首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国环境法庭的困境与出路
引用本文:徐平,朱志炜,杨朝霞.论我国环境法庭的困境与出路[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2014,35(4):41-50.
作者姓名:徐平  朱志炜  杨朝霞
作者单位:(北京林业大学 生态法研究中心,北京 100083)
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(RW2013-24)徐平,女,北京林业大学生态法研究中心教授。
摘    要:近年来,环境审判组织专门化的改革开展得如火如荼,然而,已成立的许多环境法庭却面临“等米下锅”的尴尬。究其原因,最主要的是因为当前的环境司法存在原告起诉资格受限、因果关系证明规则虚置和环境法庭的设立盲目而不成体系等严重障碍。为走出困境,有必要拓宽并明晰环境诉讼的原告资格范围:一是在法律上确认环境权,授予公民提起非纯正环境公益诉讼的原告资格;二是以环境权和诉讼信托、自然资源国家所有权和诉讼担当、法律监督权为依据,分别授予环保组织、自然资源监管机关和检察机关提起纯正环境公益诉讼的原告资格。此外,添加原告关于被告排污行为与其受损之间存在环境上关联性之因果关系表面证据的举证责任,细化举证责任倒置规则,健全和完善环境法庭的级别管辖和集中地域管辖的体系,也有助于推动环境法庭走出困境。

关 键 词:近年来,环境审判组织专门化的改革开展得如火如荼,然而,已成立的许多环境法庭却面临“等米下锅”的尴尬。究其原因,最主要的是因为当前的环境司法存在原告起诉资格受限、因果关系证明规则虚置和环境法庭的设立盲目而不成体系等严重障碍。为走出困境,有必要拓宽并明晰环境诉讼的原告资格范围:一是在法律上确认环境权,授予公民提起非纯正环境公益诉讼的原告资格  二是以环境权和诉讼信托、自然资源国家所有权和诉讼担当、法律监督权为依据,分别授予环保组织、自然资源监管机关和检察机关提起纯正环境公益诉讼的原告资格。此外,添加原告关于被告排污行为与其受损之间存在环境上关联性之因果关系表面证据的举证责任,细化举证责任倒置规则,健全和完善环境法庭的级别管辖和集中地域管辖的体系,也有助于推动环境法庭走出困境。

The Dilemma and Way out of the Environment Courts in China
XU Ping,ZHU Zhi-Wei,YANG Chao-Xia.The Dilemma and Way out of the Environment Courts in China[J].Journal of Jishou University(Social Science),2014,35(4):41-50.
Authors:XU Ping  ZHU Zhi-Wei  YANG Chao-Xia
Institution:(Research Center of Ecological Law,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China)
Abstract:In recent years,the specialized reform of the environmental judicial organization has developed rapidly.However,lots of founded environment courts are still faced with the problem of “Waiting the Rice for Cooking”.The most important reasons are such as limited plaintiff qualification,jurisdictional chaos and vain regulations on burden of proof inversion.To solve the problem,it is necessary to expand the plaintiff qualification:the first method is to confirm the environmental rights by the law,and give citizens plaintiff qualification to bring a impure public environmental interest lawsuit;the second one is to give the plaintiff qualification for environmental organizations,natural resource management and prosecutors to bring a pure public environmental interest lawsuit based on environment right and lawsuit entrust,state ownership of natural resource,legal supervision.In addition,adding the responsibility of plaintiff to prove apparent causality,refining of regulations on burden of proof inversion,perfecting environment court system of jurisdiction,are also helpful for environment court to get out of the dilemma.
Keywords:environment court                                                                                                                        qualification of plaintiff                                                                                                                        environmental rights                                                                                                                        burden of proof
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号