中国非自愿移民研究的回顾与分析——基于CSSCI（1998—2008）的研究

运用CSSCI数据库检索，得到1998至2008年间在中国非自愿移民研究领域111篇研究论文。通过对111篇文章从社会调查方法的使用情况、学科分类、基金论文数量、作者及作者机构、高频被引论文情况、研究热点主题六个方面进行分析．了解中国非自愿移民研究现状。     

编辑部声明

为适应中国信息化建设的需要,扩大作者学术交流渠道,本刊已被中国知网(CNKI)中国期刊全文数据库、台湾中文电子期刊服务资料库——思博网(CEPS)全文收录。作者投稿     

人口学核心期刊测定初试

<正> 人口学是一门刚刚兴起的学科,正在不断地发展和完善。在我国刊载人口学方面文章的期刊比较多,每年约有100种以上。那么,哪些期刊上刊载的人口学方面的文章较多、信息量较大、质量较高呢?这就需要在众多的期刊中,选择出一些核心的刊物,确定为核心期刊。人口学是一门独立学科。作为传播人口学的核心期刊,应有如下的特点:(1)能代表人口学领域较高的学术水平和学术价值;(2)能反映人口学学科的最新水平和发展趋势;(3)流通率和利用率较高,引文或文摘率多;(4)情报密度大,发表的文献较为重要;(5)刊物出版比较稳重,寿命比较长。     

人口学核心期刊(中文)

根据首都高校期刊研究会《中文核心期刊要目总览》课题组最近披露的初步研究结果,我国人口学核心期刊(中文)有17份。 该课题研究是从《全国报刊索引(哲社版)》(上海图书馆)、《中国社会科学文献题录》(中国社科院)和《人大复印报刊资料》(中国     

2016年《人口学刊》征订/征稿启事

<正>《人口学刊》是我国创办最早的人口学杂志之一,是面向国内外公开发行的国家级人口学专业期刊,已入选中国人文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊(南京大学)、中文核心期刊要目总览(北京大学)、中国人文社会科学核心期刊(中国社会科学院),是国家社科基金重点资助期刊,2013年、2015年中国国际影响力优秀学术期刊。《人口学刊》固定栏目有:人口与社会、人口流迁与城市化、人口老龄化与社会保障、劳动就业与人力资源开发、人口与资源环境、计划生育理论与实践、留守问题研究、国际人口研究等。作者投稿的文章研究目的要明确,观点鲜明,逻辑严谨,数据可靠,不能过     

欢迎订阅2022年《人口研究》

《人口研究》是教育部主管、中国人民大学主办、中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心(教育部人文社科百所重点研究基地、原人口研究所)承办的学术刊物,是人口学专业唯一被国家新闻出版总署选定的国家期刊方阵(双效)期刊、中国人口学会会刊、CSSCI来源期刊、全国中文核心期刊、中国科技核心期刊,是我国最早创办、国内外公开发行的综合性人口学专业杂志,在国内外具有广泛的影响。2012年入选国家社科基金学术期刊第一批资助名单。2012~2021年间共9次被《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社有限公司、中国学术文献国际评价研究中心、清华大学图书馆评为"中国最具国际影响力学术期刊",2014年被中国社会科学评价中心评为中国人文社会科学期刊社会学类顶级期刊。本刊旨在传播新的研究成果,介绍新的信息和分析方法,反映学术界和实际部门的新动态,为政府决策提供理论依据,为解决我国重大现实人口问题提供智库支持,为推动人口科学发展提供优质平台。     

欢迎订阅2022年《人口研究》

《人口研究》是教育部主管、中国人民大学主办、中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心(教育部人文社科百所重点研究基地、原人口研究所)承办的学术刊物,是人口学专业唯一被国家新闻出版总署选定的国家期刊方阵(双效)期刊、中国人口学会会刊、CSSCI来源期刊、全国中文核心期刊、中国科技核心期刊,是我国最早创办、国内外公开发行的综合性人口学专业杂志,在国内外具有广泛的影响。2012年入选国家社科基金学术期刊第一批资助名单。2012~2021年间共9次被《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社有限公司、中国学术文献国际评价研究中心、清华大学图书馆评为"中国最具国际影响力学术期刊",2014年被中国社会科学评价中心评为中国人文社会科学期刊社会学类顶级期刊。本刊旨在传播新的研究成果,介绍新的信息和分析方法,反映学术界和实际部门的新动态,为政府决策提供理论依据,为解决我国重大现实人口问题提供智库支持,为推动人口科学发展提供优质平台。     

