首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“黄金大米”:风险时代技术理性的失范与规约
引用本文:王 超,李奇伟.“黄金大米”:风险时代技术理性的失范与规约[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,13(2):109-117.
作者姓名:王 超  李奇伟
作者单位:1.湖南中医药大学 人文社科学院,;2.南华大学 文法学院,
基金项目:国家社科基金重点项目(12AZD071);国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX095)
摘    要:对"黄金大米"事件起因与事件进程的解读表明,它不只是阐释一个新的科研失范案例,其深层次的认识根源在于技术理性的单向度发展,其社会面向则凸显了技术理性与社会理性之间的分歧与断裂。在风险社会的时代背景之下,寻求规制技术理性泛滥的守则与方法在路径选择上不应囿于理性概念的纯粹思辨,而应立足于社会的审视与反思,透过风险意识启蒙、公共对话与道德法治的规约,促使技术角色合理回归,弥合技术理性与社会理性之间的深深裂痕。

关 键 词:“黄金大米”  技术理性  科研失范  转基因食品
收稿时间:1/4/2014 12:00:00 AM

On the Flood of Technical Rationality and Regulation in Risk Era---Rethink on“Golden Rice Incident Event”
WANG Chao and LI Qi-wei.On the Flood of Technical Rationality and Regulation in Risk Era---Rethink on“Golden Rice Incident Event”[J].Journal of South China Agricultural University:Social Science Edition,2014,13(2):109-117.
Authors:WANG Chao and LI Qi-wei
Institution:1.College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,;2.School of Law, University of South China,
Abstract:By analyzing causes and course of “Golden Rice event”,we point out the event is not just a new anomie case in scientific research and its roots should be the expansion of technical rationality to -wards one direction .It also reflects the differences and fracture between technical rationality and social rationality.In the risk society , the approach of restraining technical rationality should be based on the perspective of society instead of being confined to purely speculation of concept .We should improve risk awareness , public dialogue , and the rule of ethics and law to bring the role of technology to a reasonable position .
Keywords:Golden rice incident event  technical rationality  anomie of scientific research  GM food
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号