| 两岸民用航空犯罪司法管辖权问题研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张鸣胜,陈明.两岸民用航空犯罪司法管辖权问题研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2010,23(4):37-40. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张鸣胜 陈明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京航空航天大学,人文与社会科学学院,江苏,南京,210016;南京航空航天大学,人文与社会科学学院,江苏,南京,210016 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 海峡两岸的司法管辖权从对峙走向交流,经历了曲折的反复。两岸的法律制度,也沿着两条不同的轨迹发展。虽同属于大陆法系,但不同的历史发展铸就了两个不同类型的法域。这样的隔阂,必然会阻碍两岸的司法交流。基于这个缺陷,从国际民用航空违法犯罪的司法管辖权这一制度出发,介绍了大陆以及台湾民用航空违法犯罪的司法管辖权,并从两岸管辖权的比较入手,分析了两岸民用航空违法犯罪的司法管辖权异议,提出了异议的解决途径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民用航空违法犯罪 司法管辖权 异议 |
| 收稿时间： | 2010-05-24 |
Research on the Jurisdiction of Civil Aviation Crimes |
| |
| ZHANG Ming-sheng,CHEN Ming.Research on the Jurisdiction of Civil Aviation Crimes[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(Social Sciences Edition),2010,23(4):37-40. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ming-sheng CHEN Ming |
| |
| Institution: | College of Humanities and Social Sciences,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Cross-strait relations have experienced ups and downs. On both sides, the legal system has developed along two different tracks. They belong to the same civil law system, but their law systems are two different types. Based on this shortcoming, the author will introduce the international jurisdiction of civil aviation crimes and the jurisdiction of mainland and Taiwan civil aviation crimes. Through elaborating the comparison of the jurisdiction of cross-strait civil aviation crimes, the author proposes solutions of jurisdictional issues. |
| |
| Keywords: | civil aviation crime jurisdiction objections |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
