论司法公开的必要限度--以副卷制度为着眼点分析

我国提出“司法公开”的口号已有很多年了，国内外关于司法公开问题的研究也比比皆是，已经达到了相对成熟的程度。然而，就关于法院案卷的副卷公开问题，研究者却是少之又少。副卷制度的存在，在给司法活动提供便利的同时，也引发了诸多问题。诱发了法院通过上下级领导请示“暗箱”操纵审判结果，或其它机关不当干预司法等现象，破坏司法公正和权威。而副卷制度的存在，形成了巨大“保护伞”，并将这些行为彻底地掩盖起来。因此，副卷制度所衍生出的问题亟需人们深刻反思。随着我国“司法公开”的不断推进，及时发现副卷制度的弊病，并对其进行合理的改造，有助于确保司法真正地在阳光下运行，提升司法运行的社会效果。

Necessary Limitation of Judicial Openness:An Analysis on the Focus of the Secondary File System

Our country has putted forward the slogan of“judicial openness”for years,the domestic and foreign researchs on the issue of public justice have also been found everywhere.However,the researchers for the openness on secondary file of the court are fewer.The existence of the secondary files system,which provides convenience for judicial activities,it also raises many questions.The system induced the “black case work”which controls the outcome of the trial inside the court through the instruction between the superior and the subordinate,or other phenomenon destroying judicial justice and authority such as improper intervention of j udicial .And the existence of the secondary file system has created a huge “umbrella”to cover up these facts completely.Therefore,the problem of the secondary file system arose is thought-provoking.Along with the continuous advancement of our country’s judicial openness,we discover the disadvantages of the system of the secondary file and make reasonable reform on this system.The reformation will ensure that the judicial system is revolving under the sun, eventually,social effect of the judicial operation can be improved too.