首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   45篇
  免费   1篇
  国内免费   1篇
管理学   1篇
人口学   4篇
丛书文集   3篇
理论方法论   8篇
综合类   24篇
社会学   7篇
  2022年   1篇
  2016年   4篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   3篇
  2013年   15篇
  2012年   3篇
  2011年   4篇
  2010年   4篇
  2009年   1篇
  2008年   1篇
  2007年   2篇
  2006年   3篇
  2005年   2篇
  2004年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
排序方式: 共有47条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
在中国生命伦理学领域,原则主义的决策框架遭遇实践困境,权利话语的“先天不足”,自主原则的分离以及忽略了人们实际条件的能力模型是其困境之源.西方将尊重自主作为解决困境的出路,但这种模型将自主当作一个静止的概念,遮蔽了个体与社会的真实关系;由于中国文化思维的差异性以及处于社会转型的特殊时期,决定了原则主义之西方解决路径在中国不具有适切性.在中国语境下,儒家伦理能为消解原则主义困境提供本土化的道德资源,包括“仁爱”的道德基础、“经权”的方法论、情理结合的理性条件以及家庭的介入.  相似文献   
2.
进入科技时代,人们在激烈的科技竞争、狂热追逐利润过程中,经常忽视人类共同的利益。这些归根到底都是生命伦理问题,关乎每个个体的切身利益。只有对科技做出正确的伦理引导,科技才不会滑向人类的反面。用人伦道德来限制科技经济发展的盲目性的同时,更须不断推进法制的健全,使生命伦理原则法制化。我们不仅需要马克思主义理论武装,还需要儒家思想醇关处事风范,使我们生命伦理超出个体利益的局限,走向生命意识的升华。  相似文献   
3.
当前,我国实行强制隔离戒毒的效果并不理想。从生命伦理学的视角看,强制隔离戒毒长期限制戒毒人员的人身自由,戒毒人员的人身安全和医疗救治得不到保障,有偿劳动难以落实,从而严重伤害了戒毒人员的心理尊严、生命尊严和劳动尊严。进行有尊严的戒毒改革,需变强制性、大规模隔离戒毒为自愿的、社区服务治疗为主的小规模隔离戒毒,变劳动康复与社区戒毒就业安置为行为治疗及与社会接轨的职业技能培训,并发放最低生活保障金,鼓励其参与正常就业竞聘、实现自我价值,以保护戒毒人员“做人”的尊严和生命尊严,重塑戒毒人员的社会尊严和人格尊严。有尊严的戒毒将成为未来社会戒毒的主导模式和戒毒改革的努力方向。  相似文献   
4.
Specialized and up-to-date knowledge is required to identify and manage the risks associated with advanced biomedical research. Additional complexities need to be considered when the research involves infants or young children. In this article, we focus on recent information about the physical risks of pediatric magnetic resonance imaging research and highlight information gaps. With an eye to assisting institutional review boards and researchers, we consider strategies for the management of these risks and formulate key questions aimed at exposing hidden hazards. Institutional review boards should ask these questions, and researchers should bear them in mind as they develop research protocols.  相似文献   
5.
In a study of volunteers in medical research we found contrasting readings of “being comfortable” by the volunteer research subjects and the researchers. Although the experimental process (testing a new kind of diagnostic technology) involved some physical discomfort—and the researchers focused on this—the volunteers’ concerns centred on feeling socially comfortable and managing feelings of embarrassment or isolation, and they generally made light of the physical aspects. The bias of volunteer concerns, which is understandable in terms of the different situations of researchers and volunteers and the different tensions they create, has potential implications for the engagement of researchers with their research subjects and prevailing standards for the ethical and accountable conduct of research.  相似文献   
6.
The bioethics movement has long promulgated a model of ‘principled decision‐making’ in which ethical dilemmas and conflicts between various rights, interests, and ethical principles are central. In many respects this movement has had a laudatory impact on health care and on health professionals, but we will also argue that the bioethical model of ethical analysis has important limitations. The model's theoretical orientation is discontinuous with the training and skills of health professionals, the manner in which health professionals conceptualise and solve problems that arise in a clinical setting, and the time constraints inherent in most clinical situations. As such, the model is not readily applicable to much of the day‐to‐day work of clinicians and, in particular, to the routine ethical questions and situations that arise in caring for patients. What we suggest is that the bioethical model does not take into account that health care professionals, as part of their daily work, encounter and manage difficult, often conflictual situations and that they do so by bringing to bear conceptual frameworks and therapeutic techniques that have, embedded within them, the ethical values and goals of their own fields, as well as established ways of dealing with problems and addressing competing priorities. We further argue that from a systems perspective, the bioethical model and the pragmatic, problem‐focused ethical decision‐making of clinicians operate on different levels of complexity; whereas the former is especially appropriate for situations that resist consensus or that raise significant issues of public policy, the latter serves as an effective framework in less difficult or complex situations that can be moved effectively toward consensus and closure.  相似文献   
7.
abstract

The Massachusetts Task Force on Human Subject Research has so far been the only serious attempt to investigate radiation experiments on humans. No other federal, state or private agency has looked at a specific experiment in detail. The President's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE) provided an overview of the entire nationwide research project, but without a thorough evaluation of any single experiment. The Massachusetts Task Force examined a group of experiments using institutionalized children at two state facilities, the Fernald and Wrentham schools, from 1943 to 1973. The experiments were performed under supervision by scientists at Harvard and MIT, and were funded by several federal agencies. The Task Force found that these experiments were conducted according to the ethical and protocol standard of their day. This did not prevent the Task Force from judging that the experiments violated human rights, and recommending apology and compensation to the victims.  相似文献   
8.
公共健康伦理:概念、使命与目标   总被引:12,自引:0,他引:12  
公共健康已经成为发展中国家面临的一个突出问题。公共健康可以定义为公众的健康,公共健康伦理旨在对公共健康进行伦理学研究,其主要使命在于为促进公众健康、预防疾病、减少风险和伤害提供伦理支持。公共健康伦理的根本目标———公众的健康可以分阶段、分步骤地实现。  相似文献   
9.
“三鹿事件”的发生,最终使在我国实行了8年的食品免检政策退出了历史舞台。本文通过对此案例的分析提出:公共政策的评估应有科学性及合伦理性两个维度,二者缺一不可。食品免检政策之失正在于其模糊了对人类生命价值至高无上地位的认识,缺失了公共政策的伦理维度尤其是生命伦理维度,因此也就动摇了其继续存在、运行的根基。我们的结论是:在整个公共政策的制定、执行和评价过程中必须始终贯彻生命价值至高无上的原则和理念。公共政策的生命伦理维度必不可少。应该借助学者、公众以及其他决策主体的力量,分层次、有重点地强化生命伦理对那些与人的生命健康价值休戚相关的公共政策决策过程和内容本身的影响。  相似文献   
10.
Ethics Anxiety     
This case report, drawn from an American hospital, explores a phenomenon best described as ethics anxiety, a feeling of uncertainty as to what is ethically required or permitted, leading to clinical delay and confused decisions. In the specific clinical situation presented, the clinicians find themselves confronting, under severe time constraints, a complex, multidimensional problem with ethical and legal implications. The situation deteriorates as the clinicians find themselves unable to find what they perceive as the expert advice, either clinical or ethical, that would enable them to resolve the problem presented. In the discussion section of the case report, some attention is given to the role that the bioethics movement itself has had in creating these situations and undermining clinical decision‐making.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号