三峡移民社区的整合机制分析——兼论移民纠纷框架下社会资本的缺失与重构

三峡移民社区的整合一直是学术界关注的问题之一。本文通过实地调查和个案访谈，以移民纠纷作为切入点。主要分析了移民社区中社会资本的缺失与重构。认为移民社区的整合和合法性的获得来源于国家力量和移民、移民和移民之间关系网络的生成和维系。而移民纠纷深深的“嵌入”这些关系网络所构成的社区基础秩序之中。同时深刘的体现了社区合法性的维系机制。     

民事诉讼举证责任中应注意的几个问题

民事诉讼对举证责任的规定极其笼统、抽象。本文认为 :应进一步明确民事举证责任的涵义 ,应在基本范围内指导举证 ,并应充分提高证据的质和量 ,同时针对特殊举证的责任应采取相应对策。     

对苗族家族场域中的一件离婚纠纷的分析

文章通过苗族家族场域中的一件离婚纠纷,分析了农村家族在解决纠纷方面的作用及弊端,认为在没有法律传统的乡土社会,可以允许宗族组织的力量来解决纠纷,让家族继续在农村纠纷的解决中发挥作用,但同时也认识到由于国家法律资源的不足与农村人们法律意识的落后,也使家族成了人们规避法律的场所。因此,目前,引导好家族在解决纠纷方面发挥作用并避免它成为人们规避法律的场所,就变得十分紧迫和必要。     

清末中西祭祖纠纷与中国教民

在清末中西祭祖纠纷中 ,中国教民扮演了颇为独特的两难角色。清末中西祭祖冲突大多发端于祭产或族产上的纠纷 ,以经济利益的争夺为引子 ,并介入行政、外交等手段 ,从而质变为中西文化冲突的一种模式。因此 ,产权利益的得失 ,是中国教民首先必须面对的严峻问题。同时 ,族群归宿所带来的认同感 ,也严重困扰着中国教民。中国教民在产权利益、族群归宿与外来信仰间无从抉择 ,其摇摆变易的形象 ,反映了身处祭祖纠纷困境的中国教民的两难心态。     

高校招生纠纷可诉化与高校的应对措施

高校招生纠纷即将由不可诉变为可诉,其法理基础是高校作为特殊公法人,其招生行为具有行政行为的属性.高校在招生中要承担依法招生、公正招生、遵守招生合同等义务.高校因招生纠纷被诉的主要事由包括进行虚假的招生宣传、招生政策不合法、不按公布的规程录取考生等.为应对招生纠纷可诉化,高校既要在诉讼出现时积极应诉,更要注意避免被诉.高校避免因招生纠纷被诉的主要措施包括树立依法招生的理念、重视<招生章程>的制订与发布以及规范招生行为.     

《海洋自由论》及其国际法思想

本文介绍了格老秀斯《海洋自由论》的主要内容及其蕴涵的国际法思想。格老秀斯以自然法理论为基础 ,从葡萄牙对东印度无主权、无权垄断海洋和海上航行权以及无权垄断国际贸易权等三个角度来阐释其海洋自由和贸易自由理论 ;其蕴涵的国际法思想主要有 :航行自由和捕鱼自由、贸易自由、无害通过权、人类共同财产及和平论与和平解决国际争端等。这些闪耀着国际法思想光芒的真知灼见对今天的国际海洋法制度有着深刻的影响。在强权政治仍然主宰世界的今天 ,重温格老秀斯的国际法思想 ,仍有着积极意义。     

论仲调结合在“一带一路”商事纠纷解决中的运用

根据“一带一路”商事纠纷的显著特征,其解纷机制应满足形式灵活多元、合意性较强、跨国执行便利、专业水平高等需求。仲调结合作为一种复合型纠纷解决方式,与诉讼、商事仲裁、商事调解相比所具有的优势更能满足以上需求。目前,仲调结合主要存在“先调解后仲裁”与“先仲裁后调解”两种实践模式。为了优化仲调结合在“一带一路”商事纠纷解决中的运用,应丰富仲调结合形式与设置具体操作规则,加强仲调结合组织建设与解纷人才培育,充分赋予当事人选择权以克服程序质疑,健全错误仲调结合结果的救济机制,订立多边条约与承认互惠关系以优化跨国执行等。     

中日“穿”、“脱”动词比较研究

正确使用动词是语言学习中重要的一环,本文以中、日二种文字为对象,选择“穿”和“脱”两个动词,比较其表达方式和使用方式,以加深学习者对日语该类动词的理解,并达到能够正确使用的目的.     

Allegations of child sexual abuse in parenting disputes: An examination of judicial determinations in the Family Court of Australia

This study examined Family Court of Australia (FCA) judicial determinations in parenting disputes when allegations of child sexual abuse (CSA) are made by an interested party, usually the mother. For the study, 156 published judgments from 2013–2015 were examined to measure how often allegations of CSA are substantiated, suspected to be true, and disbelieved. The characteristics most common in substantiated versus unsubstantiated cases, evidence of abuse presented, and resulting parenting orders were assessed. Findings indicate that, against international comparisons, FCA judges substantiate cases very conservatively, with rates of substantiation much lower than in other studies. Allegations made by mothers against fathers were disproportionately unsubstantiated, as were those which did not fall under the Magellan case management system. Cases where the only evidence of CSA was a child’s disclosure and parent’s allegation were common in both substantiated and unsubstantiated cases, meaning that a lack of other evidence does not preclude a positive finding of risk of CSA by the FCA. Those cases also involving a protection order against the accused were more likely to be substantiated. Confirmation biases and a judicial tendency to err on the side of false negatives are discussed.     

Efficiency or Competition? A Structural Econometric Analysis of Canada's AWS Auction and the Set‐Aside Provision

In 2008, Industry Canada auctioned 105 MHz of spectrum to a group of bidders that included incumbents and potential new entrants into the Canadian mobile phone market, raising $4.25 billion. In an effort to promote new entry, 40 MHz of spectrum was set‐aside for new entrants. In order to estimate the implicit cost of the set‐aside provision, we estimate the parameters of the bidders' profit function via a maximum match estimator based on the notion of pairwise stability in matches. We find that all telecommunications firms valued both geographic complementarities across auction licenses as well as absolute spectrum. Under a reasonable alternative scenario, our results indicate that the set‐aside led to a total profit loss of approximately 10%.