共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
2.
非洲国家智库兴起于19世纪末殖民地时期,经历了初创期、勃兴期、调整期和转型期四个发展阶段.由于依赖西方资金援助、深受西方思想影响,加之易受国内政局变化影响、智库与政府间缺乏政策制定与人员的互动以及非洲智库对自身定位不清等原因,非洲国家智库对本国政府和社会的影响力受到制约.近年来,发展迅猛的非洲国家智库除了聚焦本国发展议题外,还注重区域政策网络的建设.随着非洲国家智库自主性意识的增强,其合作伙伴和研究议题都呈现出"向东看"的趋势.中国应抓住契机,进一步助推非洲国家夯实智库的机制建设和能力建设,帮助其增强对本国和本地区政策的参与度,提升对非洲舆论和公众的影响力,塑造多样化和理性化的中非关系国际话语. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
土耳其是最早建立智库的中东国家之一,智库对土耳其内政外交的影响日益显著。本文追溯了土耳其智库的发展演变,对土耳其现有的智库做了基本分类,并在此基础上分析了土耳其智库的特点,以及对土耳其外交政策和中土关系的影响。值得注意的是,土耳其智库在2000年以后发展迅速,在国内政治的影响下,智库在与政府的关系、意识形态和人力资源等方面形成了自身的特点,但也存在不少问题。本文认为,当前"一带一路"倡议使中国与沿线国家的双边关系加深,促进了中土两国的智库交流,为中土之间的互信、合作增添了新渠道。但与此同时,应加强对土耳其极端民族主义智库活动和动向的关注,以切实保障中土在"一带一路"框架下务实合作的成果。 相似文献
7.
8.
当代伊朗智库兴起于1979年伊斯兰革命后。在数量上,伊朗智库位列西亚北非地区国家之首。在类型上,伊朗智库主要分为政府型智库、高校智库和独立智库,这些智库对伊朗政府决策的影响力正日益上升,其中政府型智库主导着当代伊朗智库的发展。当前,中伊双方尚未建立起双边智库合作的常态化机制。因此,加强中国和伊朗智库间的合作与交流,有利于深化中伊战略合作的内涵。本文从伊朗智库的历史生成、现状及其特点、对伊朗外交政策的影响以及中伊两国智库间的合作与交流等方面进行探讨。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
《Journal of Community Practice》2013,21(3):89-106
Abstract University-community partnerships are receiving increased attention in an era of rapid change and fragmented resources. This case study of a multi-county consortium of social service agencies in collaboration with four graduate social work programs and two foundations represents an innovative approach to building a partnership through the use of a consortium as a mediating structure. With a focus on training, research, policy development, and a think tank, specific implications for developing agency-university partnership are identified. The case is embedded in the expanding literature on university-community collaboration. 相似文献
12.
Struyk Raymond J. 《Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations》2000,11(3):277-289
Think tanks in the former Soviet bloc face the stark challenge of sustainability. To survive and prosper, they have to be increasingly entrepreneurial and business-like and have to actively seek contracts from government and the international donor community. In this context, this paper discusses the diversification strategies of four think tanks identified to be particularly entrepreneurial in developing new lines of work. This includes commercial activities similar to those of consulting firms, and tapping the business community for donations by offering seminars or other products. The paper reviews how these institutions identified and assessed various opportunities, and how they promoted a new line of work. It also explores the rewards—financial and other—and the challenges that are created by the new types of work within the organizations. 相似文献
13.
Eric Bonds 《Sociology Compass》2016,10(4):306-317
Sociologists have done important research documenting the key role that think tanks play in the climate change denialism movement in the United States, which has sought to mislead the American public about the realities of global warming. Sociologists have not, however, assessed the full range of ways that think tanks are responding to – or planning for – global environmental change. This article proposes a typology of elite responses to global warming, which goes beyond denialism to include (i) limited climate mitigation, (ii) climate adaptation/privileged accommodation, and (iii) climate opportunism. Ultimately, this article provides insights on ways to build upon previous research in both environmental and political sociology to study the interface between elite‐driven policy, climate change, and capitalism. 相似文献
14.
