Does geographical proximity matter in determining the profitability of banks?

Despite the existence of a burgeoning literature on bank profitability, yet, none of them gave due consideration to geographical proximity. I fulfill such a gap by analyzing the effects of COVID-19 on the profitability of top-rated banks. Findings confirm the prevalence of spatial dependence at both the global and sub-global with feedback effects being systematically higher than spillover effects. My study uncovers evidence of a COVID-19 induced decline in asset utilization. Findings advocate sharing economy as a potential tool to banks in combating any future pandemic risk with regionalized approach to supervision being deemed better than its globalized counterpart.     

Corporate Management,Industry Competition and the Sustainability of Firm Abnormal Profitability

This paper models the sustainability of firmabnormal profitability and uses theeffectiveness of corporate managementcapabilities as a test to examine its impact onthe sustainability of firm abnormalprofitability. The role of industry competitionas a moderator between the effectiveness ofcorporate management capabilities and thesustainability of firm abnormal profitabilityis also examined. Consistent with theresource-based view of the firm, we found thatthe effectiveness of corporate managementcapabilities positively influence thesustainability of firm abnormal profitability.This implies that corporate managementcapabilities are important contributors to theentire bundle of firm-specific resources andcapabilities which enable some firms togenerate competitive advantages that aresustainable. The effectiveness of corporatemanagement capabilities has a larger influenceon the sustainability of firm abnormalprofitability for firms in lowly competitive ormonopolistic industries than firms in highlycompetitive industries. The findings supportthe notion that not only do firm capabilitiesyield sustainable competitive advantages andabnormal profitability, but also industrycompetition reinforces the impact of firmcapabilities in yielding sustainable abnormalprofitability.     

私募股权投资参与、企业社会责任与盈利能力研究——基于新三板的数据

本文以251家新三板私募股权投资基金支持企业为样本,研究了企业社会责任履行与盈利能力之间的关系.研究发现:企业对政府、股东、债权人、管理层、员工、客户、社会大众负责与企业盈利能力存在显著的正相关关系.投资企业的PE个数与企业盈利能力显著负相关.企业对供应商负责、PE总投资额与盈利能力没有显著相关性.     

中国城市商业银行盈利能力影响因素分析——基于50家商业银行的微观数据

基于2009-2015年期间国内50家城市商业银行(城商行)的微观数据,采用动态面板数据模型实证检验了资产负债结构及其他宏微观因子对城商业银行盈利能力的影响。研究结论表明:负债及资产结构对城商行的盈利能力具有显著的影响,一般性存款占负债的比重、贷款占资产的比重均与其盈利水平显著正相关;城商行的资产质量及成本控制水平越高,盈利能力也越强;规模越大并不意味着盈利能力越强,那些规模较小的城商行因为聚焦于中小客户群体、具有更高的定价话语权而能够获取更高的盈利;GDP增长率、货币政策等外部宏观环境并不会显著影响城商行的盈利水平。因此,城商行不应追求单纯的规模扩张而应着力强化资产负债统筹管理,并立足自身资源禀赋及市场定位,走差异化、特色化发展道路。     

我国商业银行资本结构对盈利能力的影响研究

银行业在国民经济中占有重要地位,其稳定和发展对一国经济有着重要的推动作用。商业银行的特殊资本结构和盈利能力的相关性一直是学术界争论的热点,一方面,如何在股权资本和债权资本中寻求平衡,找寻最优点对银行盈利能力有着直接影响;另一方面,资本结构也可以通过影响公司治理结构来影响银行的盈利能力。     

反转策略的盈利性研究——基于RIM、Ohlson模型与简单财会指标的比较

以沪深股市1998年1月至2013年6月所有A股股票的月度收益为样本,比较各种反转策略,从账面价值、现金流、过去收益的简单财会指标到更复杂的Ohlson模型和残差收入(RIM)模型,分析反转策略的盈利性。实证结果表明,虽然RIM和Ohlson模型要求更多的信息输入和复杂算法,但产生的超额收益优于采用简单财会指标的策略。最后研究发现,选择运用何种反转策略得到最大超额利益,只取决于投资者的技术先进性、信息收集成本及预期投资大小。     

固定收益债券信用等级迁移的影响因素分析：基于财务指标的实证研究

固定收益债券的信用等级迁移问题日益引起投资者和监管者的关注,预测信用等级迁移需要找到关键指标。财务数据对企业未来业绩具有显著影响,可以反映运营企业的信用质量。当前信用等级发生迁移债券存在发行期限集中、行业特征明显、发债目的差异化等特点,通过构建Logistic模型对影响债券信用等级迁移的财务指标进行实证分析发现：偿债能力和盈利能力都对企业债的信用等级迁移具有显著影响,但是信用升级和信用降级分别对不同的财务指标敏感。发债企业要想提高债券信用等级,需提高盈利能力;投资者要想降低信用风险,应考虑减少甚至剔除投资组合中偿债能力发生显著负面变化的债券;监管者要想对发债企业进行更有效监管,需关注偿债能力指标以及主营业务利润率的变化。     

层次分析法在财务分析中的应用

财务比率综合指数法是在汇总各项财务比率的基础上,为了获得一个总的认识,运用指数法计算出一个综合指标,以此作为综合评价企业财务状况和经营绩效的主要依据。各项财务比率的重要性系数可应用层次分析法中的1~9标度法确定,该方法的运用,将定性评价企业财务状况分析指标定量化。     

荷银澳元理财产品分析

荷兰银行于09年6月推出一款个人保本理财产品,以澳元对美元的汇率为标的,号称＂涨跌双赢＂,年收益率可高达9%,本文从该产品的性质、该产品对日波动率变动的反应分析、即期汇率与汇率均值有较大差距时的反应分析得出结论,该产品风险很大,这是二元期权的基本特征。     

Customer satisfaction: Cost driver or value driver? Empirical evidence from the financial services industry

We investigate the relation between customer satisfaction, customer servicing costs, and customer value in a financial services firm. We find that customer satisfaction is positively associated with future customer servicing costs, as well as with customer value. The relation between customer satisfaction and customer value appears non-linear; higher customer satisfaction appears to have a higher return for the most profitable customer segments. Our findings indicate that customer satisfaction is a value driver; however, customer satisfaction is not cost-free and managers have to consider the costs, as well as the benefits, of increasing customer satisfaction.