以残忍的反抗寻求有意义的生活——论“80后”小说颠覆性师长形象及其启示

在"80后"小说的反成长叙事里,塑造了一大批另类的师长形象,他们对青少年只会起到反面的作用,甚至是导致他们迷惘、困惑、颓废、叛逆、堕落、受伤甚至死亡的主因。与此对比,"80后"则以"反"和"拒绝"的姿态成长着,以颓废、反讽、游戏和调侃的姿态叙述着,呈现出一种当代人普遍"在路上"的彷徨、苦闷、焦虑、恐惧和忧伤的流离之苦。这些颠覆性的师长形象从反面表达了"80后"对能真正作为灵魂导师的师长形象的期待,具有非常高的精神境界。     

社会思潮对高校马克思主义大众化的影响及应对

历史与现实的各种因素作用,使得当前各种社会思潮风起云涌并对高校马克思主义大众化产生了深刻影响,主要有影响高校马克思主义大众化对象的广泛性;挑战马克思主义大众化目的的合理性;质疑高校马克思主义大众化内容的正确性;诘难高校马克思主义大众化方法的妥当性;考验高校马克思主义大众化途径的恰当性。有鉴于此,唯有始终坚守马克思主义立场,正确认识和对待各种社会思潮,强化主流意识形态建设,正确推进大众化,才可能富有成效地推进高校马克思主义大众化,进而推进中国特色社会主义事业的健康发展。     

社会思潮对主流意识形态教育的影响及应对

历史与现实的各种因素影响使得社会思潮风起云涌,进而对主流意识形态教育产生了各种挑战,主要有争夺主流意识形态教育的对象、质疑主流意识形态教育的目的、挑战主流意识形态教育的内容和考验主流意识形态教育的途径等。有鉴于此,惟有始终坚守大众立场,正确认识和对待各种社会思潮,强化主流意识形态建设,正确推进主流意识形态教育,才可能富有成效地推进中国特色社会主义事业的健康发展。     

论大学生民族精神的弘扬与培育

民族精神是支撑民族生存和发展的重要精神力量。弘扬和培育民族精神是高校思想政治教育的重要内容。高校的思想政治教育工作、大学生的全面发展以及当前我国高校开展民族精神的现状等都亟需在大学生中大力弘扬和培育民族精神。要确保弘扬和培育的效果,不仅要处理好继承优秀传统和民族精神时代化的关系,还要在发挥学生的主体作用,健全网络,全方位渗透,加强校园文化建设等方面下功夫。     

再论中华民族精神的凝聚力、向心力、生命力

中华民族精神是中华民族之魂。“多元一体”、众志成城的民族统一凝聚力是古代中华民族精神的核心 ;万众一心、振兴中华的爱国主义向心力是中国近代民族精神的精髓 ;解放思想、实事求是 ,团结一致向前看是中国现代民族精神的生命力 ;众志成城、战胜非典、持续发展是中国当代民族精神的亲和力。     

试论弘扬和培育民族精神

民族精神是一个民族占主导地位的思想品格、价值取向和道德规范的精华。中华民族拥有以爱国主义为核心的团结统一、爱好和平、勤劳勇敢、自强不息的民族精神。应在改革开放和现代化建设实践中弘扬和培育民族精神。     

东汉后期士风之转变及其原因探析

~~东汉后期士风之转变及其原因探析@牟发松$武汉大学人文科学学院!湖北武汉430072 @李磊$武汉大学人文科学学院!湖北武汉430072~~~~~~     

新时期加强大学生民族精神教育的思考

弘扬和培育民族精神是高等院校新时期思想政治工作的一个重要任务,必须着力提高学生对民族精神的价值认识,通过各种教育资源和平台,着重加强学生爱国主义、艰苦奋斗和历史使命教育。     

Private Passions, the Public Good and Public Service Reform

There has been considerable recent discussion of the impact of public service reforms on the work ethics and motivations of public service workers. In this article we draw upon recent research on the ethical dilemmas facing regeneration workers in order to look more closely at the role of values in the working lives of public service professionals. Focusing on the commitment to social justice, we argue that such values find expression in two interlinked ways, as something workers have and as a process of giving value to different goods. Our research reveals that while both aspects of values are rooted in people's life experiences the second dimension is more contingent and relational. While public service reforms appear to have less impact upon workers’ pregiven values, they can and do have an impact on the way in which these values find expression in attachment to different goods. To understand the effect of such reform processes on workers’ motivations we therefore need a more complex conceptual framework than that provided by either simple public sector ethos/private sector ethos distinctions or by models of economic individualism offered by writers such as Julian Le Grand.     

Grounding Twenty-first-Century Public Relations Praxis in Aristotelian Ethos

ABSTRACT

By grounding public relations praxis in Aristotelian ethos, practitioners can function as liaison officers with balanced perspectives, capable of co-creating meaning with both client organizations and their publics between whom experts are hired to facilitate mutually beneficial relationships. This approach locates persuasion at the nexus of speaker ethos in the public relations process. It allows practitioners to balance their commitment to the ethics of their profession with loyalty to clients, while empowering audiences (organizations and their publics) to function as the final arbiters of any courses of action proposed to them. Moreover, because the approach enables practitioners, based on their credible ethos, to participate in organizational decision-making, it has the potential to transfer their ethical worldview to client organizations. Ultimately, the central theoretical contribution of this essay is an alternative approach to public relations praxis founded on an analysis of Aristotle’s notion of phronesis, arête, and eunoia.