推进我国都市圈发展的基本思路

发达国家经济发展的历史表明,一个国家走向现代化的重要标志是发达的工业化和高度的城市化.在全球经济一体化不断深入的背景下,随着交通技术和信息技术的高度发展,产业和人口在空间上不断的集聚与扩散,从而促成了大都市圈的形成和发展.建立大北京、大上海、大武汉、珠三角都市圈等构想相继出现,都市圈的规划工作在江苏等一些省份也陆续展开.按都市圈形式推进城市化、组织区域经济运行,已逐步从理论走向实践.     

新功能主义视域下的东亚区域治理

新功能主义是个存在已久的一体化理论,颇受哈斯等学者的反思或质疑。但由于区域治理依赖于区域整合的发展与完善,一体化理论仍对当下区域治理研究和政策实践具有深刻的借鉴意义。为此,本文论述新功能主义在政治、外溢以及政治忠诚感等方面的理论洞见,进而探讨新功能主义对东亚区域治理的借鉴意义和价值。本文认为,研究者和决策者应该进一步关注技术、贸易、能源、渔业等特定领域的功能逻辑,促使这些领域的经济政策和政治后果得到跨国精英的认同,并在区域治理中发挥重要角色的作用。     

论长三角区域生态治理政府间的协作

长三角区域作为中国综合实力最强的区域之一,在经济高速发展的同时,区域内的生态治理问题日益凸显。区域内各政府间面临着生态治理合作理念淡薄、生态补偿机制不完善、利益协调机制不健全、政绩考核体系单一等问题。面对这些问题,区域内政府要更新思想观念,建立＂双赢＂的利益协调机制、建立健全法律机制、健全生态补偿机制以及通过完善政绩评估体系等途径来推动生态治理合作。     

大都市圈发展经济整合机制研究的背景和意义

在经济全球化和区域经济一体化的内在驱动下,21世纪国际经济竞争的主体已经不是企业,也不是完全意义上的国家,而是以中心城市为核心的大都市圈或大都市带。研究大都市圈发展的经济整合机制背景和意义不仅为大都圈的发展构建了理论框架,也为我国发展大都市圈经济提供了实际的指导意义。     

信用赋能社会治理创新的逻辑、需求与路径

社会信用体系建设是我国经济社会高质量发展背景下市场监管和社会治理创新的重要举措,它包括信用优化公共资源配置、信用创新政府监管机制、信用维护市场经济秩序等维度,是推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要保障。我国新发展阶段推动信用赋能社会治理创新要把握政府构建新发展格局、打造共建共治共享治理新模式、深化“放管服”改革的现实需要,通过打造信用数智底座、提升信用监管效能、强化区域信用协同、完善信用豁免机制等创新举措来夯实社会治理基础、推动政务服务升级、打造多元共治格局、强化主体权益保护。     

日本多重治理结构下的区域创新政策研究

经济全球化和跨国创新网络的形成和发展,对日本传统的创新模式带来了巨大挑战。与国家创新政策相比,区域创新政策更加灵活,更适合依据区域的不同特点进行调整,因而更适于应对全球技术创新领域的竞争。日本正由更多依赖国家创新,向依靠区域创新和构建创新体系转变。日本通过完善包括知识集聚示范区在内的区域创新模式、政策工具,以及合理分配在多重治理结构下区域创新管理机构的管理权限和责任,实现了不同创新主体之间的互动与合作,缩小了与全球技术创新水平及区域技术创新水平的差距,促进了日本创新能力的提升。     

欧盟海洋治理模式论析

海洋问题的重要性使欧盟开始关注海洋治理,并在实践中发展出特定的治理结构,囊括主体、客体、机制和目标四部分。欧盟海洋治理模式反映欧盟与治理主体的互动关系,受到治理区域、治理能力不对称程度和治理意愿强弱三个因素影响。在海洋治理域内,欧盟的海洋治理模式主要依据治理能力划分为竞争型和主导型,其中竞争型治理以制度竞争为主要手段,通过国际规则处理与全球其他行为体的互动关系,而主导型治理下欧盟发挥关键性作用,推广规范和标准。在海洋治理域外,欧盟的海洋治理模式依据治理能力和治理意愿划分为参与型和兼容型,在参与型治理下欧盟发挥辅助性作用,在兼容型治理下欧盟倾向于减少制度竞争,推动治理机制对接。欧盟海洋治理模式面临治理能力与意愿不匹配、成员国协调困境和主体地位弱化的局限性。未来欧盟将持续参与全球海洋治理,在实践中完善和扩展治理模式。     

