Evaluation of the relationship between microalbuminuria and 25-(OH) vitamin D levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background: 25-(OH) vitamin D (VD) deficiency has been described as potential risk factor for the development of diabetes in many epidemiological studies. 25-(OH) VD deficiency and insulin resistance associated with this deficiency are common findings in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between 25-(OH) VD levels and microalbuminuria.

Methods: The patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged between 40 and 65 years, who were admitted to the diabetes outpatient clinics of our hospital, were evaluated in two different groups. The first group consisted of 119 patients with insufficient 25-(OH) VD levels (10–30?ng/mL) and the second group consisted of 121 patients with 25-(OH) VD deficiency (≤10?ng/mL). The relationship between 25-(OH) VD levels and the level of microalbuminuria was evaluated in the two groups.

Results: The mean 25-(OH) VD level was 11.5?ng/mL and the mean HbA1c level was 9.1%. When the patient groups were evaluated according to 25-(OH) VD levels, HbA1c values were significantly higher in patients with a 25-(OH) VD level of 10?ng/mL or lower (p?=?.039). 25-(OH) VD levels were not significantly different between patients with different stages of renal failure (p?=?.119), whereas the level of microalbuminuria was significantly different (p?=?.030).

Conclusions: This study found that the level of microalbuminuria was significantly higher in patients with 25-(OH) vitamin D deficiency compared to patients with 25-(OH) VD insufficiency.     

Association of vitamin D status and the risk of cardiovascular disease as assessed by various cardiovascular risk scoring systems in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D (25[OH]D) status and the risk of cardiovascular disease as assessed by various cardiovascular risk scoring systems such as QRISK2, BNF, ASSING, SCORE, and Framingham in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).

Methods: The study included 108 patients with vitamin D insufficiency (25[OH]D?≥?10–30?ng/mL) and 100 patients with vitamin D deficiency (25[OH]D?Results: HbA1c levels were significantly higher in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had significantly higher Framingham risk score (p?p?r?=?0.537) and a weak but statistically significant correlation between 25[OH]D levels and BNF score (r?=?0.295). 25[OH]D levels were significantly higher and HbA1c levels were significantly lower in patients with Framingham cardiovascular risk score ≤10%.

Conclusion: We found a close relationship with Framingham cardiovascular risk score in diabetic patients with very low serum vitamin D levels. Cardiovascular risk as assessed by the Framingham’s scale increases with decreasing 25[OH]D levels. BNF score was negatively correlated with 25[OH]D levels.     

The relationship between vitamin D level and erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Recent studies have suggested that a relationship could exist between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] deficiency and erectile dysfunction (ED). The present study evaluated the relationship between 25(OH)D levels and ED in male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The study included 98 patients with type 2?DM aged between 18–80 years. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire was administered. The patients were divided into three groups according to IIEF-5 scoring: IIEF-5 score between 5–10, severe ED; IIEF-5 score between 11–20, moderate ED; IIEF-5 score between 21–25, no ED. Biochemical parameters, 25(OH)D and hormonal analysis tests were obtained in all patients. All parameters were compared between these three groups. Of 98 patients included in the study, 32 had severe ED, 45 had moderate ED and 21 had no ED. The mean age was 55.12?±?9.39 years and the mean 25(OH)D level was 13.69?±?8.15?ng/ml. When the three groups were compared, 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in patients with the IIEF-5 score between 5–10 (p?=?0.020). There was a moderate positive relationship between IIEF-5 score and 25(OH)D level (r?=?0.21, p?=?0.038). The patients with severe ED have considerably lower 25(OH)D levels.