审判委员会制度的理论架构

对审委会制度的改革,有人主张废除审委会制度为其核心内容;也有人主张目前应在保留的基础上予以改革和完善。废改之争,焦点是研究方法之争。主废和主改各有其弊,应通过立法程序按照“不审不判”的思路重塑审委会制度,明确审委会审判组织的地位,赋予其合议、陪审、咨询、调研四大职能及案件实体决定权和指导权,并建立和完善相应的程序。     

信息智能中介检索的应用研究

就信息智能中介检索的基本概念、模式结构、有效的智能中介检索以及中介检索服务的可适应性等的相关问题进行了较为详细地介绍、分析和研究.同时,还就信息智能中介检索的松弛查询方法及其应用进行了探讨.     

不宜废除法院主动启动刑事再审

学术界有人主张废除法院主动启动刑事再审,这有悖于我国的文化传统,不利于高效地实现公正。对因审判行为不当导致的生效裁判错误,法院主动启动刑事再审纠错,应当视为一审、二审之诉效力的延伸与补救,是对诉权的监护,合于司法原理,独具特色而又科学。     

蒋介石访印与克里浦斯调查团

蒋介石在1942年访问了印度,他企图通过调解英印关系实现其支持中国抗战的目的,结果调停失败。与此同时,英国政府也意识到英印关系的重要性,派克里浦斯出访印度与各派协商谈判,最后仍以失败告终。     

美国联邦法院管辖的跨州管辖权案件研究

跨州问题管辖权案件联邦法院受理案件的基本类型,就跨州管辖权而言,存在完全的跨州管辖权理论和最低限度的跨州管辖权理论,跨州管辖权案件主要考虑当事人的不同州籍和诉讼金额的大小,在如何确定当事人的州籍和诉讼金额上存在不同的理论。     

数字经济的减贫效应研究

利用中国2011-2018年省份数据,构建面板回归模型和多重中介模型探讨数字经济的减贫效应及影响机理.研究发现:数字经济与农村贫困发生率存在显著负向关系,在考虑城镇化、经济增长等影响贫困因素的基础上,减贫效应依旧显著;数字经济的收入增长效应和收入分配效应显著,即数字经济可通过促进家庭增收和弱化收入差距的渠道影响贫困,但数据资源配置不均带来的数字鸿沟可能会扩大城乡收入差距,加大相对贫困的治理难度.     

论仲调结合在“一带一路”商事纠纷解决中的运用

根据“一带一路”商事纠纷的显著特征,其解纷机制应满足形式灵活多元、合意性较强、跨国执行便利、专业水平高等需求。仲调结合作为一种复合型纠纷解决方式,与诉讼、商事仲裁、商事调解相比所具有的优势更能满足以上需求。目前,仲调结合主要存在“先调解后仲裁”与“先仲裁后调解”两种实践模式。为了优化仲调结合在“一带一路”商事纠纷解决中的运用,应丰富仲调结合形式与设置具体操作规则,加强仲调结合组织建设与解纷人才培育,充分赋予当事人选择权以克服程序质疑,健全错误仲调结合结果的救济机制,订立多边条约与承认互惠关系以优化跨国执行等。     

Tolerance of Uncertainty: Links to Happenstance,Career Decision Self‐Efficacy,and Career Satisfaction

This study investigated the extent to which tolerance of uncertainty affects the relationship between happenstance skills and career satisfaction via career decision self‐efficacy. Moderated mediation analysis was conducted on data collected from 321 graduates (175 men, 146 women) of Korean universities making the school‐to‐work transition. Results showed that career decision self‐efficacy fully mediated the relationship between happenstance skills and career satisfaction. Furthermore, the moderation effect of tolerance of uncertainty had a significant impact on the relationship between happenstance skills and career decision self‐efficacy. Tolerance of uncertainty should be considered an important variable in happenstance career theory and intervention. Unplanned influences should also be considered important factors in the career decision‐making process.     

中国古代调解制度探析

古代社会解决纠纷的途径多种多样,调解作为其中一种主要方式有着举足轻重的作用。在介绍中国传统调解制度的类型及特点的基础上,探讨传统调解制度对于古代封建社会的价值所在,认为其虽然存在一定的缺点,但是其有益的部分对我国当前的纠纷解决机制的完善有很大的借鉴作用。     

Examining implementation and preliminary performance indicators of veterans treatment courts: The Kentucky experience

Veterans’ Treatment Courts (VTCs) are posited as a solution to offer rehabilitation for veterans involved in the criminal justice system. Despite the pervasive implementation of VTCs, there is little research focused specifically on VTC implementation and outcomes, which are based on other problem-solving court models such as drug court. The current study presents qualitative process evaluation data from key stakeholders (n = 21) and veteran participants (n = 4) to show accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned during first-year implementation at two VTC sites. Quantitative performance data is also presented on veteran participants (n = 19) served during the first year to show: types of services, monitoring, judicial interaction, sanctions/therapeutic responses, and rewards, as well as preliminary data on recidivism. Qualitative data, from both key stakeholders and veteran participants, suggests that offering rehabilitation via various program components, services/referrals, and accountability are critical to the success of the VTC. Data also provides valuable lessons learned for VTC implementation including communication, collaboration, information/protocols, and resources. Performance data shows that a variety of services are utilized and that frequent judicial interaction, drug testing, and sanctions are cornerstones of the VTC. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.