近十年来中国农村养老服务的研究趋向与价值前瞻--基于Cite Space知识图谱的可视化分析北大核心CSSCI

不断完善农村养老服务体系,是打破老人“照顾赤字”的突破口。文章基于2011~2020年CSSCI(含扩展版)的文献数据,以Cite Space可视化软件为工具,对我国农村养老相关研究成果进行知识图谱分析。结果表明,近十年来中国农村养老研究经历了从繁荣到深化的发展历程。作者与研究机构的合作网络虽已具有影响力较高的作者和发文机构,但尚未形成相应的核心作者群,且研究机构之间、作者与研究机构之间的合作交流较为松散。同时,农村养老相关文献的来源期刊、涉及学科及基金分布折射出非均衡特征,多学科交叉研究将成为未来发展趋势。农村养老问题关键词的共现图谱呈现以“农村养老-养老模式-家庭养老-人口老龄化-农村养老服务”为主线的演进路径,“养老服务”“农村互助养老”和“乡村振兴”是近年来与农村养老问题研究相匹配的热词。因此,后续关于农村养老问题的研究应围绕应对人口老龄化趋势、不断完善社会保障体系以及持续提升养老服务水平和质量等方面而展开。     

2020年《人口学刊》征订/征稿启事

<正>《人口学刊》是我国创办最早的人口学杂志之一,是面向国内外公开发行的国家级人口学专业期刊,已入选中国人文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊(南京大学)、中文核心期刊要目总览(北京大学)、中国人文社会科学核心期刊(中国社会科学院),是国家社科基金重点资助期刊,2015-2018年国际影响力优秀学术期刊。《人口学刊》固定栏目有:人口与社会、人口流迁与城市化、人口老龄化与社会保障、劳动就业与人力资源开发、人口与资源环境、计划生育理论与实践、留守问题研究、国际人口研究等。作者投稿的文章研究目的要明确,观点鲜明,逻辑严谨,数据可靠,不能过     

《人口研究》荣获“2012中国最具国际影响力学术期刊”称号

2012年12月26日,中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社、清华大学图书馆、中国科学文献计量评价研究中心联合举办的《中国学术期刊影响因子年报&国际引证报告(2012)》暨"2012中国最具国际影响力学术期刊"发布会在京举行。这是我国首次全面评价国内学术期刊的国际影响力。《人口研究》从全国1492种人文社科类期刊中脱颖而出,荣获"2012中国最具国际影响力学术期刊"。这是国内人口学界唯一入选的学术期刊。     

Improving the quality of life: Prescriptions for change

The main points made in the previous papers are summarized and integrated and the strategies that the authors have recommended for producing an improved QOL are discussed. QOL is also systematically reviewed in relation to matters of definition, assessment, applications, and directions for future research and practice.     

Projections of households and household populations by household size propensities

This paper describes a method for constructing projections of numbers of households of various types and the numbers of people in that structure. The method uses the concept ofhousehold size propensity, that is the probability that a person of given age and sex resides in a household of sizea, c, wherea is the number of adults per household andc is number of children per household. Using data from the 1981 and 1986 Censuses and population projections to the year 2011, the method produces projections of Australian households and household populations by size of household for five-year intervals from 1991 to 2011. The research reported in this paper arose out of the University of Melbourne’s research program to study the structure, economics and technology of households. This research began in 1986 at the Centre for Applied Research on the Future in the Department of Architecture and Building and from 1991 has been continued by the Households Research Unit in the Department of Economics. Reports of this work are contained in the collection of essaysHouseholds Work edited by Ironmonger (1989) and in discussion papers issued by the Centre for Applied Research on the Future by Ironmonger (1987), Jennings (1989) Sonius (1989) and Ironmonger and Richardson (1991). The authors wish to thank Roger Jones of the Social Sciences Data Archive for running some cross tabulations on the 1981 Census one per cent sample tape, Vic Jennings of the Households Research Unit for his valuable contributions in a number of discussions, and the referees to thisJournal for numerous helpful suggestions.     

Thirty Years of Demography

In this paper, we present a content analysis of Demography, the official journal of the Population Association of America. Our results reflect patterns of change and stability in a number of areas, including: subjects covered, number of authors, gender of authors, type of data used, source of data used, affiliation of authors and statistical procedures employed. The data suggest that the field of population research has become increasingly bureaucratized and complex, while at the same time continuing to focus on familiar research subjects. A relatively small number of population research centers contribute disproportionately to the journal.     

Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors

On the basis of some assumptions (e.g. Minimum and Maximum Contribution Scores of authors) a simple equation is introduced for calculating individual contribution scores of co-authors of multi-authored papers. The calculated Corrected Contribution Scores are in good agreement with the data obtained empirically, earlier. It is suggested that individual percentage contributions should be declared by the co-authors in the by-line of papers.     

