Confidence and Likelihood*

Confidence intervals for a single parameter are spanned by quantiles of a confidence distribution, and one‐sided p‐values are cumulative confidences. Confidence distributions are thus a unifying format for representing frequentist inference for a single parameter. The confidence distribution, which depends on data, is exact (unbiased) when its cumulative distribution function evaluated at the true parameter is uniformly distributed over the unit interval. A new version of the Neyman–Pearson lemma is given, showing that the confidence distribution based on the natural statistic in exponential models with continuous data is less dispersed than all other confidence distributions, regardless of how dispersion is measured. Approximations are necessary for discrete data, and also in many models with nuisance parameters. Approximate pivots might then be useful. A pivot based on a scalar statistic determines a likelihood in the parameter of interest along with a confidence distribution. This proper likelihood is reduced of all nuisance parameters, and is appropriate for meta‐analysis and updating of information. The reduced likelihood is generally different from the confidence density. Confidence distributions and reduced likelihoods are rooted in Fisher–Neyman statistics. This frequentist methodology has many of the Bayesian attractions, and the two approaches are briefly compared. Concepts, methods and techniques of this brand of Fisher–Neyman statistics are presented. Asymptotics and bootstrapping are used to find pivots and their distributions, and hence reduced likelihoods and confidence distributions. A simple form of inverting bootstrap distributions to approximate pivots of the abc type is proposed. Our material is illustrated in a number of examples and in an application to multiple capture data for bowhead whales.     

Building and Fitting Non‐Gaussian Latent Variable Models via the Moment‐Generating Function

Abstract. For certain classes of hierarchical models, it is easy to derive an expression for the joint moment‐generating function (MGF) of data, whereas the joint probability density has an intractable form which typically involves an integral. The most important example is the class of linear models with non‐Gaussian latent variables. Parameters in the model can be estimated by approximate maximum likelihood, using a saddlepoint‐type approximation to invert the MGF. We focus on modelling heavy‐tailed latent variables, and suggest a family of mixture distributions that behaves well under the saddlepoint approximation (SPA). It is shown that the well‐known normalization issue renders the ordinary SPA useless in the present context. As a solution we extend the non‐Gaussian leading term SPA to a multivariate setting, and introduce a general rule for choosing the leading term density. The approach is applied to mixed‐effects regression, time‐series models and stochastic networks and it is shown that the modified SPA is very accurate.