首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对社会科学定量型研究中社会评价性研究结果准确性的思考
引用本文:章礼霞,周俊瑶. 对社会科学定量型研究中社会评价性研究结果准确性的思考[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, 7(6): 87-89
作者姓名:章礼霞  周俊瑶
作者单位:中国矿业大学,外文学院,徐州,221008;中国矿业大学,外文学院,徐州,221008
摘    要:
定量型研究这种以精确为特征的方法和技术在当代社会科学很多领域得到广泛应用,它也日益渗透到我们的日常工作和生活中来,如高校教学质量评价、媒体调查等。但本文通过对两个调查个案的比较分析研究,认为相对于自然科学恒定的研究对象、统一的测量单位以及精确的计算,社会科学研究(尤其在社会评价性研究方面)在研究对象抽象、媒介语言具有模糊性、测量标准不能保证统一的前提下,经过复杂公式计算出来的量化结果,其科学性也许要打折扣。

关 键 词:定量型研究  语言模糊性  准确性
文章编号:1009-3370(2005)06-0087-03
收稿时间:2005-06-28
修稿时间:2005-06-28

On the Veracity of Quantitative Approach and Results of Evaluation in Social Science
ZHANG Li-xia and ZHOU Jun-yao. On the Veracity of Quantitative Approach and Results of Evaluation in Social Science[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 7(6): 87-89
Authors:ZHANG Li-xia and ZHOU Jun-yao
Affiliation:1.School of Foreign Language Studies,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221008
Abstract:
The quantitative approach,characteristic of precision,is used in many areas in modern social science,and it has also penetrated into our daily life and work,such as in media survey or college teaching quality review.But by comparing study of two investigating cases,this paper argues that the quantitative approach in social science,especially the investigations involving social evaluation,cannot guarantee the veracity of the results calculated by complex formulas,with the objects studied abstract,the medium language vague in nature,and the measurements diverse;while in natural science,the objects studied are constant and usually concrete,the measurements are unified and precise and can be conversed mutually.
Keywords:Quantitative approach  vagueness in language  veracity  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号