35 Jahre ?ZS �� Eine quantitative Bestandsaufnahme

In this paper I provide an empirically based quantitative analysis of the last 35 years of the Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie (ÖZS). I ask if the shape of articles have changed, which patterns of co-authorship can be found, and what conclusions are to be drawn regarding to a cultural change within the sociology in Austria. The basis for the empirical analysis is a dataset of all original papers published between 1976 and 2010. The investigated variables are the institutional affiliation of the authors, article length, number of authors per article, the proportion of women, percentage of non-Austrian contributions, and the topics covered. The data suggests that articles reflect the increasing professionalism and academisation of sociology in Austria. Furthermore it shows that articles in the ÖZS are increasingly written by more than one author. It turns out that there are a few people to be particularly attractive as co-authors and therefore get key positions within the publication network.     

Bringing the state in: A commentary on welfare states and social inequality

A long and extensive line of welfare state research reveals that the state is both a cause and consequence of social stratification. However, the findings of this research have largely been ignored in the literature on social stratification and mobility. Similarly, welfare state scholars largely work without reference to the research on social stratification and mobility. The papers presented in the volume are an important first step towards integrating the literatures these complementary literatures. In this commentary, I push these articles further by revealing linkages between the papers that are not fully developed in papers themselves. In particular, I highlight two ways in which the papers in this issue can be productively linked to raise new questions or provide new insight into old problems. I then discuss the reasons why and productive ways in which these two large and stand-alone literatures can be integrated. I end the commentary with a section describing productive avenues for future research that integrates both literatures.     

Count data models for demographic data∗

Key demographic variables, such as the number of children and the number of marriages or divorces, can only take integer values. This papers deals with the estimation of single equation models in which the counts are regressed on a set of observed individual characteristics such as age, gender, or nationality. Most empirical work in population economics has neglected the fact that the dependent variable is a nonnegative integer. In the few cases where this feature was recognized, the authors advocated the use of the Poisson regression model. The Poisson model imposes, however, the equality of conditional mean and variance, a restriction which is often rejected by the data. We propose a generalized event count model to simultaneously allow for a wide class of count data models and account for over‐ and underdispersion. This model is successfully applied to German data on fertility, divorces and mobility.     

民族人口研究的进展

本文对十一五期间民族人口研究的论文进行了梳理与归纳。认为目前中国民族人口的研究现状是:对各民族的人口状况基本清楚,研究能紧密联系实际,研究队伍较强和研究内容广泛,学科不断进步,同时也存在基础研究薄弱,高质量的成果较少的问题。     

Biosocial models of demographic behavior: An introduction

A workshop on biosocial models of demographic behavior was organized to provide information to members of the Social Sciences and Population Study Section (SSP), the group entrusted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the responsibility for conducting the first level of peer review of demographic applications submitted to NIH for possible funding. Some of the variables studies by demographers are biological, e.g., fertility, fecundity, morbidity, and mortality, so demographers are not unaware of biological variables. However, they tend to treat biological variables as something to be explained by social, economic, and psychological factors rather than to be integrated into an explanatory paradigm. This workshop contains papers that focus upon various stages of the life cycle and explore the importance of biosocial variables in explaining selected aspects of human behavior.This introduction presents an overview of the topics covered by the authors of the papers presented and the workshop, and is based upon opening remarks at the DRG Workshop on Biosocial Models of Demographic Behavior, Bethesda, MD, 12 October 1994.     

Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated

This paper contributes to the debate on high-skilled migration byexamining whether the foreign-born and foreign-educated are disproportionatelyrepresented among individuals making exceptional contributions to science and engineering (S & E) in the U.S. Six indicators of scientific achievement areused: individuals elected to the National Academy of Sciences and/or National Academy of Engineering, authors of citation classics, authors of hot papers, the 250 most-cited authors, authors of highly cited patents, and scientistswho have played a key role in launching biotechnology firms. We do not claim that this list is exhaustive, merely illustrative. Using a variety of sources, we are able to determine the birth andeducational origin of 89.3% of the study group of over 4,500 scientists and engineers. For each indicator of scientific achievement, we test to see if the observed frequency by birth (or educational) origin is significantly differentfrom the frequency one would expect given the composition of the scientific labor force in the U.S. We find that although there is some variation by discipline, individuals making exceptional contributions to S & E in the U.S. aredisproportionately drawn from the foreign born. Only in the instance of hot papers in the life sciences were we unable to reject the null hypothesis that the proportion is the same as that in the underlying population. The most frequent country of origin in the life sciences is Great Britain followed by Germany. In the physical sciences the reverse is true. We also find that individuals making exceptional contributions are, in many instances, disproportionately foreign educated, both at the undergraduate and at the graduate level. We conclude that immigrants have been a source of strength and vitalityfor U.S. science and, on balance, the U.S. appears to have benefited from the educational investments made by other countries. We do not investigate, however, whether U.S. scientists and engineers have borne part of thecost of the inflow of foreign talent by being displaced from jobs and/or earning lower wages. Nor do we investigate the cost to the countries of origin.