分担策略的装配系统准时供货模型研究

本文考虑一个由多供应商和单制造商构成的装配系统。当市场的需求时间无法确定时,制造商通过对供应商设定合理的库存分担策略来降低自身成本,供应商则需要自行决定对制造商的补货时间并承担相应的库存持有成本和延迟惩罚成本。文章同时建立了供应商之间的纳什博弈模型和以制造商为主方的主从博弈模型,以找到供应商的最佳供货时间和制造商最优的库存承担时限。通过对比不同模式下供应链的整体绩效,找到实现供应链协调运作的必要条件,并通过数据分析进一步证明相关结论。     

部分短缺量拖后下基于顾客敏感度的补货策略适用范围研究

顾客对缺货数量和等待时间的敏感度影响着部分短缺量拖后率。基于此,根据顾客对缺货数量和等待时间的敏感度以及成本结构,对部分短缺量拖后下不同补货策略的适用范围进行了研究,得出以下结论:(s,S)连续性检查策略适用于单位缺货和丢单成本较高的库存系统;(t,S)周期性检查策略和(t,s,S)混合策略适用于单位缺货和丢单成本较低的库存系统;在单位缺货和丢单成本较低的库存系统中,当顾客对缺货数量较敏感时,(t,s,S)混合策略的运作成本更低,否则(t,S)周期性检查策略更适用,而顾客对等待时间的敏感度对补货策略适用范围的影响不明显。     

基于PI的企业动态库存补货模型与算法

PI(physical internet)环境下的物流网络具有互联、开放和共享的特点,缺货的PI-枢纽或零售商可根据货源选择策略动态选择为其补货的供应商或PI-枢纽。为解决PI环境下库存补货问题,提出了IB-EB(installation-echelon)混合补货策略。以最小化库存补货成本为目标,补货量和再订购点为决策变量,构建了PI环境下的动态库存补货模型。针对该混合整数非线性规划模型,应用粒子群优化算法求解出多个补货预案,再将其带入仿真环境循环优化求解。最后,以中国航空器材进出口公司为例,验证了模型可解性及算法的可行性。结果表明PI环境下货源策略的选择对库存补货成本和补货策略具有十分重要的影响,为企业在不同补货条件下选择货源提供了参考依据。     

VMI环境下库存竞争性产品的补货策略及最优货架空间的确定

本文在文献[1]的研究基础上,通过深入剖析FKO模型,运用动态规划方法,探讨了呈现特殊需求性质的库存竞争性产品在VMI环境下的多期动态补货策略,以及传统库存管理中不加考虑的库存空间优化问题。本文一方面是对FKO模型的补充与扩展,同时也证实了对于在特定的VMI补货环境下采用多期库存盘查模式的供应商来说,封顶式的补货策略是最优的,并且其关于最优补货水平的多期决策都是无远见的。因此收益分享合同下的单期最优库存水平可以作为设定最优货架展示空间的依据。     

服务多类需求串行供应链的最优控制策略

研究由一系列生产环节采用串行方式组成多级供应链的最优控制策略.在此供应链中,原材料经过各级生产环节顺序加工形成最终产品.各级生产环节的加工时间服从随机分布.对最终产品存在多类随机需求.在每个时刻,管理者需要决定:1)是否该启动某个生产环节的生产;2)当有需求到达时,是否该满足此需求.管理者期望系统运行的总期望折扣成本最小.构造了该系统的马尔可夫决策模型并深入研究了其最优控制策略及其动态协同特性.在生产策略方面,证明系统的最优生产策略就是对各级生产环节采用动态的基本库存策略.该策略的动态协同特性主要体现在各级生产环节的最优基本库存水平受其他生产环节的库存水平影响.在产品分配方面,证明系统的最优分配策略是动态配给策略.该策略的动态协同特性主要体现在每类随机需求最优配给水平受各级生产环节的库存水平影响.     

