首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于我国刑法不存在片面共犯的探究
引用本文:吴思齐.关于我国刑法不存在片面共犯的探究[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,24(5):23-27.
作者姓名:吴思齐
作者单位:苏州大学 法学院,江苏苏州,215006
摘    要:关于片面共犯是否应以共同犯罪论处,理论界有肯定说与否定说之争。因果共犯论只是为共犯提供了处罚根据,并未实际解决片面共犯是否成立共犯的问题。肯定说和否定说的理论基础是行为共同说与犯罪共同说。以行为共同说为基础所推演的结论不具有唯一性,结合我国刑法的规定,应当从解释论上得出否定说的结论。片面共犯尽管在理论上可以成立,但是依据外国刑法解释出的结论并非一定能适用于我国的司法实践。

关 键 词:因果性  行为共同说  共同故意  解释论

No Existence of One-sided Accomplice in China’s Criminal Law
Abstract:Theorists have disputes on whether one‐sided accomplice shall be regarded as joint complicity ,forming positive theory and negative theory .Theory of causal accomplice provides a basis of punishment for accomplice while it does not exactly solve the problem that whether one‐sided accomplice constitutes joint complicity .The theoretical basis of positive theory and negative theory are the theory of joint conduct and the theory of criminal commonness .The conclusion inferred on the basis of theory of joint conduct is not specific .Combined with China's Criminal Law statutes ,the conclusion from the interpretation theory shall be negative . Although one‐sided accomplice exists in theory , conclusion based on the explanation of foreign criminal law can’t be used in the judicial practice of China .
Keywords:causality  theory of joint conduct  joint intent  interpretative theory
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号