首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从技科学视角看哥本哈根世界气候大会
引用本文:肖雷波,蔡仲.从技科学视角看哥本哈根世界气候大会[J].阅江学刊,2011(2):23-31.
作者姓名:肖雷波  蔡仲
作者单位:南京大学,南京,210093
基金项目:2010年教育部人文社会科学规划基金“当代科学论中的‘生成论’研究”(10YJA720001)
摘    要:技科学(technoscience)是指科学并非独立于社会、政治与经济之外,它是一种建构性的实践活动,并处在一张由人类因素和非人类因素等异质性力量构成的动态无缝之网中,其中,政治、科学、技术、社会、自然等各因素相互缠绕在一起,无法分开。哥本哈根世界气候大会的目标是各种谈判力量在所谓科学“证据”的基础上相互博弈,建立起某种行动者网络或联盟,即达成一份新协议。但由于各方的科学“证据”分歧太大,这种联盟无法建立,会议也几近失败。因此,虽然发达国家与发展中国家之间有学术交流的公平原则,但他们在气候研究方面的不对称性同样导致了极不公平的政治与经济后果。中国要改变这种不对称地位,就应加强相对自主的气候科研,争取更多的气候科学话语权。

关 键 词:技科学  哥本哈根世界气候大会  科学话语权

The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference from the Technoscience Perspective
XIAO Lei-bo,CAI Zhong.The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference from the Technoscience Perspective[J].Yuejiang Academic Journal,2011(2):23-31.
Authors:XIAO Lei-bo  CAI Zhong
Institution:(Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
Abstract:Technoscience-science under influence of society, politics and economy-is a kind of constructive practical activity in a seamless network of dynamic forces coming from human factors and nonhuman factors. The factors such as politics, science, technology, society and nature, ete are intertwined inseparably. The goal of Copenhagen Climate Change Conference is to reach a new agreement or establish a network or coalition of working countries based on the game playing of the so called "scientific evidences". However, scientific "evidences" from each party differed greatly, a coalition could not be established and the conference almost failed. Though there are principles of fairness between the developed and developing academics, the gap of climate research leads to extremely unfair political and economic consequences. In order to enhance the asymmetric bargaining position, China has to strengthen independent scientific research on climatology to strive for more discourse power.
Keywords:Technoscience  Copenhagen climate change conference  discourse power of science
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号