供求不确定下零部件供应商横向协同研究

考虑了由2个供应商与1个制造商组成的按订单装配的供应链模型。在供应商的零部件供应不确定、制造商的客户需求不确定的环境下,从多供应商的视角来研究如何通过供应商之间形成零部件横向协同,向制造商齐套供应零部件,从而降低制造商的期望总库存成本。首先,建立了单周期和多周期的理论模型,并对形成协同前后的期望总库存成本进行了比较;然后,通过模拟仿真的方法,对模型进行验证和比较,并分析了不同的缺货成本对最优订单量、最优订至点和最小期望总库存成本的影响。结果表明,多供应商之间的零部件横向协同降低了制造商的期望总库存成本,提高了对客户需求的响应。     

基于CPFR的分销商可替代协同补货模型

针对CPFR对多级供应链库存决策和可替代性对订货概率的约束问题,给出了考虑订单分割情况下分销商库存持有成本等五种平均成本的分销商可替代协同补货策略。采用主体的建模和仿真(ABMS)方法,构建了三种情景下基于CPFR的零售商再订货点和分销商再订货点之间的协同补货模型,分析了分销商可替代性对协同补货的影响。采用REPAST模拟软件对基于ABMS模型建立的目标函数进行了数值仿真分析,其结果表明所构建的模型是有效的。     

带学习效应的双渠道供应链库存策略研究

针对具有学习行为的双渠道供应链问题,本文研究了两种分销渠道并存下的最优库存策略。有限计划期内,分销商通过传统销售和在线销售来满足下游顾客的需求。两种分销渠道下的销售单价为时变不减线性函数,当系统中各周期的生产订购固定成本以一定的概率具有学习效应行为时,分别建立了非变质产品生产存贮问题的混合整数约束优化模型以及易变质产品存贮问题的无约束混合整数优化模型,所建立模型的目标为极大化分销商总利润函数。对于这两类模型,通过分析其最优解的性质,利用将生产订购次数松弛为连续变量的技巧证明了最优解存在的唯一性。给出了最优策略的求解方法并比较了两类模型最优利润函数值的大小。最后通过数值算例对上述模型进行了验证,数值结果表明当供应链系统中存在学习效应行为时,该系统能够获得更多的利润。     

Multiple In‐Cycle Transshipments with Positive Delivery Times

We study a centralized inventory sharing system of two retailers that are replenished periodically. Between two replenishments, a unit can be transshipped to a stocked‐out retailer from the other. It arrives a transshipment time later, during which the stocked‐out retailer incurs backorder cost. Without transshipment, backorder cost is incurred until the next replenishment. Since the transshipment time is shorter than the time between two replenishments, transshipments can reduce the backorder cost at the stocked‐out retailer and the holding costs at the other retailer. The system is directed by a centralized inventory manager, who minimizes the long‐run average cost consisting of replenishment, holding, backorder, and transshipment costs. The transshipment policy is characterized by hold‐back inventory levels, which are nonincreasing in the remaining time until the next replenishment. The transshipment policy differs from those in the literature because we allow for multiple transshipments between replenishments, positive transshipment times, and backorder costs. We also discuss the challenges associated with positive replenishment time and develop upper and lower bounds of average cost in this case. Bounds are numerically shown to have an average gap of 1.1%. A heuristic solution is based on the upper bound and differs from the optimal cost by at most this gap.     

Inventory Commitment and Prioritized Backlogging Clearance with Alternative Delivery Lead Times

We propose a model where customers are classified into two groups: short lead‐time customers who require the product immediately and long lead‐time customers to whom the supplier may deliver either immediately or in the next cycle. Unmet orders are backlogged with associated costs. Specifically, the supplier faces two problems: how the on‐hand inventories should be allocated between the two classes of customers and how the backlogged orders should be cleared when replenishments arrive. We treat the former as an inventory commitment problem and handle the latter with priority rules. We characterize and compare the inventory commitment policies with three priority rules in clearing backlogs. We also explore the optimal inventory replenishment decision and evaluate the performance of each priority rule.     

Coordinated scheduling of production and delivery stages with stage-dependent inventory holding costs

This paper considers a problem of integrated decision-making for job scheduling and delivery batching wherein different inventory holding costs between production and delivery stages are allowed. In the problem, jobs are processed on a facility at a production stage and then delivered at the subsequent delivery stage by a capacitated vehicle. The objective is to find the coordinated schedule of production and delivery that minimizes the total cost of the associated WIP inventory, finished product inventory and delivery, where both the inventory costs are characterized in terms of the weighted flow-time and the delivery cost is proportional to the required number of delivery batches. It is proved that the problem is NP-hard in the strong sense. Thereupon, three heuristic algorithms are derived. Some restricted cases are also characterized as being solvable in polynomial time. Numerical experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the derived heuristic algorithms.     

