从"苏丹红"案看惩罚性赔偿与责任竞合

通过分析全国首例“苏丹红”案所涉惩罚性赔偿的适用及责任竞合问题,认为惩罚性赔偿责任的构成要件为经营者提供商品、服务时有欺诈行为及消费者受有损失。法律应就经营者的欺诈行为作出举证责任倒置的规定。消费者要求经营者承担惩罚性赔偿责任的基础关系为合同关系。“苏丹红”案中,原告诉请涉及侵权责任与违约责任竞合问题。责任竞合时,权利人最迟应在一审开庭前作出选择,如果不作选择或者放弃选择权,应由法院依据有利于维护权利人权益的原则,作出适用违约责任或侵权责任形式的判决。     

抗战时期中国文学的雅俗互融－－兼论张恨水、张爱玲、赵树理

中国现代文学史的编写,多年来存在着一个致命的弱点,就是缺乏对通俗文学的重视.实际上,在抗战时期,处在不同政治地域内最有影响的代表作家张恨水、张爱玲、赵树理的创作均已表现出雅俗互融的风格.但由于他们的出身、生活经历和文化底蕴不同,因此表现出了各自不同的特点.     

网络文学研究的学科间性

20世纪90年代以来,中国的网络文学研究在文学与网络、泛文化与纯文学等研究语境的争论中漂移无根。本文综述了当下网络文学研究的定位,认为网络文学研究应该避开纯文学之争,在学科间性中研究其文学和文化因素。     

中国现代报纸文艺副刊的学院派文化特色概述

富有学术气象、文化意味、学院气息是中国现代报纸文艺副刊的一个重要特色。在中国现代报纸副刊的出版过程中,学院派知识分子的执掌、大学学生的积极参与成就了它们的学院派文化特色。对学术活动的关注和对学术思想的启蒙则体现了中国现代报纸文艺副刊对学术繁荣所作的贡献。     

中央文献排比修辞的俄译策略研究——以十九大报告及其俄译本为例

中央文献排比修辞的频繁使用起到了增强语势、突出重点、使句式结构条理清晰的作用。本文以十九大报告及其俄译本为例,尝试基于译文与俄罗斯媒体中新闻报道的对比结果对排比修辞的俄译策略进行统计分析,提出“提取公因式,合并同类项”“舍弃复现结构,按照原文原意分别译出”“保留复现结构,遵照原文形式依次译出”“改变复现结构,转换复现词词性”以及解释性翻译等五种符合目的语表达习惯的俄译策略,以期对中央文献俄译研究以及中国对外话语体系的建设提供参考与借鉴。     

六朝文学研究的趋向——以三部古籍为中心

最近二十年,中国内地学者对六朝文学的关心主要集中在南朝。这是因为受文学观念和意识形态的影响,很长一段时间里,学界对南朝文学的评价过低,导致对它的研究不足。六朝文学研究的近况,从新近出版的三部新整理的古籍可见一斑,它们是《金楼子校笺》《玉台新咏汇校》《文镜秘府论汇校汇考》。它们都算是南朝文学研究的基本文献,其整理一方面仰赖于相关的研究积累,另一方面也必然会推动相关研究领域的深化,因此有着一定的代表性。     

校本课程“教育文艺”教学改革刍议——《红楼梦》大观园题咏的教育启示

大观园题咏是贾政主导众清客协力配合对贾宝玉实施的一次成功的教育实验。它给予我们“教育文艺”校本课程的启示是多方面的：教学内容体系建构上要丰富多彩，更加注重应用性；教学方法手段上要多样化，尤其重在启发参与；教学考核评价上要多元开放，注重过程和实践。     

Consumer trust repair: A critical literature review

Consumers are fundamental to organisational functioning and survival. Their loyalty, commitment, product acceptance and good long-term relationships with firms and brands are underpinned by their trust. Unfortunately, over the last decade or so, we have witnessed some of the more spectacular violations of consumer trust in the history of business. This has led to negative consequences, such as loss of competitive advantage, rage, lack of commitment and decrease in turnover. Consequently, study of trust repair has become an important theoretical concern for a growing number of trust scholars. This article reviews and synthesises existing theory and research on the topic. It first sketches general characteristics of the consumer trust repair literature, including its meta-theoretical underpinning. It then identifies specific strategies associated with consumer trust repair and synthesises them into five categories of trust repair strategies. In addition, this paper highlights theoretical processes that explain why/how trust repair strategies work. Third, the paper proposes six fruitful avenues for future research. This study contributes to the field of consumer trust repair research by critically reviewing and synthesising emerging theory and research on strategies associated with consumer trust repair, by showing why and how these strategies work and by identifying most fruitful research areas.     

从俞平伯晚年自省和“李希凡自述”想到的(之三)——回应俞平伯晚年的红学研究反思

俞平伯先生晚年的红学自省是真实可信的,应引起红学界高度重视,他的红学研究思想的重大变化同1954年那场对他的批评有内在的因果关系。对当年那场"批俞评红"不能全盘否定,不能只讲负面问题,全面否定其正确性和必要性。现在红学研究的一些乱象正是当年批判过了的错误研究思想、研究方法的泛滥。这种泛滥同对当年的全盘否定不无关系。     

Communicating Conservation Status: How Different Statistical Assessment Criteria Affect Perceptions of Extinction Risk

Although alternative forms of statistical and verbal information are routinely used to convey species’ extinction risk to policymakers and the public, little is known about their effects on audience information processing and risk perceptions. To address this gap in literature, we report on an experiment that was designed to explore how perceptions of extinction risk differ as a function of five different assessment benchmarks (Criteria A–E) used by scientists to classify species within IUCN Red List risk levels (e.g., Critically Endangered, Vulnerable), as well as the role of key individual differences in these effects (e.g., rational and experiential thinking styles, environmental concern). Despite their normative equivalence within the IUCN classification system, results revealed divergent effects of specific assessment criteria: on average, describing extinction risk in terms of proportional population decline over time (Criterion A) and number of remaining individuals (Criterion D) evoked the highest level of perceived risk, whereas the single‐event probability of a species becoming extinct (Criterion E) engendered the least perceived risk. Furthermore, participants scoring high in rationality (analytic thinking) were less prone to exhibit these biases compared to those low in rationality. Our findings suggest that despite their equivalence in the eyes of scientific experts, IUCN criteria are indeed capable of engendering different levels of risk perception among lay audiences, effects that carry direct and important implications for those tasked with communicating about conservation status to diverse publics.