John McLevey 《Revue canadienne de sociologie》2014,51(1):54-75
Les relations entre les centres de recherche ou groupes de réflexion et leurs bailleurs de fonds sont importantes dans les théories et les discours publics abordant la question de l'orientation politique de la recherche sur les politiques publiques. Pourtant, très peu d'études examinent systématiquement ces relations à travers un ensemble de cas. Cet article, avec des méthodes comparatives et relationnelles, teste les théories élitiste, pluraliste et de terrain, en analysant des données portant sur le financement et l'orientation politique de 30 groupes de réflexion de 2000 à 2011. Les résultats démontrent que les dons provenant de l'étranger contribuent à soutenir certains groupes de réflexions conservateurs, mais ce financement demeure tout de même marginal dans l'ensemble. Au niveau national, les groupes de réflexion sont financés de manière contrastée: les groupes conservateurs sont financés principalement par des donateurs privés, alors que les groupes de réflexion centristes sont financés principalement par l'état. Depuis 2005, les liens entre l'ensemble des groupes de réflexion conservateurs, financés par des donateurs privés, sont devenus plus serrés. En revanche, les liens entre l'ensemble des groupes de réflexion centristes se sont relâchés et leur financement dépend de plus en plus de leurs propres revenus et des intérêts de leurs investissements. Ces résultats laissent planer un certain doute sur les prédictions qui découlent des théories élitiste et pluraliste et confirment en partie les suppositions de la théorie de terrain. The relationships between think tanks and their funders are central to theory and public discourse about the politics of policy knowledge, yet very little research systematically examines these relationships across cases. This article evaluates elite, pluralist, and field theories by analyzing original data on funding and politics for 30 think tanks from 2000 to 2011 with comparative and relational methods. I find that foreign donations help support some conservative think tanks, but that it is a small amount of money relative to other funding sources. Domestically, think tank funding is structured by an opposition between donor‐funded conservatives and state‐funded centrists. Since 2005, the cluster of conservative think tanks funded by private donors has become tighter, while the cluster of think tanks supported by the state has become looser and more reliant on self‐generated revenue and interest and investments. These findings cast doubt on predictions derived from elite and pluralist theories, and offer some support for field theory. 相似文献
15.
知识城市是中国城市发展模式的创新。在全球化和信息化时代,我国知识城市发展要规避西方发达国家城市发展的老路,优先发展信息与通信技术(ICT),依靠公民知识素质的提升和企业知识积累实现跨越式发展,并不断扩大其作为通用技术的优势,推动城市的知识扩散、知识创新和产业创新,使其成为中国构建知识城市的动力。 相似文献
16.
Thomas Medvetz 《Qualitative sociology》2010,33(4):549-562
This research note uses in-depth interviews, ethnographic observations, and archival records to examine the self-understandings
of think tank-affiliated policy experts. I argue that policy experts draw on a series of idioms—those of the academic scholar,
the political aide, the entrepreneur, and the media specialist—to construct a unique albeit synthetic professional identity.
The essence of the policy expert’s role lies in a continuous effort to balance and reconcile the contradictory imperatives
associated with these idioms. An analysis of the policy expert’s mixed “professional psyche” offers a useful point of entry
into the objective social structure of the think tank. 相似文献
17.
“知识城市”的理论构建与发展 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
知识城市是知识经济的产物和城市转型的客观需要,知识城市作为一种全新的城市可持续发展理念已经进入国际城市发展的视野。“知识城市”作为一种发展战略,有其一套硬性的衡量指标。知识城市建设涉及到城市生活的诸多方面,因此发展知识城市必须得到整个社会的支持。 相似文献
18.
知识城市是21世纪城市可持续发展的一种全新理念。知识经济时代的到来引发对知识城市以及知识资本的研究,知识资本的管理以及知识城市的塑造将是未来城市发展的重要问题。本文主要研究知识资本的概念范畴以及管理城市知识资本的框架,借鉴并扩展了知识资夯导航系统以及CICBS模型,为我国未来知识城市的构建提供参考。 相似文献
19.
知识城市建设与文化产业发展 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
“知识城市”建设是当前城市发展的新理念。本文针对这一概念进行分析,提出“知识城市”追求城市发展的共性,同时还应为城市发展提供特色与差异的个性·9而文化产业在这一进程中会发挥重要作用,将从产业结构、城市形象、市民生活等方面对“知识城市”建设与城市文化品格塑造进行整合。 相似文献
20.
In a context in which community empowerment isvirtually government policy, it is hardly surprising that thereis almost no area of social policy that is immune from the communitytreatment. Of course, this is not new, despite the zeal withwhich each new initiative is rolled out. In fact,sometimes it seems that policy development needs to reinventthe wheel of community every decade or so. The question, therefore,is what this ideological recycling of community tells us: first,about the meaning of the term itself; second, about its contemporarysignificance within the wider politics of the state. This articleargues that we need to draw on those historical and theoreticalresources which help us to think our way through to the contemporarycontext. Only an active and engaged recognition of the politicsof community will enable us to get to the root of the problematicyet promising nature of community development. 相似文献