Point‐of‐Use Hybrid Inventory Policy for Hospitals

Modern point‐of‐use technology at hospitals has enabled new replenishment policies for medical supplies. One of these new policies, which we call the hybrid policy, is currently in use at a large U.S. Midwest hospital. The hybrid policy combines a low‐cost periodic replenishment epoch with a high‐cost continuous replenishment option to avoid costly stockouts. We study this new hybrid policy under deterministic and stochastic demand. We develop a parameter search engine using simulation to optimize the long‐run average cost per unit time and, via a computational study, we provide insights on the benefits (reduction in cost, inventory, and number of replenishments) that hospitals may obtain by using the hybrid policy instead of the commonly used periodic policies. We also use the optimal hybrid policy parameters from the deterministic analysis to propose approximate expressions for the stochastic hybrid policy parameters that can be easily used by hospital management.      

Hedging strategic flexibility in the distribution optimization problem

Motivated by the increasing prevalence of flexibility hedging in corporate-level risk management programs, this paper focuses on the treatment of hedging operational risks in the coordinated replenishment and shipment for distribution systems. The forward option pricing model with the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model for stochastic demand forecasting is adopted for constructing inventory volume flexibility. We therefore propose a hedge-based coordinated inventory replenishment and shipment (HCIRS) methodology for flexibly making inventory hedging and optimal routing assignment decisions as well as coordinating replenishment and shipment policies. The HCIRS methodology provides insight into strategic flexibility adopted for a real-life inventory–distribution problem faced by one of the major East Asia food supply networks and turns out to be very efficient. The proposed HCIRS methodology has provided evidence of better results than the traditional operational techniques for the presented case in this paper.     

连续生产模式下的不常用备件联合采购优化分析

针对连续性生产企业不常用备件管理缺货费用难以确定的实际情况,讨论了服务水平约束的基于随机连续盘点策略的联合补充(s,C,S)随机库存问题,经与单独补充策略相比,发现其经济效益明显。同时对影响备件联合采购费用节约的因素进行敏感性分析,指出了进行此类备件库存优化的方向。     

Supply Chain Coordination in a Market with Customer Service Competition

We consider a market with two competing supply chains, each consisting of one wholesaler and one retailer. We assume that the business environment forces supply chains to charge similar prices and to compete strictly on the basis of customer service. We model customer service competition using game‐theoretical concepts. We consider three competition scenarios between the supply chains. In the uncoordinated scenario, individual members of both supply chains maximize their own profits by individually selecting their service and inventory policies. In the coordinated scenario, wholesalers and retailers of each supply chain coordinate their service and inventory policy decisions to maximize supply chain profits. In the hybrid scenario, competition is between one coordinated and one uncoordinated supply chain. We discuss the derivation of the equilibrium service strategies, resulting inventory policies, and profits for each scenario, and compare the equilibria in a numerical study. We find that coordination is a dominant strategy for both supply chains, but as in the prisoner's dilemma, both supply chains are often worse off under the coordinated scenario relative to the uncoordinated scenario. The consumers are the only guaranteed beneficiaries of coordination.     

The Effects of Sharing Upstream Information on Product Rollover

The process of introducing new and phasing out old products is called product rollover. This paper considers a periodic‐review inventory system consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer, where the manufacturer introduces new and improved products over an infinite planning horizon using the solo‐roll strategy. We consider two scenarios: (1) the manufacturer does not share the upstream information about new‐product introduction with the retailer and (2) the manufacturer shares the information. For each scenario, we first derive the decentralized ordering policy and the system‐optimal ordering policy with given cost parameters. We then devise an optimal supply chain contract that coordinates the inventory system. We demonstrate that when the inventory system is coordinated, information sharing improves the performance of both supply chain entities. However, this may not be true if the inventory system is not coordinated. We also show that under the optimal contract, the manufacturer has no incentive to mislead the retailer about new‐product information in the information‐sharing model. When demand variability increases, information sharing adds more benefits to the coordinated supply chain. Our research provides insights about coordinating product, financial, and information flows in supply chains with product rollover.     

供应商管理库存应对突发事件

本文研究短生命周期供应链,它由一个生产商和一个销售商组成,供应商替销售商管理库存。首先指出供应商管理库存同样存在激励冲突,出现双边际效应,即分权决策下供应商的存货量小于供应链利润最大的库存量。接下来,提出一个使供应链达到合作的合约--未售货物补偿合约,即,销售商要对没有售完的货物进行补偿。该合约具有参数简单,管理费用低,且能将供应链利润在供应商和销售商之间任意分配。然后研究当突发事件导致供应商的生产费用(包括采购费用,运输费用等)发生变化对供应链的影响。最后,提出一个能应对突发事件并使供应链达到合作的合约。利用数值例子说明合约的价值。