Of peasants and publics in colonial India: Daduram's story

ABSTRACT

This article uses an exceptionally well-documented law case from the 1650s to offer a fresh perspective on the English experience of Atlantic settlement during its early years. It argues for the centrality of the Essex county quarter sessions court in the building of neighbourhood on the geographic and cultural margins of the Massachusetts Bay colony. By focusing on the north-eastern margin at Cape Ann, the analysis reveals aspects of state building through a common law judicial process which was just as important, but less readily apparent, in other settings. The article addresses three major historiographic areas, engaging with the historical literature on English neighbourhoods and English adaptation to the American environment, on the significance of witchcraft or maleficium in English societies, and on the nature and meanings of law, law courts and judicial process in the building of communities. Case documents also enable the use of some concepts and techniques of literary analysis related to the study of narrative, arguing that judicial verdicts selected and suppressed aspects of local stories elicited during the course of the investigation in order to craft an account of local neighbourhood that suited a broader cultural narrative of Massachusetts Bay’s political consolidation during the 1650s.     

夫妻共同生活之用意之于不动产物权

我国婚姻法司法解释（三）（征求意见稿）首次尝试在不动产物权流转法律关系中援引夫妻共同生活的理念,此做法值得肯定,但由于未充分认识到该理念的价值而使得征求意见稿不尽完善。事实上,夫妻共同生活之用意不仅可以作为不动产物权归属的判定依据,而且可以作为限制配偶一方擅自处分个人财产的正当理由。     

近十年国内英语中介语错误研究述评

通过对CNK I近十年国内核心期刊刊载论文的分析,从研究方法、研究角度和研究内容揭示国内中介语错误研究现状,总结出该领域的研究趋势,同时提出一些问题,以期为未来研究提供一些启示。     

比较法视野下的人民陪审员制度改革

新一轮司法体制改革在强化职业化主审法官主导地位的同时，提出了完善人民陪审员制度、拓宽人民群众有序参与司法渠道的改革目标。比较日本、韩国的民众参与司法裁判的新制度，可知中、日、韩三国的制度改革虽然目标相近，但制度背景、制度内容及其取得的效果却有较大差异。如何平衡好司法专业性与民众参与之间的关系并确保专业性优先，是当前中国司法改革需要考虑的首要问题。参与审判并非普通民众参与司法活动的唯一形式，应当拓宽人民群众参与司法的形式和渠道，加强顶层设计，重视发挥人民陪审员提供专业知识和参与纠纷调解的作用。在今后的人民陪审制改革中要转换视角，弱化政治意义而强化司法功能，细化相应的程序实体规则，注意考虑司法审判相关主体与参与司法裁判民众之间的关系。     

近五年来科学发展观价值研究综述

本文通过科学发展观所包含的丰富价值理念等问题研究状况的简要介绍,展示了近五年来学界对该问题研究的发展趋势、重要成果,旨在促进该问题的继续深入研究。     

Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process

Repeatedly, adequacy, performance and quality of Ethics Committees that oversee medical research trials are being discussed. Although they play a crucial role in reviewing medical research and protecting human subjects, it is far from clear to what degree they fulfill the task they have been assigned to. This eventuates in the call for an evaluation of their activity and, in some places, led to the establishment of accreditation schemes. At the same time, IRBs have become subject of detailed legislation in the process of the ongoing global juridification of medical research. Unsurprisingly, there is a tendency to understand the evaluation of RECs as a question of controlling their legal compliance. This paper discusses the need for a quality evaluation of IRBs from an ethical point of view and, by systematically reviewing the major ethical guidelines for IRBs, proposes a system of criteria that should orientate any evaluation of IRBs.     

马克思主义中国化研究述评

马克思主义中国化的研究经过了多年的发展取得了一系列喜人的理论建树,特别是研究的重点不断拓宽,在基本内容、内在关系等方面颇为深入,呈现出了全方位、多层次、宽领域的特点.同时研究焦点的视角不断衍伸, 但仍在诸多方面存在着盲点,而这正是必须深入耕犁的领域,我们也试图从思想下乡、范式建构、信仰研究等方面突破盲点,以期为马克思主义中国化的新发展尽绵薄之力.     

论社会公民权的保障——以国家义务的适当承担为出发点

社会福利制度与公民权的结合便形成社会公民权。社会公民权之目的是确保一定的福利水平，使公民过上一种“文明化的生活”。而国家一般通过宪法等形式来确认社会公民权。公民与国家在社会公民权方面的争议可通过社会公民权的适当限制、理性的公众参与以及相应的司法救济予以解决。     

Open Review of Science Publications

Publication of scientific research in print is traditionally peer reviewed anonymously prior to publication, which is a time-tested process but has serious limitations. The advent of the Internet permits postpublication open review online after minimal review by the editors or the author-selected reviewers, which can be quick, that permits the authors to revise the content. Most meritorious articles published online may be selected for publication in print as annual or biennial collections.     

论专利无效司法审查的原则和范围

从国际法角度对专利无效司法审查问题进行探讨,并通过案例分析、法理分析、国际法与国内法的关系角度分析,研究发现:专利无效司法审查是法院的职权范围,应遵循合法审查的原则,应当从实体和程序两个方面进行审查;在实体方面的审查结果,可以根据案情直接作出专利无效或有效的判决;在程序方面,可根据不同情况作出撤销原审查决定、撤销原审查决定并责令专利复审委重新作出审查决定或维持审查决定的判决或裁定。