| 论“行政契约”的判断标准 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 阎磊.论“行政契约”的判断标准[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2011(6):96-100. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 阎磊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所／中国社会科学院法学所联合培养博士后,北京,100720 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从大陆法系几个主要国家（地区）对行政契约含义的阐释来看,行政契约的判断标准主要有：一、以德国和我国台湾地区为代表的＂契约标的理论＂,即行政契约是以发生、变更或消灭行政法上的法律关系为标的;二、以法国和日本为代表的＂三标准＂：即以＂合同主体＂＋＂公务目的＂＋＂特殊权力保留条款＂作为行政契约的判断标准;三、混合标准：我国内地部分学者采契约标的理论,部分采三标准,部分将契约标的理论和三标准共同作为行政契约的判断标准。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政契约 判断标准 契约标的理论 公共服务 特殊权力保留 |
Judgment Standard of Administrative Contracts |
| |
| YAN LEI.Judgment Standard of Administrative Contracts[J].Journal of Xidian University (Social Sciences Edition),2011(6):96-100. |
| |
| Authors: | YAN LEI |
| |
| Institution: | YAN LEI(China Institute of Legal Application,The Supreme People's Court,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,100720,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the interpretation of administrative contract in the countries from the continental law system,the judgment standard of the administrative contract mainly includes： One,the ＂contract theory＂ with Germany and Taiwan as a representative;Two,the ＂three standards＂ with France and Japan as a representative;Three,the mixed standard： some scholars in mainland China adopt the theory of contract mark,some three standards,and some use contract mark theory and three standard as the judgment standard of the administrative contracts. |
| |
| Keywords: | Administrative contract Judgment standard Contract mark theory Public service Special powers to keep |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
