“But I’m not a racist!” Phenomenology,racism, and the body schema in white,pre-service teacher education

In this article, I call for a phenomenological turn in educating white, pre-service teachers. As opposed to dominant pedagogical models which focus on changing one’s beliefs about race, phenomenology points toward the importance of pre-conceptual, pre-critical forms of racial embodiment. Here I draw upon recent work on the different between body image (beliefs about the body) and body schema (what the body can do). The worry is that existing forms of anti-oppressive education miss the centrality of the schema, and thus do not go far enough in uncovering the embodied, perceptual roots of racism.     

The Existential Side of Kohut's Tragic Man

This article explores the way in which Kohut's concept of Tragic Man functions as a response to criticisms of self psychology as proffering a partial, utopian, strife-denying theory of human development. After citing several representative critiques in this respect, I review the concept of Tragic Man as defined by Kohut, and then seek to deepen the clinical usefulness of this concept through a discussion of affects, empathy, and free association. A clinical vignette concludes the paper, through which some of these ideas find illustration.     

论胡塞尔对科学的哲学维护

胡塞尔把理性危机和哲学危机视为近代欧洲科学危机的根源，并运用现象学还原方法建立所谓严格科学的哲学，从而在由纯粹理性建构起来的“生活世界”的基地上对具体科学进行了哲学维护。但是，胡塞尔的见解启示与困难并存。他的出路在于，用实践的思维方式取代“看”的直观，用历史与逻辑相统一的方法取代神秘的现象学方法。     

现象学的问题如何发生--德里达对胡塞尔发生现象学的解读

德里达对胡塞尔的发生现象学有他自己的特殊理解,他研究了观念的历史,以及根据所形成的心理习惯构成的观念,当然,这也是观念对象构成的历史过程。发生是一个陌生的过程:在即将来临的历史中包含着一种中断。德里达描述了从某种确定的目的论返回到胡塞尔所新近确立的起源问题的运动结构。德里达研究稳定的结构与发生现象学之间的关系,在这个过程中,德里达提出了关于解构的基本问题。     

胡塞尔后期现象学方法简论

胡塞尔认识到了欧洲科学危机的根源——物理学的客观主义及其演变形式实证主义,从而把对哲学的研究转向了生活世界。生活世界是胡塞尔后期现象学方法的根基。胡塞尔后期现象学独特的范式是先验还原的方法。胡塞尔后期现象学方法作为一种综合思辨的哲学方法,为哲学研究开辟了广阔的方法论视野,现象学的开放性和包容性为人类赢得了新的思想发展空间,能实现价值理性和工具理性的有机结合,为人类的思想危机提供了解决方法。     

An Existential Approach to Risk Perception

Existential, or existential-phenomenological philosophical approaches to the social psychology of risk perception provide a novel framework for understanding issues that are common to all humanity, such as fear of death, freedom and responsibility, isolation and meaninglessness, as these anxieties are a function of existing, or being-in-the-world. These fundamental anxieties can be related theoretically to the ways people perceive risks within social and cultural milieus, and can also be used practically within case studies, as demonstrated in the three examples presented, which examine perceptions of climate change, food-related risks, and environmental awareness via a mixture of quantitative and qualitative techniques. The discussion focuses on the possible insights that can be gained from taking an existential perspective on risk perception, and relates notions of contemporary technologically-oriented societies to the existential challenges faced by individuals and societies in the contemporary world.     

构筑知识的基础——胡塞尔、弗雷格方法论比较

现象学学派和分析哲学学派都是20世纪哲学界的显学。本文认为独特的方法论原则往往能使哲学家在哲学探索中独辟蹊径,现象学学派和分析哲学学派的成就与两派各自独特的方法论原则息息相关,因此,本文试图追寻哲学史发展的脉络,比较研究充当“领头羊”角色的两位哲学巨匠胡塞尔和弗雷格的方法论原则,以加深对现象学方法和分析哲学方法的理解,洞察二者思想的精微之处。     

从现象学到生活艺术哲学

“作为生活艺术的哲学”已成为当代欧洲思想界的一个热点,对哲学的这种理解和实践与20世纪的现象学运动密不可分。无论是胡塞尔的生活世界,还是海德格尔的此在分析,都是以关怀人类生存、合理安顿人与世界的关系为根本动机的。现象学对理论和实践关系的倒置、对在场和缺席关系的倒置、对确定性和可能性的倒置、对必然性和偶然性的倒置,为生活艺术哲学做了充分的理论奠基,由此出发,生活艺术哲学在哲学实践、审美泛化等向度上得到了发展。现象学的“小零钱”精神、“前科学”立场、关注意义构建、重回古典哲学的精神和实践,都成为生活艺术哲学的基本立场。     

Making the Case for Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis with LGBTGEQ+ Persons and Communities

ABSTRACT

The emergence of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in qualitative scholarship offers a means to derive in-depth meaning attending to the complexities of lived experience. IPA extends qualitative inquiry through a double hermeneutic whereby the researcher is making sense of the experiences of participants who are making sense of a phenomenon. In this article, the authors present seminal empirical studies using IPA with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, gender expansive, queer communities, argue a rationale for its usefulness, discuss methodological insights and strategies, and offer potential future directions.     

胡塞尔“构造”概念的三种图式

“构造”概念是胡塞尔现象学的核心概念，它被用来刻画意义如何向我们显现。索科拉夫斯基认为，胡塞尔分别在静态现象学和发生现象学阶段采取了“静态构造”的形式-质料图式和“发生构造”的一元论图式。笔者将指出，随着后期胡塞尔现象学的推进，构造的含义将更加复杂，它同时指示了自我在世界视域之中的横向结构，以及绝对时间意识支持着世界经验、并与其相互交织的纵向结构。笔者也将在此基础上，提出第三种构造图式。