| 对洪秀全太平天国历史定位的商讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李锦全.对洪秀全太平天国历史定位的商讨[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2004,44(6):73-80. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李锦全 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学,哲学系,广东,广州,510275 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 有学者称近20年来对太平天国与辛亥革命的评价,先后发生巨大反差的现象.所谓反差,有说太平天国的赞颂者与批判者已形成势均力敌的两大流派,亦有提出否定太平天国必然为曾国藩翻案,为曾国藩翻案必名胜古迹否定太平天国.这种感情用事、各执一偏而简单运载立的思维方式,对历史问题无助于得出公平公正的评价.该文不参加两大流派的争论,主张用科学理性的分析,对洪秀全太平天国做尽可能符合客观实际的历史定位.
|
| 关 键 词： | 洪秀全 向西方求真理 太平天国 农民革命两重性 曾国藩的两面性 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-9639(2004)06-0073-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年9月18日 |
Reconsidering the Historical Status of Heavenly Kingdom Led by Hong Xiuquan |
| |
| LI Jin quan.Reconsidering the Historical Status of Heavenly Kingdom Led by Hong Xiuquan[J].Journal of Sun Yatsen University(Social Science Edition),2004,44(6):73-80. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jin quan |
| |
| Abstract: | It has been a striking contrast towards the appraisal of Heavenly Kingdom and the Revolution of 1911 among some scholars in the recent two decades. The so called contrast refers to the two counterbalanced schools of praising and criticizing Heavenly Kingdom. Meanwhile some scholars argue that it is inevitable to reverse the verdict for Zeng Guofan if dispraising Heavenly Kingdom, or vice versa. This simplicist, irrational, one sided way of thinking is detrimental to a fair and just appraisal of historical issues. This paper stands away from the debate between the two schools, and suggests a scientific and rational analysis of Heavenly Kingdom so as to give an objective and realistic appraisal of its historical status. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hong Xiuquan Heavenly Kingdom historical asppraisal |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