中欧试验式治理模式比较

随着欧洲一体化进程的深入,欧盟不得不面对一个复杂共同体的治理难题。试验主义治理模式的出现有效地应对了这一挑战。这一模式的核心机制是同行审议和惩罚性缺省。它通过基于执行经验的反复迭代过程实现了规则的制定和修正。这一模式的出现挑战了欧盟治理中既有的观念和信条。中国比欧盟更早地开始运用这一机制实现大国的治理和转型。只是这一机制在当下中国面临着越来越多的限制,而欧盟的试验主义却在国际范围内影响日益增大。我们应该在追求法治化目标的同时,努力保持体制的灵活性。     

区域集团的宪政之路——东盟宪章与欧盟宪法的比较研究

立宪并确立法律实体地位是区域集团走向宪政之路的重要标志,其蕴含着双重意义:区域集团通过立宪来捍卫地区一体化的成果;通过立宪来完善区域集团的权力机制建设.欧盟宪法和东盟宪章的出台是区域集团宪政之路的突出反映,但是由于两个地区一体化的程度差异,欧盟和东盟的宪政之路则呈现出明显的层次差异.通过比较分析区域集团的宪政之路有助于认识区域集团的机制发展和未来走向.     

大力发展数字经济 持续深化数字福州建设研究

数字经济是引领全球经济增长的新引擎。发展数字经济对福州促进实体经济转型升级、改善民生保障,增进社会福祉、治理现代化具有重要的意义。福州数字经济蓬勃发展,基本实现"数字化、网络化、智能化",但在数字经济发展中面临着数字化转型阻力较大、数字人才供给不足等问题。基于此,应从培育数字技术人才、促进传统产业数字化转型、完善数据应用监管体系、完善法律法规体系等方面提出措施,推动数字福州实现高质量发展。     

国家治理现代化进程中的社会治理创新

国家治理概念在近几年的学术研究中时时出现。将国家治理与现代化结合起来,将国家治理现代化作为一个国家改革攻坚阶段的重大战略是执政的中国共产党启动新一轮思想解放运动的标志。国家治理现代化是在扬弃旧式现代化之后探寻的中国特色社会主义建设之路。国家治理现代化不仅让改革具有了新的意义,而且赋予社会治理创新全新的性质,规定了未来中国式社会治理的新体系。     

Global Governance and State Governance: Two Strategic Considerations in Contemporary China

Governance is a kind of holistic governance and the notion of governing holistically should be established. The holisticity of governance is reflected in the unity and coordination between value rationality and instrumental rationality, normative appeal and practical appeal as well as global governance and state governance. Global and state governances are two strategic considerations in contemporary China. Actively participating in global governance and rationally promoting state governance is the rational choice of contemporary China, which plays a unique and significant role in realizing the social transformation and national rejuvenation and modernization of contemporary China. Deepening state governance with the help of global governance and promoting global governance with the support of state governance is the basic idea and dimension of understanding and grasping the interaction, coordination and overall planning between the two. The restrictions and effects of global governance on state governance are mainly reflected in such considerations as objects, mechanisms, concepts and interests of governance, and modernization of state governance system and improvement of governance capacity can promote and deepen global governance in a more effective way.     

The Implications of State Governance for Effective Global Governance

Since the Third Plenary Session of the 18^th Central Committee of the CPC put forward the goal of modernizing the state governance system and state governance capacity, research on state governance theory and practice has taken off in the Chinese academic community. However, very little research has been undertaken on the relationship between state governance and global governance. In an interdependent world where domestic and international boundaries are becoming ever more blurred, state and global governance are not just mutually connected and consistent; they also influence and constrain each other. This paper looks into the influence of state governance on global governance in terms of the differences and internal linkages between state and global governance, arguing that enhancing governance capacity is an effective way for China to participate in global governance, promote the transformation of global governance system, wield its influence as a major power, and boost its right of discourse.     

