Inference for the Identified Set in Partially Identified Econometric Models

This paper provides computationally intensive, yet feasible methods for inference in a very general class of partially identified econometric models. Let P denote the distribution of the observed data. The class of models we consider is defined by a population objective function Q(θ, P) for θ∈Θ. The point of departure from the classical extremum estimation framework is that it is not assumed that Q(θ, P) has a unique minimizer in the parameter space Θ. The goal may be either to draw inferences about some unknown point in the set of minimizers of the population objective function or to draw inferences about the set of minimizers itself. In this paper, the object of interest is Θ₀(P)=argmin_θ∈ΘQ(θ, P), and so we seek random sets that contain this set with at least some prespecified probability asymptotically. We also consider situations where the object of interest is the image of Θ₀(P) under a known function. Random sets that satisfy the desired coverage property are constructed under weak assumptions. Conditions are provided under which the confidence regions are asymptotically valid not only pointwise in P, but also uniformly in P. We illustrate the use of our methods with an empirical study of the impact of top‐coding outcomes on inferences about the parameters of a linear regression. Finally, a modest simulation study sheds some light on the finite‐sample behavior of our procedure.     

Inference for Parameters Defined by Moment Inequalities Using Generalized Moment Selection

The topic of this paper is inference in models in which parameters are defined by moment inequalities and/or equalities. The parameters may or may not be identified. This paper introduces a new class of confidence sets and tests based on generalized moment selection (GMS). GMS procedures are shown to have correct asymptotic size in a uniform sense and are shown not to be asymptotically conservative. The power of GMS tests is compared to that of subsampling, m out of n bootstrap, and “plug‐in asymptotic” (PA) tests. The latter three procedures are the only general procedures in the literature that have been shown to have correct asymptotic size (in a uniform sense) for the moment inequality/equality model. GMS tests are shown to have asymptotic power that dominates that of subsampling, m out of n bootstrap, and PA tests. Subsampling and m out of n bootstrap tests are shown to have asymptotic power that dominates that of PA tests.     

Bootstrap for U-statistics: a new approach

Bootstrap for nonlinear statistics like U-statistics of dependent data has been studied by several authors. This is typically done by producing a bootstrap version of the sample and plugging it into the statistic. We suggest an alternative approach of getting a bootstrap version of U-statistics. We will show the consistency of the new method and compare its finite sample properties in a simulation study and by applying both methods to financial data.     

Self‐normalization for Spatial Data

This paper considers inference for both spatial lattice data with possibly irregularly shaped sampling region and non‐lattice data, by extending the recently proposed self‐normalization (SN) approach from stationary time series to the spatial setup. A nice feature of the SN method is that it avoids the choice of tuning parameters, which are usually required for other non‐parametric inference approaches. The extension is non‐trivial as spatial data has no natural one‐directional time ordering. The SN‐based inference is convenient to implement and is shown through simulation studies to provide more accurate coverage compared with the widely used subsampling approach. We also illustrate the idea of SN using a real data example.     

Optimal allocation with fixed power in a completely randomized design with levels of subsampling

In many completely randomized design experiments, levels of subsampling may be performed on each experimental unit. In such cases the expected mean square error E(MSE) for testing among treatment groups is comprised of variance components analogour to those associated with the primary sampling unit is nested sampling Marcuse (1949) gives a procedure to minimize the cost of obtaining the samples if a desired degree of precision in the E(MSE) is fixed. However, her method gives no consideration to the resulting power of the test for differences among the treatment groups. Our method stipulates that the power, rather than the precision, is fixed at a critical level and the total cost is minimized subject to this constraint.     

Analysis of mutual funds’ management styles: a modeling,ranking and visualizing approach

A method to rank mutual funds according to their investment style measured with respect to the returns of a reference portfolio (benchmark) is introduced. It is based on a style analysis model estimating a mutual fund portfolio composition as well as the benchmark one. Starting from such compositions, it computes a proximity measure based on the L ₁ or L ₂ norm to assess the similarity between each mutual fund portfolio returns and the benchmark returns as well as between the returns of each benchmark constituent and that of the corresponding mutual fund constituent. To this purpose the mean integrated absolute error and the mean integrated squared error are computed to derive both a global ranking of mutual fund management styles and partial rankings expressing the over- (under-) weighting of each portfolio constituent. A visual inspection of the results emphasizing main differences in management styles is provided, using a parallel coordinates plot. Since a modeling, a ranking and a visualizing approach are integrated, the method is named MoRaViA. From the practitioners’ point of view, it allows the identification of a specific management style for each mutual fund, discriminating active management funds from passive management ones. To evaluate the effectiveness of MoRaViA, many sets of artificial portfolios are generated and an application on a set of equity funds operating in the European market is presented.     

Interpenetrating subsampling regression estimation with or without jackknifing

In this paper four regression estimators are considered for a finite population total based on interpenetrating subsamples, two of which are with jackknifing and the other two are without jackknifing. Both theoretical and empirical comparisons of the four proposed estimators are done with respect to bias, variance and mean square error.     

Subsampling Intervals in Autoregressive Models with Linear Time Trend

A new method is proposed for constructing confidence intervals in autoregressive models with linear time trend. Interest focuses on the sum of the autoregressive coefficients because this parameter provides a useful scalar measure of the long‐run persistence properties of an economic time series. Since the type of the limiting distribution of the corresponding OLS estimator, as well as the rate of its convergence, depend in a discontinuous fashion upon whether the true parameter is less than one or equal to one (that is, trend‐stationary case or unit root case), the construction of confidence intervals is notoriously difficult. The crux of our method is to recompute the OLS estimator on smaller blocks of the observed data, according to the general subsampling idea of Politis and Romano (1994a), although some extensions of the standard theory are needed. The method is more general than previous approaches in that it works for arbitrary parameter values, but also because it allows the innovations to be a martingale difference sequence rather than i.i.d. Some simulation studies examine the finite sample performance.