论阮籍、嵇康的隐逸诗

魏末阮籍、嵇康处于全身远害的忧患心理状态之下,在诗歌中大量抒发了渴望隐逸的思想感情,因此,表现出由忧患避世到企慕隐逸的思想发展轨迹。但由于他们企慕隐逸此时只是存在于思想层面,诗人并未真正归隐山林,因此以隐逸缘由叙述与希企隐逸的志向表述为主要结构模式,由于性格、观念的不同,他们的隐逸诗中意象、情感也分别表现出不同的特征。     

鲁迅立人思想的一个侧面──再论《补天》

本文从鲁迅的＂立人＂思想这一角度,阐述《补天》（《不周山》）的思想内蕴,指出《补天》张扬＂新的生命＂意识、弘扬人道主义精神的主题是鲁迅＂立人＂思想的一个侧面,与《狂人日记》、《阿Ｑ正传》等作品形成了思想上、艺术上的互补。因此,《补天》是鲁迅早期的主要作品之一。     

姜夔与陆龟蒙诗歌师承关系辨析

南宋姜夔的诗歌向被认为是初学江西诗派黄庭坚,后学晚唐诗人陆电蒙。但此说由于证据不足值得质疑,首先姜夔的《自述》、《自序》、《诗说》均未言及学陆龟蒙诗,至于其同期好友杨万里赞其“甚似陆天随”只是杨个人的好恶;其次,姜夔是以“自然高妙”的诗歌理论和审美理想支撑其后期诗风的;再次,姜夔称道陆龟蒙或与陆诗风格相近主要是他们间相同的品格和相近的人生经历所致,这是与当时的时代风气、地理环境、人格精神等因素分不开的。     

“鲁迅形象”建构的文化语境、过程与反思

"鲁迅形象"是中国现代文化史上典型的现代知识分子的形象符码,其生成过程与现代中国的动态语境密切相关,深刻地勾联了阐释者的文化心理和思维形态。"鲁迅形象"是由自塑和他塑合力而构成的公共形象,对其进行文化学意义上的考察可为探索现代中国发展的社会史和现代知识分子的心灵史提供理论资源。     

钱理群新世纪十年鲁迅研究述评

在退休后的近十年中,钱理群对"社会的鲁迅"与"真的知识阶级"有了更多的认识,并将其作为阐释重点。同时,他一如既往地坚持启蒙主义与民间立场,"沉入于国民"中,传播普及鲁迅精神。由于启蒙主义本身的局限与特殊时代背景的限制,钱理群的启蒙工作注定收效甚微。然而,其启蒙行为本身就具有重大意义。     

鲁迅对台静农的影响

台静农是二十世纪二十年代享有盛名的乡土作家。其乡土小说中展现了为人生的文学观、以场景展示为主的叙事技巧、对故乡乡土民俗风情的生动描写,具有独特的悲剧色彩,这些都深受鲁迅先生影响。台静农是深受鲁迅影响同时又有着自己鲜明特色的地之子。     

“我今仅守诗书业,汝勿轻捐少壮时”——论陆游的家庭诗教

在中华民族的文化传承里,＂诗教＂始终占据着第一把交椅的位置。这不仅因为我们是一个诗的国度,而且诗在政治、经济、军事、外交等活动中,都是十分重要的工具。无诗,无以立。因此,士大夫家庭都将＂诗教＂作为家庭教育的首选。陆游即是一个很典型的例证。     

鲁国古泮池遗址今何在——基于文献学角度的考察

据《水经注》等古文献记载:鲁泮池、泮台与汉太子钓鱼池、太子钓鱼台同在鲁故城西南部,地理位置相近,但却分属于不同的古建筑群遗址,形状也尽不相同。明中期衍圣公孔弘绪与孔弘泰分别在太子钓鱼池遗址和古泮池遗址上修建有南池别墅(又名南溪)和东庄别墅(又名东池)。明正德、嘉靖年间"移城护庙",新建阙里城东墙恰好从太子钓鱼池和古泮池中间穿过。太子钓鱼池留在了明城内,古泮池则被隔在了明城外。清乾隆年间,在明城内太子钓鱼池遗址上修建"古泮池行宫",乾隆帝"古泮池证疑"将其地定为古泮池。由此古泮池与太子钓鱼池张冠李戴,明城外真正的古泮池遗址再也无人问津。     

