| Affiliation: | 1.Pathological Gambling Unit, Department of Psychiatry,Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL,Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona,Spain;2.Ciber Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn),Instituto de Salud Carlos III,Madrid,Spain;3.Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine,University of Barcelona,Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona,Spain;4.Département de Psychoéducation,Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières,Trois-Rivières,Canada;5.Department of Psychiatry,University of Minnesota Medical School,Minneapolis,USA;6.Departament de Psicobiologia i Metodologia de les Ciències de la Salut,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,Bellaterra, Barcelona,Spain;7.Nursing Department of Mental Health, Public Health, Maternal and Child Health, Nursing School,University of Barcelona,Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona,Spain;8.Centre d’Excellence pour la Prévention et le Traitement du Jeu, Faculté de Sciencies Sociales,Université Laval,Quebec,Canada;9.Atención e Investigación en Socioadicciones, Red de Salud Mental y Adicciones,Generalitat de Catalunya (XHUB),Barcelona,Spain;10.Facultat de Psicologia,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,Bellaterra, Barcelona,Spain;11.CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM),Instituto de Salud Carlos III,Madrid,Spain |
| Abstract: | ![]()
Interpersonal distress is a common feature in gambling disorder and adding a concerned significant other (CSO) to the recovery process could be an effective tool for improving treatment outcome. However, little empirical evidence is available regarding the effectiveness of including a CSO to interventions. We aimed to compare treatment outcomes (i.e. compliance with therapy guidelines, dropout from treatment, and relapse during treatment) in a CBT program involving a CSO to CBT treatment as usual (TAU) without a CSO. The sample comprised male gambling disorder patients (N = 675). The manualized CBT intervention consisted of 16 weekly outpatient group sessions and a 3-month follow-up period. Patient CSOs attended a predetermined number of sessions with the patient and were provided with resources to acquire a better understanding of the disorder, to manage risk situations, and to aid patients in adhering to treatment guidelines. Patients with a CSO had significant higher treatment attendance and reduced dropout compared to patients receiving TAU. Moreover, patients whose spouse was involved in the treatment program were less likely to relapse and adhered to the treatment guidelines more than those with a non-spousal CSO. Our results suggest that incorporating interpersonal support to gambling disorder interventions could potentially improve treatment outcomes. |
