论被害人陈述的法律地位

被害人在刑事诉讼中所同时具备的当事人角色与实质证人角色之间的冲突，是所有当事人证据都存在的普遍性问题，并不足以否定被害人陈述作为证据的适格性。由于被害人在公诉案件审判程序中并不具备独立的控诉职能，因此相关之角色紧张在一定程度上得以缓和。在我国刑事证据制度构筑封闭式的证据分类体系的情况下，人证及当事人证据在分类逻辑上的要求，决定了被害人陈述不仅是适格的诉讼证据，而且构成独立的法定证据种类。

On Legal position of the Victim Statement

In criminal proceedings, it makes conflict that the victim plays simultaneously the role of litigant and the role of witness. This is a universal problem for all the litigant-evidence, and does not constitute an excuse to deny victim statement as qualified evidence. Because the victim in the indictment in the trial proceedings does not have an independent complaint function, the tension of roles eases up to a certain extent. In China＇ s closed criminal evidence classification system, the logic classification requirements of words-evidence and litigant-evidence determine that victim statement is either a proper litigation evidence or an independent statutory evidence type.