论侵权责任法第十五条责任承担方式规定之缺陷

我国侵权责任法第十五条规定了八种侵权责任的承担方式,而这八种方式并不应该统一以“责任”命名,因为其中某些属于义务而非责任.这不仅在理论上存在问题,实际上也会造成不利于保护绝对权人权利的后果.文章以义务和责任的区别为线索,逐一分析各种方式的实际性质,重点是对于物权法和侵权责任法相重合的返还财产（原物）、恢复原状、消除危险、排除妨害、停止侵害等几种方式进行探讨,得出这些权利救济方式并非“责任”.最后对于如何修正侵权法第十五条规定的问题,提出统一以权利救济之方式进行规定的解决办法.

The Defects of Chinese Tort Liability Law Article 15

In China＇ s Tort Law article 15 lists the eight kinds of the bearing of the tort liability, but the eight kinds should not all be named after ＂responsibility＂, because some of them belong to obligation rather than responsibility. There is a problem not only in theory, in fact also can cause harmful to the protection of real right. Based on the difference between obliga- tions and responsibility, we will analysis of the actual nature of different ways, especially the real right law＇ s and tort law＇ s overlap： return of the property, restorable, eliminate the danger, ruled out sabotage, stop the infringement, etc. Several ways are discussed, it is concluded that they cant be put into the category of ＂ responsibility＂. Finally for the question that how to fix the problem of tort law article 15, undertaking unity provisions in the form of right remedy will make sense.