Anti-statism and Difference Feminism in International Social Movements

Feminist strategies that neglect or consistently deplore state action cannot accomplish what women need – because individuals need collectives such as states to solve collective action problems and to move toward more just social arrangements. Strategies that rely heavily on women's differences from men also cannot accomplish what women need – because women are like men in many ways relevant to individual and collective action. Despite these truths, social movements also need some strategies of action that work separately from and sometimes against the state. Moreover, strategies that accentuate the differences between oppressed and oppressing bring needed energy to a movement. The best overall strategy is, therefore, to realize that both states and difference theories are dangerous weapons, and proceed with caution.     

中国古代赈灾研究——以湖南为例

中国古代每遇自然灾害,社会动荡不安,统治者为维护政权长治久安,不能不对灾民加以赈济安抚。古代赈灾类型从灾因上分为水灾赈济、旱灾赈济、虫灾赈济、疫灾赈济;从赈源上分为朝赈、官赈、民赈;从施赈方式上分为急赈、蠲缓、平粜、工赈。尽管各种赈济方式均存在弊端,但对救民于垂危还是颇有成效的。     

对我国要物合同规定的反思

由于要物合同与合意主义在表面上存在严重冲突,许多学者主张将之废除。但由于他们未能正确认识到要物合同这一旧的法律遗产被保留下来的真正原因,要物合同存在的理论意义与现实意义被低估了。从正当性的视角看,法律规定要物合同不仅是对交易形态的如实反映,且会为当事人的系争提供规范依据,在特定的交易场合,该设计甚至有利于达成当事人双方利益关系的平衡;从必要性的视角看,要物合同之设不仅会回应社会生活中的现实需求,且它为设计将来可能出现的非传统要物合同留下了余地,甚至某些新的交易形式亦有需求它的空间。我国的要物合同规定应在如上法理的基础上加以修正。     

对行政征收无偿性的质疑

文章首先界定了行政征收概念,介绍了目前学界关于行政征收性质的通说——行政征收是无偿的。进而作者运用行政法理论分析了行政征收无偿性的不妥之处,指出行政征收是有偿的。     

为何把政治性人权伦理化?──赵汀阳先生《有偿人权和做人主义》献疑

人权是个人或群体向国家或政治社会要求做人的权利的政治性范畴，它具有绝对性、无条件性和无偿性。若把人权伦理化，则就把人权之个人或群体与国家或政治社会的关系转变为个人与别人的关系；同时由于伦理的利他性，伦理化的人权就不但不应向别人要求权利，倒是相反地把本应属于个人的权利让渡给别人。因此，当人权被伦理化之后，人权就具有了相对性、有条件性和有偿性，这样一来，人权实际上已被取消了。