一个多民族文学融合互动的范本——《述善集》文学文献价值考述

“Tangwu” is an alternative name for the descendants of the Xixia dynasty. In 1227 AD, a number of these Xixia descendants moved inland after the destruction of the Xixia Dynasty by the Mongolians. One group of them migrated to the area near Puyang, Henan Province. Tangwu Chongxi ( Yang Chongxi ) of the Yuan Dynasty compiled the Shu San Ji, which is divided into three volumes: Shansu, Yucai and Xingshi, and appended with the biography of Boyan Zongdao. It reflects the historical origins, social class, living conditions and the relations with the Han people of the descendants of the Dangxiangqiang minority af-ter they moved to Puyang. This book attracted a lot of attention in academic circles, and it was there-fore reorganized and published in 1985 after being treasured by the people for more than 600 years. It has high academic value for its comprehensive his-torical records. We can not only acquaint ourselves with the history of the make-up of the Chinese na-tion, but also research this diversity from multiple perspectives, such as history, nationality and folk-lore . That is why it has drawn so much attention a-mong academic researchers. The book contains po-ems, prose and biographies, which belong to dif-ferent celebrated scholars from different ethnic mi-norities, all of whom had relationships with Tang-wu Chongxi. It is also a typical model of Qiang-Han literature, which is very rare. This paper gives a preliminary exploration on the book, and shows a small part of its comprehensive value. Shu San Ji is not a merely personal collec-tion, but is also different from general literature collections. The compilation of the book took a long time. Shu San Ji Xuxie ( Continuation of Shu San Ji) , written by Zhang Yining, was finished in the 18 th year of the Zhizheng Period in the Yuan Dynasty (1358), which indicates that the Shu San Ji had already been finished by that time . Zeng wuwei chushi yangxiangxian xu ( Presented to Chu Shi Yang Xingxian·Preface ) , written by Wei Su and finished in the 24 th year of Zhizheng ( 1364 ) , suggests that the Shu San Ji had been compiled in-to a book by that time, and that it was compiled with the compositions of social celebrities of the time. However, the Shu San Ji, as it has been handed down to us today, includes the Song Yang-gong Xiangxian gui Tanyuan xu ( Preface of Send-ing Yanggong Xiangxian Back to Tanyuan) by Tao Kai, written in March in the 5 th year of Hongwu in the Ming Dynasty ( 1372 ) . It indicates that Yang Xiangxian kept on collecting articles even after the book was finished. The Xu yangshi yiji ( Preface of Yang’s Last Collection) by Wang Chongqing, writ-ten in the 6th year of Jiajing (1527), indicates that the Shu San Ji was still being written after Yang Chongxi’s death. At the end of the Shu San Ji , Boyang Zongdao zhuan ( Biography of Boyang Zongdao) and Weiti shi (Poems) were collected in the 16 th year of Zhengde in the Ming Dynasty (1529) and in the 16th year of Shunzhi in the Qing Dynasty (1629), respectively. It suggests that the
Shu San Ji had been supplemented and continually recompiled since Yang Chongxi firstly finished his book in 1358. After 271 years, in 1629, the Shu San Ji, as we read it today, was finally comple-ted. Through the basic components of the Shu San Ji,readers can understand that the Tangwu family was a harmonious, multi-ethnic family. A number of multi-ethnic writers spent long periods compos-ing works collected in the Shu San Ji and Tangwu Chongxi was also influenced by China’s diverse culture and traditional Confucian culture. The work is strongly connected with his study in Guozixue. In the late Yuan Dynasty, the restora-tion of the imperial examinations promoted Confucianism’s influence further. Pan Di, as Tang-wu Chongxi’s teacher in Guozixue, wrote most arti-cles in the Shu San Ji, which shows their close re-lationship and his influences on Tangwu Chongxi’s literature and Confucian studies. Tangwu Chongxi and others’ works reflected their sense of admira-tion for and deep feelings for their Dangxiang an-cestors, but more so helped to propagate the con-cepts of Confucian edification, diligence, thrifti-ness and benevolence, and some of them did so in a very polemic way. For example, Boyan Zongdao wrote the Jiefu xu ( preface of “Jiefu”) and Tang-wu Chongxi wrote the Jiefu houxu ( epilogue of“Jiefu”) , which reflect the social reality and ide-ology of all scholars with different ethnic back-grounds at that time. His work, “Tangwu gong-bei” fushi ( Poem inscribed on Tangwu Tablet ) , was written in a plain and authentic way and showed that he always remembered his origins and his ethnic desire to inherit the family’s heritage. Meanwhile , it was also mixed with the popular ide-as of upholding the honor of their ancestors from the central plains and Han areas, which shows the
editorial purpose of the Shu San Ji and also dem-onstrates the value of Chinese multi-ethnic litera-ture and cultural integration.     

时空的突破:文化折叠现象中的鲁迅

20世纪初以来,中西文化的交流碰撞,造就了中国现代文化意识多层次的沉积地带,产生了多种文化因素交融的折叠现象,造就了新的语境和文化态势,鲁迅的思想就体现了一种多元化文化意识因素相融合的结果,突破了传统文化的界线,为中国文化及其文学的发展拓展了空间。