首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

遵循先例:中国审判机制改革的应然选择
引用本文:王幽深,陈永忠.遵循先例:中国审判机制改革的应然选择[J].宁夏社会科学,2004(4):10-13.
作者姓名:王幽深  陈永忠
作者单位:1. 西北第二民族学院,法律系,宁夏,银川,750021
2. 宁夏广播电视大学,宁夏,银川,750001
摘    要:重理性抑或重经验 ,一直被学界视为是大陆法系和英美法系的分水岭。由于我国的法律传统在客观上更多地倾向于大陆法系 ,所以我们的司法目标一直被定格在对理性的追求上。事实证明 ,这种严格遵循成文法制度 ,以追求理性为目标的司法制度 ,并不完全适合我国的实际情况 ,同时也浪费了大量的司法资源。因此 ,在强调理性或者不完全放弃理性追求的同时 ,适度采用“先例判决”制度 ,是完善我国司法制度、提高司法质量的应然选择。

关 键 词:先例  审判  机制  改革
文章编号:1002-0292(2004)04-0010-04
修稿时间:2004年1月6日

Adhere to the Precedent:A Necessary Choice for Chinese Legislative Mechanism Reformation
WANG you-shen,CHEN yong-zhong.Adhere to the Precedent:A Necessary Choice for Chinese Legislative Mechanism Reformation[J].Social Sciences in Ningxia,2004(4):10-13.
Authors:WANG you-shen  CHEN yong-zhong
Abstract:The academe has always believed the division between the civil law systems, also Known as the continental system and common law system is whether the system basence. The Chinese law system to a great extends fall in the continental system due to the traditional Chinese legislation. This is why we are confined in the knowledge of codification for a long time. Statute law system, as a matter of fact, does not fit in the Chinese situation and causes a great deal of waste of legislative recourses. The authors therefore argue that adopting judicial precedents reasonably to the present Chinese law system is a considerate choice in consummating Chinese law system and enhancing the judicial quality.
Keywords:recedent  Judgment  Mechanism  Reformation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号