首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

走向与前瞻:评《刑事诉讼法》的再修改
引用本文:万毅.走向与前瞻:评《刑事诉讼法》的再修改[J].新疆大学学报(社会科学版),2004,32(4):42-46.
作者姓名:万毅
作者单位:四川大学法学院 四川成都610064
摘    要:自1996年刑事诉讼法修订以来,我国的政治经济生活发生了较大变化。2004年宪法修改以及人权保障条款的"入宪",更是成为推动我国刑事诉讼法修改的直接动力。然而,要制订一部垂范久远的刑事诉讼法典,需要把握以下几个宏观问题:第一,刑事诉讼法再修改的逻辑起点应当是超职权主义诉讼制度;第二,刑事诉讼法再修改的目标定位应当是实现程序正义;第三,刑事诉讼法再修改的路径选择应当沟通建构理性主义与经验理性主义;第四,刑事诉讼法再修改应当选择创新型制度移植的道路。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼制度  人权  职权主义  当事人主义  程序正义
文章编号:1000-2820(2004)04-0042-05
修稿时间:2004年6月8日

Orientation and Expectation:Comments on the Revision of Chinese Criminal Procedural Law
WAN Yi.Orientation and Expectation:Comments on the Revision of Chinese Criminal Procedural Law[J].Journal of Xinjiang University,2004,32(4):42-46.
Authors:WAN Yi
Abstract:After Chinese Criminal Procedural Law was revised in 1996, great changes have taken place in the political economic life of China. The revision of Chinese Constitution in 2004 and the entry of articles of human rights into the Constitution have become the direct impetus for the revision of Chinese Criminal Procedural Law. However, four macroscopic issues need considering if a lasting criminal procedural code is to be worked out. Firstly, the logical starting point of the revision of criminal procedural law should be the one that transcends ex-officio litigation system. Secondly, the revision of criminal procedural law should be orientated to the realization of procedural justice. Thirdly, the path of the revision should be one that links constructive rationalism with empiricist rationalism. Fourthly, the transplantation of innovative system should be chosen.
Keywords:criminal procedural system  human rights  ex officio litigation system  adversary litigation system  procedural justice
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号