The Influence of Global Governance upon State Governance*

The constant deepening of globalization is bringing all countries into the same global village, and intensified the coordination, interaction and mutual checks of global and state governance. Global governance advocates the whole of the interdependent destiny and common interests of mankind, and the extension of shared national responsibilities, challenges and risks to the whole globe instead of restricting them to certain regions or countries. Global governance is increasingly exerting a profound influence upon state governance in many respects, among them values, concepts, mechanisms, structures and actors, and is giving an external impetus to the modernization of state governance.     

网络经济与政府治理

20世纪 90年代以来 ,西方发达国家掀起了旨在构建适应网络经济的政府治理范式运动 ,以便提高国家的竞争力。目前 ,这场运动随着网络经济进程的加快而变得日益显著和强烈。本文着重分析了网络经济的特征以及网络经济对政府治理能力、治理理念、治理体制以及公共服务理念的挑战 ,目的是把握网络经济时代政府治理范式创新的大趋势 ,以便为完善我国行政改革理论和推行行政改革实践提供有益的启示和借鉴。     

社区建设与治理转型

从统治到治理的转型90年代以来,“治理”(governance)的概念和理论模型开始出现于西方政治学界(俞可平,2000:11),国内也有学者对其概念进行过专门阐释。治理是Governance的中文译义之一,除治理外,Governance还有统治、指示、控制、支配等译义,但只有治理与统治是同一译支。Governance、Government都来源     

"两山"理念的公共价值治理内涵与地方治理现代化

"两山"理念具有深刻的价值内涵,从公共价值治理视角来看,作为国家治理现代化的重要理念,其实质就是公共价值治理.具体可从三个方面理解:一是明确发展的"绿水青山"价值取向及"绿水青山就是金山银山"的公共价值创造,实现发展理念从工具理性到价值理性转变;二是协调不同发展理念及多元治理主体价值冲突,构建国家发展治理的伦理价值排序;三是促进多元治理主体的积极性和价值互动,激发政府等主体公共价值生产及创造能力等."两山"理念是国家治理理念现代化的一个重要标志,构成我国治理现代化的顶层指向,为地方治理现代化提供新的视野、路径及价值坐标.推动"两山"理念公共价值治理在地方的实践,需要确立"两山"理念作为地方治理的价值共识和公共价值创造目标;完善多元主体参与协商的治理格局,为"绿水青山"公共价值目标寻求广泛支持;建立能够推动"两山"理念公共价值创造的相关组织机构及运行机制等.     

State Governance,Global Governance and the Construction of World Order

State governance and global governance are two intertwining aspects in the construction of world order. A peaceful, prosperous and equitable world order encompasses internal order of sovereign states and international order of the international systems. Effective state governance nurtures internal order of sovereign states, eschews internal disorder, and prevents the spillover of negative externality into the international systems. In this sense, state governance is the cornerstone for constructing world order. In the meantime, effective global governance constructs world order and assists sovereign states in constructing internal order. In the construction of world order, different actors in the international systems represented by sovereign states inter alia must cooperate with a view to dissolving conflicts of interests and policies among states, managing global public domain, responding to common challenges and sharing responsibilities in assisting internally disordered states to govern effectively. Since the reform and opening up, China has contributed its distinctive part to the construction of world order by means of responsible state governance and global partnership governance.     

National Governance Quotient: The Foundation of Big Data-based National Governance

A nation’s rise or fall hinges, to some extent, upon its national governance quotient. National governance quotient, or NGQ, is a quantitative indicator measuring the governance level of a country in quotient form. Its value is the ratio of the national governance system and capacity to national governance costs, and its nature is that of an amalgam of national governance ideas and techniques quantified on the basis of the figures. It is advanced because its inner core lies in logic and computation, and it is scientific because it is guaranteed by technology platforms such as big data and cloud computing. The formulation of NGQ provides technical support and a basis for the transformation from experiential or experimental governance to quantitative, scientific governance, and it thus has great theoretical and practical significance for the modernization of national governance system and capacity. As well as being used to provide quantitative management of national governance modernization, NGQ can also be used as a measurement standard and key symbol for evaluating the modernization of China’s national governance by 2020. Furthermore, it can be used to compile a World NGQ Report with the aim of taking hold of international governance discourse, as well as to compile China local NGQ reports to improve local governance in China.